- Test - lists.nanog.org

Crowdfunding critical infrastructure
by Eric S. Raymond 28 Jun '19

28 Jun '19

The members of this list are, I think, much more aware tham most that a lot of critical Internet software is maintained by unfunded volunteers, and of the systemic risks that result from this. I'm attacking the problem at the root, applying what the Internet has taught us about decentralization and avoidiing single poimts of failure. In part because I'm currently struggling with medical bills (nothing life-threatening, just ankle surgery) but I've been worrying about the larger problem for a decade. Please read http://loadsharers.net Of course I would like everyone on here to take the pledge and spread the word in technical communities where they have influence. But beyond that, there are several members of this list who are clearly qualified to join as advisers. We're going to need that as the Loadsharers network scales up. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> .. a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen... -- Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App.181)

10 26

Caching infrastructure
by Mehmet Akcin 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

Hello! If you have experience building and operating small caching boxes for cdns, or other type of dns services Please contact me offlist as i have some simple questions about them Thank you -- Mehmet +1-424-298-1903

1 0

Call for Presentations: 31st DNS-OARC Workshop, Austin, Texas, Oct 31 - Nov 01 2019
by Jake Zack 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

The 31st DNS-OARC Workshop will take place at the JW Marriott Austin in Austin, Texas, USA on October 31st and November 1st 2019. It is co-located with and will take place right after NANOG 77 (Oct 27th to Oct 30th 2019). The Workshop's Program Committee is now requesting proposals for presentations. All DNS-related subjects are welcome. A time slot will also be available for lightning talks (5-10 minutes each) on day two of the workshop, for which submissions will be accepted just before the start of the workshop and until the start of the morning break on day two. There will be an OARC Business and AGM session during the workshop, which will be for OARC Members only. If you are an OARC member and have a sensitive topic that you wish to present during that session those can be accommodated. Workshop Milestones: 25 Jun 2019 - Submissions open via Indico 16 Aug 2019 - Deadline for submission (midnight CDT) 28 Aug 2019 - Initial Contribution list published 28 Sep 2019 - Full agenda published 18 Oct 2019 - Deadline for slideset submission 31 Oct 2019 - Workshop Details for presentation submission are published here: <https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/32/call-for-abstracts/> The workshop presentations will be organized by common themes, depending on the topics and the timing of each presentation. There are 30-minute and 15-minute slots, let us know your preference in your submission. To allow the Programme Committee to make objective assessments of submissions, so as to ensure the quality of the workshop, submissions SHOULD include slides. Draft slides are acceptable on submission. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via <submissions(a)dns-oarc.net<mailto:submissions@dns-oarc.net>> Jacob Zack, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact <sponsor(a)dns-oarc.net<mailto:sponsor@dns-oarc.net>> if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.)

1 0

Re: Anyone from AT&T/AS7018 available?
by Francois Lecavalier 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

If it's to turn up a circuit I would say try these: I turned up BGP with Anthony once: ag2592(a)att.com<mailto:ag2592@att.com> And the next circuit I had to turn up I was stuck in a hurricane too, reached back to him, was away but was redirecting to his manager: mm2635(a)us.att.com<mailto:mm2635@us.att.com> I got a reply back within an hour that someone would take care of me and 2 hours later everything was resolved. I can't wait for the day I have to call in a circuit down... -Frank This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.

1 0

Comcast Outage - East Coast?
by John Von Essen 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

I just saw a 40% traffic drop on my routing core (East Coast based) across all my BGP peers. None of my transit peers flapped or had any issues other than the traffic drop. Almost all the complaints of connectivity issues were people using Comcast, so right now thats the only common thread. Anyone else see this? It appears to have resolved after about 5 mins. -John

1 0

Bestel/AS18734 Contact
by Christopher Smalling 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

Does anyone have a contact for Bestel/AS18734? We've been having peering issues with them on and off for a while now, and can't seem to get any response through their contacts listed with ARIN or on PeeringDB. Calls to support are fruitless, with nobody knowing where to direct us. -- Chris Smalling Network Operations NeoNova

1 1

Anyone from AT&T/AS7018 available?
by Christopher Rogers 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

I'm a customer of 7018 and am currently struggling to get anyone to look at a bgp misconfiguration within 7018- it's like pissing into a hurricane. If anyone is available could you kindly ping me offlist? cheers -chris

5 5

Re: FCC workshop: Security vulnerabilities within our communications networks
by Scott Weeks 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

--- sean(a)donelan.com wrote: From: Sean Donelan <sean(a)donelan.com> If they come up with a better idea, that's great. I'll take good ideas from anywere. ------------------------------------ FCC. gov't. Design by committee. Never seen good design come out of these, but like Chris said, maybe today's the day... </smirk> ;-) scott

2 1

FCC workshop: Security vulnerabilities within our communications networks
by Sean Donelan 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

Federal Communications Commissioner Geoffrey Starks is holding a workshop next week, June 27, 2019, to hear from interested parties on how to address the national security threats posed by insecure equipment within our communications networks. https://www.fcc.gov/document/commr-starks-announces-june-27-public-workshop… Panel 1: Find It – The Scope of the Problem This panel will focus on how to identify which equipment poses a threat and where it is located. Panel 2: Fix It – How to Ensure that Networks are Secure This panel will consider options for fixing identified security problems, including discussion of what equipment needs to be fixed, whether replacing equipment is the best approach, or whether monitoring or other measures can be part of the solution. Panel 3: Fund It – National Problems Require National Solutions This panel will address questions regarding funding, including the amount required for equipment replacement and threat mitigation, pote

4 6

Issue with point to point VPNs behind NAT and asymmetric traffic
by Anurag Bhatia 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

Hello everyone, Trying to get my head around a certain unexpected behaviour. I am running two site to site VPNs (wireguard now, OpenVPN earlier) between my home and a remote server over two different WAN links. Both WAN links are just consumer connections - one with public IP and one with CGNATed IP. The redundancy here is taken care of by the OSPF running via FRR on both ends. The unexpected behaviour I get is that if I set OSPF cost to prefer say link1 between home -> server and prefer link 2 between server -> home then connectivity completely breaks between the routed pools. The point to point IPs stay reachable (which is over expected links i.e symmetric via both ends). As long as both ends prefer link1 or link2, it works fine. At first, I thought it had to do something with NAT but still can't understand how. Since VPN tunnels have a keep-alive timer (for 10 seconds), the tunnel is always up. Any idea why asymmetric packets are being dropped here? This exact behaviour was in case of earlier OpenVPN + bird + iBGP and is still the same when I moved everything to Wireguard for VPN + FRR for routing + OSPF. Thanks. -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com

6 8