- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

CAIDA selected by FCC for internet performance measurement
by Sean Donelan 12 Aug '16

12 Aug '16

CAIDA has submitted to the FCC its initial proposal for measuring internet interconnection point performance metrics as part of the AT&T/DirecTV merger conditions. http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0812/DA-16-9…

1 0

Weekly Routing Table Report
by cscora＠apnic.net 12 Aug '16

12 Aug '16

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfsinoz(a)gmail.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 13 Aug, 2016 Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 605983 Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS): 219519 Deaggregation factor: 2.76 Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets): 296865 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 54571 Prefixes per ASN: 11.10 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 36463 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 15482 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 6484 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 174 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.3 Max AS path length visible: 54 Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 55644) 51 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 65 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 16 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 15008 Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 11624 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 46222 Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 27 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 366 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2823070052 Equivalent to 168 /8s, 68 /16s and 161 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 76.3 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 76.3 Percentage of available address space allocated: 100.0 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 98.2 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 197230 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 155411 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 42917 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 3.62 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 168363 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 68727 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 5192 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 32.43 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 1174 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 929 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 54 Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 2288 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 759458116 Equivalent to 45 /8s, 68 /16s and 105 /24s APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319, 58368-59391, 63488-64098, 64297-64395, 131072-137529 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 36/8, 39/8, 42/8, 43/8, 49/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 101/8, 103/8, 106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8, 163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 182946 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 89491 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.04 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 188570 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 88668 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 16255 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 11.60 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 5747 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1702 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.8 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 23 Number of ARIN region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 1388 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 1105635168 Equivalent to 65 /8s, 230 /16s and 167 /24s ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959, 46080-47103 53248-55295, 62464-63487, 64198-64296, 393216-397212 ARIN Address Blocks 3/8, 4/8, 6/8, 7/8, 8/8, 9/8, 11/8, 12/8, 13/8, 15/8, 16/8, 17/8, 18/8, 19/8, 20/8, 21/8, 22/8, 23/8, 24/8, 26/8, 28/8, 29/8, 30/8, 32/8, 33/8, 34/8, 35/8, 38/8, 40/8, 44/8, 45/8, 47/8, 48/8, 50/8, 52/8, 53/8, 54/8, 55/8, 56/8, 57/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, 66/8, 67/8, 68/8, 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, 72/8, 73/8, 74/8, 75/8, 76/8, 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, 99/8, 100/8, 104/8, 107/8, 108/8, 128/8, 129/8, 130/8, 131/8, 132/8, 134/8, 135/8, 136/8, 137/8, 138/8, 139/8, 140/8, 142/8, 143/8, 144/8, 146/8, 147/8, 148/8, 149/8, 152/8, 155/8, 156/8, 157/8, 158/8, 159/8, 160/8, 161/8, 162/8, 164/8, 165/8, 166/8, 167/8, 168/8, 169/8, 170/8, 172/8, 173/8, 174/8, 184/8, 192/8, 198/8, 199/8, 204/8, 205/8, 206/8, 207/8, 208/8, 209/8, 214/8, 215/8, 216/8, RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 145178 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 71583 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 2.03 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 155202 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 96113 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18111 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 8.57 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 7832 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3026 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 27 Number of RIPE region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 4998 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 706273664 