- Test - lists.nanog.org

Disney+ Geolocation Issues
by Mat Perkins 13 Nov '19

13 Nov '19

Hey Everyone, I'm working with 3 ISPs currently who are having Geo Location issues with clients being told they are out of the US. When their IPs are checked via a free Geo IP tool everything is showing up correctly. Anyone have any insight on who Disney+ is using for their GeoLocation services and if anyone here can help out with getting updated to be in the correct location / type of service provider? Mat

1 0

Re: Disney+ Streaming
by Clayton Zekelman 12 Nov '19

12 Nov '19

At 03:17 PM 12/11/2019, Brian J. Murrell wrote: >Fair enough, in the cases where operators are Netflix OC partners and >might see a shift in network use from a Netflic OC appliance to >external their network to other streaming services. > >But for an operator who doesn't have an OC Appliances, is there likely >to be much difference? I suppose that was the context I was thinking >in. Sure. You could see changes in where traffic comes from. It may shift from peering to transit. >That said, I (admittedly, idly) wonder what percentage of users (world- >wide, by nation, geographical area, etc.) are served by OC Appliances. >I really have no clue as to the penetration of OC Appliances. OCAs make a huge difference in our network. Between the two ASs we operate in different regions - to the tune of maybe 40 Gbps. -- Clayton Zekelman Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi) 3363 Tecumseh Rd. E Windsor, Ontario N8W 1H4 tel. 519-985-8410 fax. 519-985-8409

1 0

Re: Disney+ Streaming
by Clayton Zekelman 12 Nov '19

12 Nov '19

Netflix has done a great job deploying OC Appliances. A Netflix user != Amazon, Hulu, etc... At 02:58 PM 12/11/2019, Brian J. Murrell wrote: >On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 19:49 +0000, Justin Krejci wrote: > > > > As the service grows in popularity, and its breadth of content and > > manageable price is likely to attract a lot of growth, I'd like to > > plan for any necessary augmentations to the network. > > From the end-user/viewer network capacity perspective is a new >streaming service likely to (significantly) "add new viewers" or more >likely to just shift existing viewers away from an existing service >(i.e Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, etc.) to Disney, resulting in a net-wash >from the end-user/viewer network capacity perspective? > >I guess the question is, will Disney content compel users who are not >already streaming to start streaming? > >Cheers, >b. > > -- Clayton Zekelman Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi) 3363 Tecumseh Rd. E Windsor, Ontario N8W 1H4 tel. 519-985-8410 fax. 519-985-8409

2 1

How can CDN and Cloud providers effectively contribute to routing security?
by Andrei Robachevsky 12 Nov '19

12 Nov '19

Hello, Following up on my lightning talk at NANOG77 (https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG77/2147/20191030_Robach…) here is the draft MANRS action set for CDN and Cloud operators: https://www.manrs.org/cdn-cloud-providers/cfc-draft-action-set/ Your feedback is welcome, please send it to: manrs-cdn-cloud(a)elists.isoc.org You can also provide your feedback by participating in a 5-min survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/8LXV9W2 Please read the full document first - as the survey provides a very abbreviated version of the Actions. And please provide your contact info, so we can reach out to you for additional info, especially if you disagree with the wording of the Actions. Thanks, Andrei

1 0

AS136165 103.100.107.0/24
by Radu Anghel 12 Nov '19

12 Nov '19

Hi all, Any idea what is wrong/happening with AS136165 103.100.107.0/24? https://stat.ripe.net/103.100.107.0%2F24#tabId=routing 240k announces & 30k withdraws / hour continuously since Friday seems a bit much. Radu

2 1

Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-v6-21.txt> (Operational Security Considerations for (fwd)
by valdis.kletnieks＠vt.edu 12 Nov '19

12 Nov '19

Those of you who worry about opsec for IPv6 but aren't already following this IETF draft may wish to get your comments in.

1 0

RE: AS136165 103.100.107.0/24
by Mathew Heard 12 Nov '19

12 Nov '19

Hi Radu, Maintainer of that range. Currently it's unallocated, pending reallocation to a new product line shortly. It's not announced by us. It appears China Mobile (AS40676 <https://bgp.he.net/AS40676>) attempted theft via unauthorized announcement (RADB listed). I've just enabled RPKI & ROA on that range. Thanks for the notification, sorry for the delay it came indirect as we are not a member here. For further correspondence could I perhaps request a contact at the technical contact or abuse contact for the range. Regards, Mathew

1 0

Any info on devices that are running eBGP on the Internet?
by Compton, Rich A 11 Nov '19

11 Nov '19

Hi, I am working with MANRS (https://www.manrs.org) on a tool for checking router configs for BGP security / spoofing prevention (e.g. uRPF) https://github.com/manrs-tools/MANRS-validator We are wondering if there is any research on the percentages of different types of devices running BGP on the Internet. Something like: Cisco IOS 30% Junos 30% Mikrotik 20% etc… We are looking to focus our tool on the most prevalent types of devices doing BGP (and the most prevalent with BGP security/spoofing issues) so that we can have the greatest impact. Does anyone have any information on this or know where I can obtain this information? Thanks in advance! -Rich E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.

10 10

AWS GeoDNS and Routing...
by John Von Essen 08 Nov '19

08 Nov '19

If anyone from AWS Networking Engineering is here, it would be great if you could chime in. I work for a very large search engine, hosted in AWS. Right around Oct 31st/Nov 1st, we noticed a significant change/re-routing of traffic that normally goes to Virginia to either California or Europe. All of our stats and pixel data indicate that approx 6-7% of our us-east-1 inbound traffic (we use Route53, Geo DNS, performance based routing, so lowest latency) was migrated to us-west-1 (Cali) and eu-west-1 (Ireland). If we used pure Geo-based routing, I could make the argument that there was some major Geo IP database update, but we performance based routing based in lowest latency. I realize that still depends on some data sets, and maybe those data sets got updated, or maybe the traffic was specifically re-routed due to some other kind of transit issue? This isn’t critical, but its a head scratcher… Thanks John Von Essen

1 0

all major US carriers received text messages overnight that appear to have been sent around Valentine's Day 2019
by Chris Kimball 08 Nov '19

08 Nov '19

Does anyone have any more information on this? Users on Twitter report that T-Mobile said "that there is a known issue of texts being resent/spoofed and said not to worry about it." https://twitter.com/ThelocalfilmMN/status/1192434609197375488 https://investors.sprint.com/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-d… thoughts? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential, and the message is for the use of intended recipients only. If you are not the intended recipient, do not disseminate, copy, or disclose this communication or its contents. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify me by replying to the email or call MIS Alliance at 617-500-1700 and permanently delete this communication.

23 25