- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: 10G tester recommendation
by Eric Litvin 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

Yes Darrell We have a 19" rackmount 1U optical channel monitoring. Unit plugs into the monitor port of the Mux and enables DWDM Channel Monitoring - i.e power levels and OSNR. It can be accessed remotely over SNMP. Regards, Eric Litvin 650 996 7270 Eric(a)lumaoptics.net PROGRAMMABLE SFP XFP QSFP CFP > On Mar 21, 2016, at 8:04 AM, Darrell Budic <budic(a)onholyground.com> wrote: > > Eric, saw this on the NANOG lists, figured I’d ask. I’m looking for a device to set on the monitor port of a DWDM mux and provide statistics over an attached network interface via SNMP or cli. Do you have such a product, or know of one? > > Thanks! > > -Darrell > > >> On Mar 20, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Eric Litvin <eric(a)lumaoptics.net> wrote: >> >> Manuel- my company, luma optics, has a handheld to offer at a very affordable price relative to the big brands. It would be my pleasure to follow up with you to discuss further. >> >> Regards >> >> Eric Litvin >> 650 996 7270 >> Eric(a)lumaoptics.net >> PROGRAMMABLE SFP XFP QSFP CFP & Optical Test Equipment >> >> >> >>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Manuel Marín <mmg(a)transtelco.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Nanog community >>> >>> >>> We are looking 10G testers for BER and RFC2544 tests and I was wondering if >>> additional to the JDSU/Viavi, is there something else that you can >>> recommend like Exfo, Fluke, etc? >>> >>> Your input will be appreciate it >>> >>> Thank you and have a great day >

1 0

Wireless (WiFi) MOS equivalent?
by Jim Wininger 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

Hello all, Is there a WiFi equivalent to the VoIP MOS score? We are looking for a way to measure performance of a fairly large WiFi deployment. We have 8000+ access points (All Cisco). WE have the standard Cisco tools for managing the wireless network (ISE, Prime etc). But we are coming up short with a way to “score” the network. Does anyone have experience with this that might be able to help? How do large conferences “measure” wireless service quality etc? We are already doing end user surveys etc. We have “soft date”, we really need data points. —Jim

5 4

10G tester recommendation
by Manuel Marín 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

Hi Nanog community We are looking 10G testers for BER and RFC2544 tests and I was wondering if additional to the JDSU/Viavi, is there something else that you can recommend like Exfo, Fluke, etc? Your input will be appreciate it Thank you and have a great day

2 1

Reminder of the L-Root IPv6 address renumbering
by David Soltero 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

This is reminder that there is a scheduled change to the IPv6 addresses for the L-Root server, that will take effect on March 23, 2016. The new IP addresses for the L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET will be: 199.7.83.42 2001:500:9f::42 Please remember to update your root “hints” files on your DNS infrastructure.

1 0

junkmailers take the day off....?
by Mike 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

Hi, This is not a complaint, but today seems to be a major disturbance in the force...my junkmail load seems to be WAAAYYYY down today, like they all are out at the beach or something... some major botnet get shutdown or something??? Mike

5 4

Re: CALEA Requirements
by Scott Weeks 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

--- lorell(a)hathcock.org wrote: From: "Lorell Hathcock" <lorell(a)hathcock.org> Can someone point me to the current CALEA requirements? As an ISP, should I be recording all internet traffic that passes my routers? Or do I only have to record when and if I receive a court order? I'm not under any court order now, I just want to be sure that I am compliant going forward in my capabilities. ----------------------------------------- This is something your company's lawyers should hash out. That said, you shouldn't record anything unless forced to do so. It'll just make pervasive surveillance easier. scott

5 4

www.cisco.com no resolve?
by Dmitry Sherman 19 Mar '16

19 Mar '16

dig www.cisco.com @8.8.8.8 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> www.cisco.com @8.8.8.8 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 60416 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.cisco.com. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: cisco.com. 1247 IN SOA edns-rtp5-1-l. postmaster.cisco.com. 16034550 7200 1800 864000 86400 ;; Query time: 94 msec ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) ;; WHEN: Sat Mar 19 07:36:22 2016 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 91 — Dmitry Sherman Interhost Networks Ltd dmitry(a)interhost.net office: 972-74-7029881 mobile: 972-54-3181182 http://www.interhost.co.il >

5 5

Cogent - Google - HE Fun
by Dennis Burgess 18 Mar '16

18 Mar '16

I just noticed that I am NOT getting IPV6 Google prefixes though Cogent at all. I was told google pulled all of their peering with Cogent? If I bring up a SIT tunnel with HE, I get the prefixes but at horrible speed and latency .. anyone else? [DennisBurgessSignature] www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> - 314-735-0270 x103 - dmburgess(a)linktechs.net<mailto:dmburgess@linktechs.net>

20 35

transferring [legacy] address space from arin to ripe
by Randy Bush 18 Mar '16

18 Mar '16

i have just finished $subject. arin and ripe host and admin folk were cooperative and helpful to the point of being embarrassing; dealing with me when the moon is in klutz has to be a major pita. but inter-rir transfer works, works well, and works for legacy space. we are continuing by bringing up an rpki CA under ripe's CA, step by step over the next couple of weeks. normally, it would be trivial; so to make it exciting, we are doing it with pilot versions of the ripe and dragon labs code bases which support the new rrdb [0], as well as rsync, propagation methods. i hope to report success in boring technical detail at the iepg meeting on 2016.04.03 in BA. but i thought it worth reporting that inter-rir transfer works and works well. thank you ripe and arin. randy [0] draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-01.txt

3 2

CALEA Requirements
by Lorell Hathcock 18 Mar '16

18 Mar '16

NANOG: Can someone point me to the current CALEA requirements? As an ISP, should I be recording all internet traffic that passes my routers? Or do I only have to record when and if I receive a court order? I'm not under any court order now, I just want to be sure that I am compliant going forward in my capabilities. Thanks! Lorell Hathcock

4 4