- Test - lists.nanog.org

Where you think the market/network will be heading
by lobna gouda 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

Hello Networks, Might sound unprofessional, but seriously Wanted to get your views about upcoming technlogies or market. Things like virtualization, cloud services , automation and SDN models and its use cases have actually done some shift, no much gap between ISP and DC tech. For example things like SDWAN, EVPN, SR...etc will end classical MPLS this is if you do not want to perform your own scripted PCEP and will be used in ISP, enterprise and DC If you would like to provide a good career advise for someone willing to change, is working in designing datacenter (learning storage, Virtulaztion, cloud services, LB...etc) or working in a mid-size company that is looking for its own solutions type of this and you will utilize your own skills differently and honestly you do not know what you would expect or learn What would you choose and have anyone went through this route before? what is your experience/advise?

2 1

L3 Network topology in YANG
by Yannis Mitsos 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

All, I was wondering if there is any network operator who exposes (dynamically?) its topology in YANG based on RFC8346 [1]. I understand that for commercial operators and purposes, may not be of any substantial value. We are assessing some available tools[2],[3],[4] on how to achieve this but we would like to know if there is any success story out there. Regards, Yannis [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8346 [2] https://github.com/robshakir/pyangbind [3] https://github.com/YangModels/yang.git [4] https://developer.cisco.com/site/ydk

2 2

Security Track @ NANOG 75 Call for Participation
by John Kristoff 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

[ Apologies if you saw this elsewhere already - jtk ] Friends, colleagues, fellow operators, The network security track, formerly known as the ISP security BoF, has plans to return at NANOG 75 in San Francisco February 18-20. I will be your track facilitator. I have a small handful of topics I'm soliciting from some folks directly, but options are good, and I may be missing something important. If you haven't heard from me already, then I want to hear your ideas or proposals. This is a good, casual place to go with netsec related ideas, tools, or case studies. Here is an incomplete list of relevant topics to stir your thoughts: * IRRs, BGPSEC, and RPKI * DDoS attacks and mitigation * Botnet case studies * ISP incident response tools * Network censorship and privacy * Threat sharing frameworks * Network equipment configuration/default BCPs * Spoofing, amplification, reflection threats * ...insert your idea here John

2 1

trace from behind tata noam
by Randy Bush 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

a host in as4128, 198.180.152.15, is having problems getting to stuff behind as6453 (tata). so i try to get an atlas traceroute toward 198.180.152.15 from as6453. but atlas whines Probes selection: Your selected ASN is not covered by our network so not even one measly probe. if anyone here is 'behind' 6453 en route 198.180.152.15, can you send a trace, please? thanks. randy

3 4

CLEC Lawyer - New Jersey
by Rod Beck 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

Hi, I need a lawyer who can get our company licensed as a CLEC in the state of New Jersey. Any suggestions appreciated? Roderick Beck Director of Global Sales United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com> New York City & Budapest rod.beck(a)unitedcablecompany.com 36-30-859-5144 [1467221477350_image005.png]

6 7

used hardware reseller
by Mehmet Akcin 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

Hi there I am looking to buy juniper qfx and some dwdm gear to be shipped overseas (indonesia, thailand, colombia, chile...) I am looking to see if therr are any preferred hardware resellers people would recommend? If you know a way to buy local that would be fantastic otherwise shipping it is the way to go. Please contact me offlist Mehmet -- Mehmet +1-424-298-1903

2 1

Call For Presentations - DNS-OARC Workshop, Thailand, Bangkok, 12th/13th May 2019
by Jake Zack 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