Equivalent to 42 /8s, 24 /16s and 225 /24s RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055, 47104-52223, 56320-58367 59392-61439, 61952-62463, 64396-64495 196608-207259 RIPE Address Blocks 2/8, 5/8, 25/8, 31/8, 37/8, 46/8, 51/8, 62/8, 77/8, 78/8, 79/8, 80/8, 81/8, 82/8, 83/8, 84/8, 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8, 89/8, 90/8, 91/8, 92/8, 93/8, 94/8, 95/8, 109/8, 141/8, 145/8, 151/8, 176/8, 178/8, 185/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/8, 195/8, 212/8, 213/8, 217/8, LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 61758 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 12273 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 5.03 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 77094 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 36939 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2470 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 31.21 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 555 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 581 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.8 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 24 Number of LACNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 2706 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 170203968 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 37 /16s and 27 /24s LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, 52224-53247, 61440-61951, 64099-64197, 262144-265628 + ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 177/8, 179/8, 181/8, 186/8, 187/8, 189/8, 190/8, 191/8, 200/8, 201/8, AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 14402 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 3245 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.44 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 16388 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 6087 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 738 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 22.21 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 174 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 177 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 20 Number of AfriNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 244 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 81167616 Equivalent to 4 /8s, 214 /16s and 133 /24s AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887, 327680-328703 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 102/8, 105/8, 154/8, 196/8, 197/8, APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4538 5544 4190 74 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 7545 3483 385 256 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 4766 3192 11145 1127 KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom, KR 17974 2939 904 78 TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indo 9829 2633 1491 518 BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone, IN 9808 2143 8781 42 CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication 4755 2056 429 225 TATACOMM-AS TATA Communications formerl 4808 1797 2300 543 CHINA169-BJ China Unicom Beijing Provin 24560 1532 505 217 AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti Airtel Ltd 38197 1505 93 289 SUNHK-DATA-AS-AP Sun Network (Hong Kong Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-APNIC ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 22773 3498 2964 144 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 6389 2227 3671 41 BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc., 18566 2195 405 110 MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath Corporation, US 20115 1937 1965 403 CHARTER-NET-HKY-NC - Charter Communicat 30036 1757 345 267 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS - Mediacom 209 1717 5083 658 CENTURYLINK-US-LEGACY-QWEST - Qwest Com 6983 1687 849 228 ITCDELTA - Earthlink, Inc., US 16509 1376 2482 449 AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US 7018 1344 20054 998 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T Services, Inc., US 701 1290 10719 696 UUNET - MCI Communications Services, In Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-ARIN RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 39891 3329 169 15 ALJAWWALSTC-AS , SA 20940 2740 1052 1947 AKAMAI-ASN1 , US 34984 1976 327 357 TELLCOM-AS , TR 12479 1313 1018 45 UNI2-AS , ES 8551 1213 377 46 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Interne 6849 1148 355 21 UKRTELNET , UA 13188 1095 98 63 BANKINFORM-AS , UA 8402 1010 544 15 CORBINA-AS Russia, RU 9198 971 352 25 KAZTELECOM-AS , KZ 6830 884 2752 463 LGI-UPC formerly known as UPC Broadband Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-RIPE LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 10620 3460 540 170 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 8151 2265 3361 544 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 7303 1531 949 243 Telecom Argentina S.A., AR 6503 1415 437 54 Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V., MX 11830 1342 368 64 Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad 6147 1093 377 27 Telefonica del Peru S.A.A., PE 3816 1003 480 178 COLOMBIA TELECOMUNICACIONES S.A. ESP, C 7738 994 1882 40 Telemar Norte Leste S.A., BR 11172 906 125 76 Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V., MX 28573 895 2179 162 CLARO S.A., BR Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-LACNIC AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 24863 1184 402 48 LINKdotNET-AS, EG 36903 656 330 109 MT-MPLS, MA 37611 652 48 2 Afrihost, ZA 36992 539 1357 26 ETISALAT-MISR, EG 8452 513 1472 15 TE-AS TE-AS, EG 37492 392 246 69 ORANGE-TN, TN 24835 346 610 16 