- Test - lists.nanog.org

Time Waner Cable IPv6 help needed
by Yang Yu 16 Nov '15

16 Nov '15

Last month after a service upgrade/reprovisioning I am no longer getting an IPv6 prefix. Now all I see are RAs and never a response to DHCPv6 solicit. I have tried different support channels but no luck getting an answer. >From what I gathered IPv6 is available in my market and no known outages. Can someone please ping me offline? Very much appreciated Yang

1 0

Re: Project Fi and the Great Firewall
by Brandon Butterworth 15 Nov '15

15 Nov '15

> This is what roaming data means, Your data packet is simply trunked to > your original operator to process. So you will be having a US ip on > the web. And continuity of US tracking of your use rather than temporary Chinese tracking brandon

3 2

Colo space at Cermak
by Mike Hammett 14 Nov '15

14 Nov '15

Has something happened the past couple months to cause a quick shortage of space at Cermak? I had an offer sent a few months ago (when I didn't need it) where a cab and five cross connects were cheaper than what five cross connects normally are, much less the cabinet value as well. Around that time I think cabinets were going for $700 or so for basic primary\redundant 20A. Now the cabinet is going for $1,800. It went from being the cheapest I've seen at Cermak to the most I've seen at Cermak in a matter of a few months. Two people with space in that building are citing an uptick in demand. Really? That much of a demand increase with hundreds of thousands of square feet coming online in the Chicago metro? Can anyone corroborate that story or are they just making stuff up hoping I agree to inflated cabinet prices? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com

5 4

comcast metro-e questions
by Mike 14 Nov '15

14 Nov '15

Hi, Anyone here using comcast metro-e? I'd like to hear the good, bad and the ugly. I have a call in to sales but it being the weekend I won't be expecting a response, but I'm also wondering off the top of my head on general ballpark pricing for gigE? Thanks. Mike-

1 0

Re:Updated Ookla Speedtest Server Requirements
by Janusz Jezowicz 14 Nov '15

14 Nov '15

We have done lots of 1Gbit testing in last months while improving our own speed tester for 1Gbit. We found Speedtest.net very inaccurate on 1Gbit (especially in IE) If anyone is interested in our test results feel free to have a look here> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6260259/BSC%20HTML5%20Speedtest%20vs%20… Our test setup was - We spawned 2x 1Gbit network instances on Amazon EC2 and measured throughput between them. We found DSLReports being much more accurate, on top of being HTML5 based. Of course we are very biased because we offer speed test as well, but I hope it prompts someone to verify if results from Ookla on 1Gbit connections are what they expect. Janusz http://www.speedchecker.xyz > The speedtest.net is flash based. Many computers struggle to measure 1g> speed and not because the network is slow. I think you will find it very> hard to get a 10g measure. > If you like us just want to be sure your 1g users get 1g even when other> users are running parallel tests, you do not need to worry too much about> the server. It needs a 10g NIC but it does not need to perform more than 2g>if even that. You will simply not have that many parallel tests running at> any given time. > > Regards > > Baldur Den 9. nov. 2015 22.27 skrev "Lorell Hathcock" <lorell () hathcock org>: Esteemed Legions of NANOG: Does anyone have better and more modern recommendations for the hardware of an Ookla speedtest server? Here is the link to their recommendations. http://www.ookla.com/support/a26461638/ I want a server that is capable of handlilng a speedtest up to 10Gbps. I plan to do this with an SFP+ port when my network comes along. (As soon as MikroTik comes out with a decent 10G CCR router that is compatible with more SFPs.) In the mean time I will just test 1 Gbps speeds off a copper GE port, but want the SFP+ capability so I don't have to repurchase hardware in the next year. Thanks! Sincerely, Lorell Hathcock Chief Technology Officer SolStar Network, LLC Communications FIBER - VOIP - SECURITY - TV FTTH - Commercial - Residential Burglar - Access Control 956-478-5955 (cell) - 956-316-4090 (main) <mailto:lorell <lorell> () SolStarNetwork com> lorell () SolStarNetwork com <http://www.solstarnetwork.com/> www.SolStarNetwork.com TX License #B19998

1 0

Another puck.nether.net Outage?
by Crist Clark 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

There hasn't been a any traffic on the puck.nether.net list to which I am subscribed since the 10th. I sent something to cisco-nsp yesterday and retried today, and nothing has come through. Is it me or puck? I apologize for using NANOG for this, but jared's email is puck.nether.net too; something OOB is needed. I know there are many, many people here who also follow puck.nether.net lists and some may have another way to reach him.

