December 1998 - Test - lists.nanog.org

mae-east-atm, update
by dlr＠bungi.com 19 Dec '98

19 Dec '98

Well, at least two people are now live on the mae-east ATM. Above.net, with an OC12, and Iconnet, with an OC3. After being operational for a few days, I can say that it performs really well with 1 Mbps of traffic :-) Hopefully, some more folks will be live on it soon, and we can see how it is going to scale. I still think that PNIs are the right way to go, but this will work fine for the smaller networks, as an economy-of-scale connection. Let's hope the switches have adequate buffering... -- Dave Rand dlr(a)bungi.com http://www.bungi.com

1 0

Re: appearently so: hotmail.com ... again ?!?
by David Lesher 18 Dec '98

18 Dec '98

Unnamed Administration sources reported that Randy Delucchi said: > From: "Randy Delucchi" <rdelucchi(a)hotmail.com> > > We're upgrading our mailservers, during this process, you may see > intermittant deferrals, refusals, and larger than normal queues. It can > be mitigated by resending, esp. at offpeak times. We hope to be finished > and back to normal shortly. Sorry for the hassle. Hope this is not Yet Another attempt to migrate to NT.... -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz(a)nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

1 0

Re: InterNIC "whois server <handle>" broke?
by Gerry Boudreaux 18 Dec '98

18 Dec '98

At 01:31 PM 12/18/98 -0600, Phil Howard <phil(a)whistler.intur.net> wrote: >But a means still needs to exist for the authorized contact for a >host to be able to get the full server list that Internic has for >that host. Sending the list by e-mail to the contact of record would >seem to me to be the best way to do it. If this still works: http://rs.internic.net/reports/index.html Hope this helps Gerry Boudreaux Network Manager InterSurf Online, Inc.

1 0

Re: appearently so: hotmail.com ... again ?!?
by Randy Delucchi 18 Dec '98

18 Dec '98

We're upgrading our mailservers, during this process, you may see intermittant deferrals, refusals, and larger than normal queues. It can be mitigated by resending, esp. at offpeak times. We hope to be finished and back to normal shortly. Sorry for the hassle. Randy Delucchi, Dir of CS/NOC MSN Hotmail (408) 222-7037 >To: Carl Moberg <carl(a)telia.net>, nanog(a)merit.edu, rdelucchi(a)HOTMAIL.COM, > hostmaster(a)jsnet.com, support(a)EXODUS.NET >cc: rader(a)teak.wiscnet.net >Subject: appearently so: hotmail.com ... again ?!? >Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 10:48:00 -0600 >From: steve rader <rader(a)teak.wiscnet.net> > > > > From: Carl Moberg > > I am (once again) experiencing _heavy_ problems delivering > > mail to mail.hotmail.com. My SMTP sessions keep timing out > > in the initial phase. TCP is up clean but it seems like > > the servers are having a hard time producing anything SMTP-like. > > Anyone else ? > >Carl: > >Us too... see enclosed which I sent yesterday afternoon but >didn't seem to make it through to the list. (It was accepted >by mail.merit.edu with id OAA21910?!) > >My mrtg graphs show it started on tuesday at about 1000-1200 CST. >Some msgs flush around 0300-0400 every night, but mail.hotmail.com >certainly isn't keeping up: > > - tuesday's peak was ~460 msgs > - wednesday's peak was ~690 > - last night it hit 902 > > >Javasoft & Exodus: > >(I doubt rdelucchi(a)HOTMAIL.COM will get this msg...) >Please let hotmail know there smtp msg throughput has >really sucked rocks the last ~ 72 hrs. Thanks. > > >steve >-- -- -- -- >Steve Rader >Systems and Network Manager >WiscNet--Internetworking for Wisconsin >rader(a)wiscnet.net >bash: syntax error near unexpected token `=:)' > >------- Forwarded Message > >Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 13:57:33 -0600 >From: steve rader <rader@teak> >To: nanog(a)merit.edu >Subject: hotmail has gone cold!?! > > >Anybody know what's up with hotmail? To wit... > > gomer(rader): mailq | grep Deferred | grep mail.hotmail.com | wc -l > 593 > >steve >- -- -- -- -- >Steve Rader >Systems and Network Manager >WiscNet--Internetworking for Wisconsin >rader(a)wiscnet.net >bash: syntax error near unexpected token `=:)' > > >------- End of Forwarded Message > > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

1 0

Re: [NIC-981207.1418] whois for 'server SERVER-HANDLE' not returning information?
by nicholas harteau 18 Dec '98

18 Dec '98

i complained to hostmaster(a)internic.net about this a few nights ago, but by the time they got around to replying to my mail, it had been fixed. judging from the response, i think it's more likely that they're having problems with the feature than killing it. Jeffrey Haas wrote: > Has anyone else noted that "whois server <handle>" no longer seems > to be working at the InterNIC? > > -- > Jeffrey Haas "Denial of Spamming is not a crime." > elezar(a)pfrc.org -- Russell Nelson <nelson(a)crynwr.com> -- nicholas harteau nrh(a)sfx.com