RAYA-AS, EG 29571 300 37 12 CITelecom-AS, CI 15399 293 35 6 WANANCHI-KE, KE 2018 265 327 74 TENET-1, ZA Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-AFRINIC Global Per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4538 5544 4190 74 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 22773 3498 2964 144 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 7545 3483 385 256 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 10620 3460 540 170 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 39891 3329 169 15 ALJAWWALSTC-AS , SA 4766 3192 11145 1127 KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom, KR 17974 2939 904 78 TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indo 20940 2740 1052 1947 AKAMAI-ASN1 , US 9829 2633 1491 518 BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone, IN 8151 2265 3361 544 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 22773 3498 3354 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 39891 3329 3314 ALJAWWALSTC-AS , SA 10620 3460 3290 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 7545 3483 3227 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 17974 2939 2861 TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indo 6389 2227 2186 BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc., 9829 2633 2115 BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone, IN 9808 2143 2101 CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication 18566 2195 2085 MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath Corporation, US 4766 3192 2065 KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom, KR Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-CIDRnet List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 65001 PRIVATE 5.143.176.0/20 15468 KLGELECS-AS 38, Teatralnaya st 65001 PRIVATE 31.172.192.0/20 15468 KLGELECS-AS 38, Teatralnaya st 65001 PRIVATE 31.172.192.0/21 15468 KLGELECS-AS 38, Teatralnaya st 65001 PRIVATE 31.172.200.0/21 15468 KLGELECS-AS 38, Teatralnaya st 65001 PRIVATE 31.172.208.0/21 15468 KLGELECS-AS 38, Teatralnaya st 65001 PRIVATE 31.172.216.0/21 15468 KLGELECS-AS 38, Teatralnaya st 65000 PRIVATE 31.219.177.0/25 8966 ETISALAT-AS P.O. Box 1150, Dub 65000 PRIVATE 31.219.177.128/25 8966 ETISALAT-AS P.O. Box 1150, Dub 65412 PRIVATE 41.89.7.0/24 36866 JTL, KE 65512 PRIVATE 45.252.244.0/24 45899 VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-badAS Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 23.249.144.0/20 40430 COLO4JAX-AS - colo4jax, LLC, US 27.100.7.0/24 56096 UNKNOWN 41.73.1.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.73.2.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.73.3.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.73.4.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.73.5.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.73.6.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.73.7.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.73.8.0/24 37004 -Reserved AS-, ZZ Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-add-IANA Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:16 /9:13 /10:36 /11:101 /12:266 /13:518 /14:1051 /15:1771 /16:13146 /17:7828 /18:12740 /19:25283 /20:38406 /21:40068 /22:67238 /23:59029 /24:336803 /25:570 /26:584 /27:382 /28:54 /29:32 /30:14 /31:1 /32:33 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 39891 2896 3329 ALJAWWALSTC-AS , SA 22773 2728 3498 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 18566 2087 2195 MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath Corporation, US 30036 1570 1757 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS - Mediacom 6389 1438 2227 BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc., 10620 1387 3460 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 6983 1338 1687 ITCDELTA - Earthlink, Inc., US 34984 1259 1976 TELLCOM-AS , TR 11492 1180 1278 CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC., US 6849 968 1148 UKRTELNET , UA Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-sXXas-nos Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 1:1616 2:763 4:21 5:2138 6:31 8:987 12:1767 13:43 14:1750 15:45 16:2 17:91 18:123 20:49 22:1 23:1595 24:1799 27:2304 31:1775 32:69 33:3 34:2 35:5 36:323 37:2307 38:1243 39:35 40:94 41:2838 42:449 43:1859 44:43 45:2152 46:2541 47:85 49:1189 50:901 51:12 52:544 54:345 55:7 56:7 57:42 58:1638 59:980 60:364 61:1811 62:1504 63:1925 64:4548 65:2177 66:4259 67:2206 68:1129 69:3261 70:1250 71:485 72:2013 74:2546 75:347 76:393 77:1445 78:1263 79:860 80:1274 81:1398 82:978 83:712 84:849 85:1615 86:486 87:1096 88:543 89:2117 90:213 91:6087 92:979 93:2369 94:2448 95:2496 96:498 97:353 98:949 99:41 100:78 101:1085 103:11912 104:2542 105:124 106:438 107:1329 108:647 109:2252 110:1279 111:1658 112:1041 113:1243 114:1079 115:1667 116:1629 117:1543 118:2018 119:1585 120:926 121:1111 122:2260 123:2005 124:1587 125:1805 128:667 129:425 130:410 131:1353 132:628 133:172 134:471 135:141 136:384 137:394 138:1811 139:421 140:549 141:452 142:660 143:935 144:729 145:164 146:932 147:654 148:1391 149:538 150:645 151:872 152:637 153:300 154:649 155:961 156:519 157:492 158:382 159:1144 160:510 161:731 162:2375 163:559 164:903 165:1073 166:323 167:1166 168:2020 169:664 170:1850 171:254 172:664 173:1661 174:758 175:699 176:1726 177:4079 178:2212 179:1176 180:2146 181:1823 182:2012 183:966 184:821 185:7139 186:3096 187:2129 188:2171 189:1721 190:7733 191:1263 192:9007 193:5733 194:4437 195:3848 196:1725 197:1126 198:5543 199:5741 200:7157 201:3644 202:10133 203:9805 204:4499 205:2712 206:2974 207:3091 208:4053 209:3877 210:3873 211:2047 212:2726 213:2366 214:866 215:69 216:5870 217:1976 218:796 219:609 220:1638 221:868 222:689 223:1257 End of report