The 30th DNS-OARC Workshop will take place at the Shangri-La Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand, on May 12th and 13th 2019, hosted by ICANN. (Note that several co-located meetings are taking place immediately prior to the DNS-OARC Workshop, including the GDD Industry Summit, May 6th-9th, the Registrations Operations Workshop, May 9th, and the ICANN DNS Symposium, May 10th-11th.) The Workshop's Program Committee is now requesting proposals for presentations. All DNS-related subjects are welcome. A timeslot will also be available for lightning talks (5-10 minutes) on day two of the workshop for which submissions will be accepted until the start of the morning session on day two. There will be a Members-only session during the workshop, which will include reports on DNS-OARC's activities. If you are an OARC member and have a sensitive topic that you wish to present during that session those can be accommodated. Workshop Milestones: 05 Dec 2018 - Submissions open via Indico 22 Feb 2019 - Deadline for submission 01 Mar 2019 - Initial Contribution list published 22 Mar 2019 - Full agenda published 03 May 2019 - Deadline for slideset submission 12 May 2019 - Workshop Details for presentation submission are published here: https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/31/call-for-abstracts/ The workshop presentations will be organized by common themes, depending on the topics and the timing of each presentation. There are 30-minute and 15-minute slots, let us know your preference in your submission. To allow the Programme Committee to make objective assessments of submissions, so as to ensure the quality of the workshop, submissions SHOULD include slides. Draft slides are acceptable on submission. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissions(a)dns-oarc.net<mailto:submissions@dns-oarc.net> Jacob Zack, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact sponsor(a)dns-oarc.net<mailto:sponsor@dns-oarc.net> if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.)

1 0

Article On Google
by Rod Beck 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/12/10/the-friendship-that-made-goog… [https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5c0040d75cc0c92d353cfc9c/16:9/w_1200,h_6…]<https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/12/10/the-friendship-that-made-goog…> The Friendship That Made Google Huge | The New Yorker<https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/12/10/the-friendship-that-made-goog…> www.newyorker.com The Google campus, set beside a highway a few minutes from downtown Mountain View, is a series of squat, unattractive buildings with tinted windows. Roderick Beck Director of Global Sales United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com> New York City & Budapest rod.beck(a)unitedcablecompany.com 36-30-859-5144 [1467221477350_image005.png]

1 0

Verizon: Extremely Strange CPE Routing in NYC/NJ Area
by Nick Zurku 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

Can anyone from Verizon take a look at this behavior for us? We’re having multiple Verizon FiOS users in the NYC/NJ area appear to teleport from their FiOS router to our IP in the Pittsburgh region. Users are seeing extreme slowness with TCP traffic, but ping times seem reasonable. User 1: 1 fios_quantum_gateway (192.168.1.1) 1.575 ms 2.426 ms 3.193 ms 2 204.16.244.8 (204.16.244.8) 2.269 ms 3.055 ms 2.727 ms User 2: 1 fios_quantum_gateway (192.168.1.1) 1.565 ms 1.048 ms 0.947 ms 2 204.16.244.8 (204.16.244.8) 2.162 ms 3.588 ms 3.048 ms I can provide end-user NYC/NJ IPs off-list if desirable. Here's a normal looking trace from an FiOS line locally in the Pittsburgh region: IP: 108.39.229.34 Tracing route to four.libsyn.com [204.16.244.8] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 5 ms 2 ms 7 ms lo0-100.PITBPA-VFTTP-301.verizon-gni.net <http://lo0-100.pitbpa-vfttp-301.verizon-gni.net/> [108.39.229.1] 3 5 ms 6 ms 6 ms B3301.PITBPA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net <http://b3301.pitbpa-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net/> [100.41.223.244] 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 13 ms 12 ms 13 ms 0.et-7-1-5.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET <http://0.et-7-1-5.br1.iad8.alter.net/> [140.222.226.17] 7 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms verizon.com.customer.alter.net [152.179.50.110] 8 12 ms 12 ms 13 ms be3084.ccr42.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.30.65] 9 22 ms 22 ms 22 ms be2820.rcr21.pit02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.83.54] 10 22 ms 22 ms 21 ms 38.104.120.90 11 26 ms 21 ms 19 ms 204.16.241.133 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 204.16.244.8 Is this a possible traffic engineering blip? I can’t say we’ve ever seen trace routes return such sparse results and actually make it to the destination. -- Nick Zurku Systems Engineer TeraSwitch, Inc. Cell: 412-953-0481 Office: 412-945-7048 nzurku(a)teraswitch.com

4 3

GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge
by Brandon Wade 03 Dec '18

03 Dec '18

We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we now have a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We only purchase IP Transit services from them, nothing else, and have never had any fees tacked on top of our contracted agreed upon amount. Has anyone else ran into this? If this is a legit "surcharge" any idea of why we were never charged for that before? I figured I'd reach out to the community on this prior to jumping to further conclusions. -Brandon

15 20