1 0

The Cidr Report
by Tony Bates 18 Dec '98

18 Dec '98

This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Dec 18 12:00:00 PST 1998 It is not checked before it leaves my workstation. However, hopefully you will find this report interesting and will take the time to look through this to see if you can improve the amount of aggregation you perform. The report is split into sections: 0) General Status List the route table history for the last week, list any possibly bogus routes seen and give some status on ASes. 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level This lists the "Top 30" players who if they decided to aggregate their announced classful prefixes at the origin AS level could make a significant difference in the reduction of the current size of the Internet routing table. This calculation does not take into account the inclusion of holes when forming an aggregate so it is possible even larger reduction should be possible. 2) Weekly Delta A summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does give some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. Clearly, it is generally a good thing to see a large amont of withdrawls. 3) Interesting aggregates Interesting here means not an aggregate made as a set of classful routes. Thanks to xara.net for giving me access to their routing tables once a day. Please send any comments about this report directly to me. Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html for a daily update of this report. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CIDR REPORT for 18Dec98 0) General Status Table History ------------- Date Prefixes 111298 54438 121298 54337 131298 54282 141298 54446 151298 54647 161298 54628 171298 54720 181298 54712 Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr.plot.html for a plot of the table history. Possible Bogus Routes --------------------- AS Summary ---------- Number of ASes in routing system: 4332 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix: 2126 (1136 cidr, 990 classful) Largest number of cidr routes: 358 announced by AS3561 Largest number of classful routes: 991 announced by AS701 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level --- 18Dec98 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS271 390 148 242 62.1% BCnet Backbone AS3749 229 70 159 69.4% TECNET AS2493 326 179 147 45.1% iSTAR Internet, Inc. AS1785 541 403 138 25.5% NYSERNet Backbone AS701 991 855 136 13.7% Alternet AS174 676 549 127 18.8% Performance Systems International AS5668 133 36 97 72.9% Century Telephone Inc. AS4200 191 98 93 48.7% AGIS (Apex Global Information Ser AS1267 109 30 79 72.5% IUNET-AS AS4293 207 135 72 34.8% IMCI AS4755 133 62 71 53.4% Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. India AS549 220 154 66 30.0% ONet Backbone AS4740 394 330 64 16.2% Ozemail Pty Ltd (ASN-OZEMAIL) AS8517 128 71 57 44.5% UNKNOWN AS1221 384 328 56 14.6% AARNET-AS AS7046 247 194 53 21.5% UUNET-CUSTOMER AS7657 137 86 51 37.2% The Internet Group Limited AS7545 116 66 50 43.1% TPG Internet Pty Ltd AS1239 532 483 49 9.2% SprintLink Backbone AS72 88 40 48 54.5% Schlumberger Information Network AS7496 74 29 45 60.8% Power Up AS577 208 163 45 21.6% Bell Canada Backbone AS3221 84 42 42 50.0% RIPE-ASNBLOCK4 AS10928 90 49 41 45.6% UNKNOWN AS852 172 133 39 22.7% AGT Advance Communication AS719 440 403 37 8.4% LANLINK-AS AS803 71 35 36 50.7% SaskNet Backbone AS7122 111 76 35 31.5% MTS ADVANCED Network Policy AS3564 69 36 33 47.8% Microserve Infromation Systems In AS2707 65 32 33 50.8% WEC For the rest of the previous weeks gain information please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html 2) Weekly Delta Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report 3) Interesting aggregates Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report

1 0

hotmail.com ... again ?!?
by Carl Moberg 18 Dec '98

18 Dec '98

I am (once again) experiencing _heavy_ problems delivering mail to mail.hotmail.com. My SMTP sessions keep timing out in the initial phase. TCP is up clean but it seems like the servers are having a hard time producing anything SMTP-like. Anyone else ? -- carl --------------------------------------------------------- Carl Moberg, TeliaNet voice: +46-8-456 7274 <carl(a)telia.net> fax: +46-8-456 7280 ---------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power to Route!

2 1

Registered Class C addresses
by Peter Polasek 18 Dec '98

18 Dec '98

I apologize in advance if this is an ISP 101 question. Is there any reasonable method for acquiring a registered Class C address these days? We are opening a data center in England and need at least 2 registered Class C addresses IP for the production network. Last time I checked, subnetted class C registered addresses were still available (within the Class A range), but pure Class C addresses were not. We very strongly prefer to avoid subnetting addresses because this becomes extremely difficult maintain when the network becomes large (as this will). The reserved private range address are not appropriate because this will not be a private network. Please reply directly to me and I will issue a summary to the group. Thanks, Peter Polasek pete(a)brass.com

2 1

SF POWER: Dec 16 briefing and indepedent analysis
by Sean Donelan 17 Dec '98

17 Dec '98

For those wondering how a single human error could take down a chunk of the power grid, it now appears there were at least two failures involved in the San Francisco blackout. The original root cause: the failure to remove safety grounds; and a second failure in the protective systems. The second failure in the protective systems is now under investigation. http://www.pge.com/whats_new/news/outage.html PG&E has added a 2nd backup system to the San Mateo plant. Exactly what the second backup system is supposed to do, wasn't clear from the PG&E statement. In addition to PG&E's internal investigation, there are now two other independent investigations by the California Public Utility Commission and the California Independent System Operator. This power outage seems to have struck a nerve. I don't remember there being this type of hostility after the double Western States blackouts in 1996. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation

1 0

Re: System and Network Monitoring
by Ravi Pina 17 Dec '98

17 Dec '98

On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 10:55:15AM -0500, Ashley Streb wrote: > Any examples of this up and running? I can see the one reference to it > at http://puck.nether.net/sysmon/, but would like something a little more > detailed. > I would be curious to see how people have implemented it and > exactly how they have extracted information out of > it. > > Thanks. > > -Ashley What are you looking for? The best way to get an example is to run it yourself. I use it to monitor our entire network, all production machines and each of their processes. The system emails out up/down pages which I send to our internal ticketing system, to a pager gateway, and log to a local facility. >From there, you can just imagine what can be done. -r

1 0