- Test - lists.nanog.org

GTT IPVPN - Vienna - Circuit offline since maintenance.
by Laurent Dumont 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

Hi everyone, We've have a IP-VPN circuit that has been down for the past 15 hours or so in Vienna. We are receiving the routes from the GTT BGP but we cant reach the equipment itself. GTT have confirmed a backbone issue but they have been unresponsive since. Anyone is aware of issues? Anyone from GTT can reach out off-list to figure out the status of the incident? Thanks

1 0

verizon wifi calling stopped working
by Sean Heskett 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

Hello, Is anyone from verizon wireless on here. clients across our network started complaining 2 weeks ago that wifi calling stopped working. below are some pings at traceroutes to wo.vzwwo.com which fail. the first set is with our normal DNS servers and the second set is using 8.8.8.8 Thanks, *Sean Heskett* *ZIRKEL Wireless * *High-Speed Internet for NW Colorado* 970-871-8500 x100 - Office 970-846-8065 - mobile 866-903-4628 - Fax Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless> MBP-Sean:~ sean$ ping wo.vzwwo.com PING wo.vzwwo.com (141.207.177.233): 56 data bytes Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 ^C --- wo.vzwwo.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss MBP-Sean:~ sean$ traceroute wo.vzwwo.com traceroute: Warning: wo.vzwwo.com has multiple addresses; using 141.207.177.233 traceroute to wo.vzwwo.com (141.207.177.233), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 192.168.12.1 (192.168.12.1) 0.810 ms 0.586 ms 0.571 ms 2 rtr-edge-rht.zirkelwireless.com (65.117.208.1) 1.547 ms 1.640 ms 1.550 ms 3 65-117-210-178.zirkelwireless.com (65.117.210.178) 2.494 ms 2.412 ms 2.249 ms 4 72-55-193-5.mammothnetworks.com (72.55.193.5) 5.149 ms 6.783 ms 5.540 ms 5 be5274.rcr21.b006467-6.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.140.187.145) 5.996 ms 5.880 ms 5.756 ms 6 be3414.ccr21.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.205) 6.072 ms be3415.ccr22.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.30.241) 6.252 ms be3414.ccr21.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.205) 6.203 ms 7 be3035.ccr21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.90) 17.542 ms be3036.ccr22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.31.90) 17.646 ms be3035.ccr21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.90) 17.038 ms 8 be2433.ccr32.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.213) 27.259 ms 27.265 ms be2432.ccr31.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.133) 27.198 ms 9 be2764.ccr41.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.47.214) 28.024 ms be2763.ccr41.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.74) 27.870 ms 27.955 ms 10 verizon.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.12.206) 27.478 ms 48.841 ms 40.085 ms 11 0.et-10-1-0.gw8.chi13.alter.net (140.222.236.209) 40.159 ms 0.et-11-3-0.gw8.chi13.alter.net (140.222.231.217) 39.879 ms 0.et-10-1-0.gw8.chi13.alter.net (140.222.236.209) 40.217 ms 12 * * * ^C MBP-Sean:~ sean$ ping wo.vzwwo.com PING wo.vzwwo.com (141.207.193.233): 56 data bytes Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 ^C --- wo.vzwwo.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss MBP-Sean:~ sean$ traceroute wo.vzwwo.com traceroute: Warning: wo.vzwwo.com has multiple addresses; using 141.207.193.233 traceroute to wo.vzwwo.com (141.207.193.233), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 192.168.12.1 (192.168.12.1) 0.896 ms 0.593 ms 0.583 ms 2 rtr-edge-rht.zirkelwireless.com (65.117.208.1) 1.453 ms 1.312 ms 1.181 ms 3 65-117-210-178.zirkelwireless.com (65.117.210.178) 2.446 ms 2.061 ms 2.237 ms 4 72-55-193-5.mammothnetworks.com (72.55.193.5) 5.152 ms 5.121 ms 5.124 ms 5 be5274.rcr21.b006467-6.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.140.187.145) 5.716 ms 5.748 ms 5.506 ms 6 be3414.ccr21.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.205) 5.919 ms be3415.ccr22.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.30.241) 6.004 ms be3414.ccr21.den01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.205) 7.184 ms 7 be3035.ccr21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.90) 17.233 ms be3036.ccr22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.31.90) 17.397 ms be3035.ccr21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.90) 17.859 ms 8 be2433.ccr32.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.213) 27.428 ms 27.476 ms be2432.ccr31.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.133) 27.606 ms 9 be2764.ccr41.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.47.214) 28.129 ms be2763.ccr41.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.74) 28.009 ms 27.497 ms 10 verizon.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.12.206) 27.402 ms 27.451 ms 27.445 ms 11 0.et-11-3-0.gw10.dfw7.alter.net (140.222.228.115) 29.849 ms 29.039 ms 0.et-10-1-0.gw10.dfw7.alter.net (140.222.0.113) 29.132 ms ^C MBP-Sean:~ sean$