4 3

Contact for Open Resolver Project?
by White, Andrew 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

Hi there, If anyone from the Open Resolver Project is on-list, would love to get in touch re. getting a feed of open resolver data for our ASN. I have not been receiving response to the email address listed on the project's web site. Andrew White Desk: 314.394-9594 | Cell: 314.308-7730 NetOps Consultant, DAS DNS group Charter Communications 12405 Powerscourt Drive,<http://www.html5zombo.com/> St. Louis, MO 63131

1 0

RE: Favorite GPON Vendor?
by nanog-isp＠mail.com 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

> Too bad they require registration.... Direct download link: http://www.webcaster4.com/Player/Material?uid=2305846&materialGuid=5f4478fb… Or login with doe(a)sharklasers.com. Jared

1 0

Favorite GPON Vendor?
by Jay Patel 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

Who is your favorite GPON OLT/ONU Vendor? Why? I am looking for recommendations I apologize in advance , if you feel my question is inappropriate for this mailing list ( feel free to point me to right forum/mailing list). Regards, Jay.

17 22

Fwd: Updated Ookla Speedtest Server Requirements
by Lorell Hathcock 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Lorell Hathcock <lorell(a)hathcock.org> > Date: November 9, 2015 at 7:18:31 PM CST > To: Jose Gerardo Perales Soto <gerardo.perales(a)axtel.com.mx> > Subject: Re: Updated Ookla Speedtest Server Requirements > > Jose: > > This is what I was looking for. I assume you have a PCI-E SFP+ cage line card in that bad boy? > > Lorell > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 9, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Jose Gerardo Perales Soto <gerardo.perales(a)axtel.com.mx> wrote: >> >> Currently using IBM/LENOVO x3550 / 12 GB RAM / 2 x Xeon E5620 >> >> 10GbE uplink currently handling ~2gbps peak traffic. >> >> - Gerardo >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lorell Hathcock >> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 3:27 PM >> To: 'NANOG list' <nanog(a)nanog.org> >> Subject: Updated Ookla Speedtest Server Requirements >> >> Esteemed Legions of NANOG: >> >> >> >> Does anyone have better and more modern recommendations for the hardware of an Ookla speedtest server? >> >> >> >> Here is the link to their recommendations. >> >> >> >> http://www.ookla.com/support/a26461638/ >> >> >> >> I want a server that is capable of handlilng a speedtest up to 10Gbps. I plan to do this with an SFP+ port when my network comes along. (As soon as MikroTik comes out with a decent 10G CCR router that is compatible with more >> SFPs.) >> >> >> >> In the mean time I will just test 1 Gbps speeds off a copper GE port, but want the SFP+ capability so I don't have to repurchase hardware in the next year. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> >> >> Lorell Hathcock >> >> Chief Technology Officer >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SolStar Network, LLC >> >> Communications >> >> FIBER - VOIP - SECURITY - TV >> >> FTTH - Commercial - Residential >> >> Burglar - Access Control >> >> 956-478-5955 (cell) - 956-316-4090 (main) >> >> <mailto:lorell@SolStarNetwork.com> lorell(a)SolStarNetwork.com >> >> <http://www.solstarnetwork.com/> www.SolStarNetwork.com >> >> TX License #B19998 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> El contenido del presente correo electrónico es de carácter confidencial, privado y propiedad de AXTEL, S.A.B. de C.V., por lo que en caso de haber recibido el presente por error, o de no ser el destinatario del mismo, por favor hágalo saber al remitente, e igualmente elimine y no almacene en forma alguna la información aquí contenida. Así mismo, el contenido del presente correo no genera obligación alguna a cargo de AXTEL, S.A.B. de C.V., de cualquiera de sus subsidiarias o del remitente.

2 1