3 3

MSN.com blocking some customers
by Josh Luthman 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

I have a couple of customers in a /23 (possibly a /24) seemingly random that aren't able to get to MSN.com - this is http://msn.com not the win32 app or O365 and such. Would there be someone that can reach out to me offlist to take a look at this? I have two verified cases for the last 4 days where every website works except for http://msn.com Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373

1 0

[OT?] Anyone else been contacted by networkequipment.net after commenting here?
by Brielle Bruns 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

So I decided to respond to a message earlier - was the first time in quite a while on the NANOG list. Like, we're talking maybe 3-6 months since my last post? This afternoon I get an e-mail from Brad Lovelace <brad(a)networkequipment.net> asking me if I have cisco, juniper, etc to sell to his company, claimed I have done business with him before (even though I've never sold any equipment to them, nor have we ever communicated before - my e-mail archives go back to 1996 or so). Isn't the first time I've been contacted by a networking gear vendor after they 'mysteriously' got my e-mail address (shortly after I posted a comment here) as someone who was interested in their wares. We may have someone scraping e-mail addresses and names from the nanog list - don't suppose the mods might be so gracious enough to look at the sub list and see if anyone from networkequipment.net is on here? Sorry in advance to go somewhat OT. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org

2 1

Re: [OT?] Anyone else been contacted by networkequipment.net after commenting here?
by Scott Weeks 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

--- bruns(a)2mbit.com wrote: From: Brielle Bruns <bruns(a)2mbit.com> RE shaming: networkequipment.net Isn't the first time I've been contacted by a networking gear vendor after they 'mysteriously' got my e-mail address (shortly after I posted a comment here) as someone who was interested in their wares. --------------------------------------------- We should get a list of these folks so we can look at it when we're buying so we don't purchase from these types of companies/people. scott

1 0

Anyone from Consolidated Communications here?
by Matt Larson 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

Could someone in operations from Consolidated Communications in Vermont please contact me off list, if possible? Thanks, Matt -- Matt Larson, VP of Research ICANN Office of the CTO

1 0

Re: It's been 20 years today (Oct 16, UTC). Hard to believe.
by Scott Weeks 17 Oct '18

17 Oct '18

--- rjoffe(a)centergate.com wrote: From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe(a)centergate.com> At NANOG two weeks ago, we had an interesting discussion at one of the lunch tables. One of the subjects we discussed was the original IANA, and RFC Editor, Jon Postel. Seven of the ten people at the table had never heard of him. Maybe these days it no longer matters who he was, and what he meant to where we are today. ------------------------------------------------ Wow, was it a table of folks new to network engineering? If so, then schooling; if not, then clue bat... :-) scott

12 17

Reno local fibre providers
by Mehmet Akcin 17 Oct '18

17 Oct '18

hi there, I am trying to help a good friend of mine to connect his office to a pop (in bay area most likely) so I am in the need of identifying some network providers in Reno who can provide this service. Currently charter and AT&T are onnet in the facility but the prices they are quoting is "out of this world" :) thank you for your help Mehmet

2 1

Youtube Outage
by Kenneth McRae 17 Oct '18

17 Oct '18

Is this widespread?

13 15

NAT on a Trident/Qumran(/or other?) equipped whitebox?
by Jason Lixfeld 16 Oct '18

16 Oct '18

Has anyone played around with this? Curious if the BCM (or whatever other chip) can do this, and if not, if any of the box vendors have tried to find a way to get these things to do a bunch of NAT - say some flavour of NAT, line-rate @ 10G. If so, anyone know of a NOS that has support for it? OcNOS, Cumulus Linux, PicOS and Switch Light OS seem to have none, but not sure if there are others out there. Thanks!

9 10