1 0

nxdomain rfc2308 type 2, but authority is incorrect
by Joe Maimon 11 Aug '16

11 Aug '16

www.kissimmee.org Windows 2008 dns cannot resolve it. BIND can. Windows appears to believe the rfc2308 type 2 response, even though recursing the CNAME results in a different authority, ns, and A response, which I assuming is why BIND returns the answer. I must be missing a switch somewhere. Any pointers would be appreciated.

4 10

Hosting recommendations
by Andy Ringsmuth 11 Aug '16

11 Aug '16

Fellow NANOGers, I realize the list rules prohibit people advertising/pushing their own products or companies, so I hope this doesn’t break that rule by asking. I’d like some recommendations for a solid hosting provider. Nothing hugely extensive. About 50 IMAP email users, basic web hosting for a few domains, some mailman lists and that’s about it. I’ve had us with our current host for several years but their e-mail infrastructure has been increasingly unreliable the last couple years. I don’t really want to go through the headache of switching providers but if it means less problems down the road, I’ll definitely do it. I have self-hosted in the past but it was a big enough challenge that I won’t go that route again. So, what do y’all recommend for a solid provider? Thank you in advance! ---- Andy Ringsmuth andy(a)newslink.com News Link – Manager Travel, Technology & Facilities 2201 Winthrop Rd., Lincoln, NE 68502-4158 (402) 475-6397 (402) 304-0083 cellular

1 0

Best practices for telcoflex -48VDC cabling & other power OSI layer 1
by Eric Kuhnke 10 Aug '16

10 Aug '16

Hey all, I'm looking for a document or set of photos/presentation on best practices for telcoflex/-48VDC power cabling installation. Labeling, routing, organization and termination, etc. Or a recommendation on a printed book that covers this topic. Not necessarily fully oldschool "we're going to teach all the technicians how to do the kansas city stitch" stuff, but the sort of thing that's applicable in a modern colo/IP network environment.

5 5

RFC6598 in AWS?
by Arlington Albertson 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

Hey folks, We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd experienced using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS? Thanks, -AA

3 3

Best practices for tracking intra-facility crossconnects
by Eric Kuhnke 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

Hey all, I am looking to see what the community's experience has been with different types of labeling systems and XC tracking systems for intra-facility crossconnects. In addition to the standard practice of labeling every fiber at both ends, if you're using a system that wraps a cable marker around the cable every 3 ft/1 meter, what type of system are you using to track XCs? If you have implemented a standards-based system with some type of GUID for every cable, and a unique per-cable tracking system that is utilized with a ticketing system for each distinct cable (whether -48VDC, fiber, cat5e, alarm wire, whatever), what did you have to customize for your needs? If you have implemented such a system in an older facility where every cable did not previously have a unique ID#, what hiccups did you run into? If you were designing such a system from a 'green field' approach for a brand new datacenter/colo/IX facility that is yet to be constructed, what would you do differently (both at OSI layer 1, and in the operational support software tracking the XCs?)

2 1

[NANOG-announce] 2016 NANOG General Elections and Committee Selection
by Daniel Golding 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

NANOG Members and Participants, We are once again approaching the annual NANOG election <http://nanog.org/elections/2016/general> and appointment time. Board candidate nominations open August 15th and the complete Election timeline can be found here <http://nanog.org/elections/2016/general>. We encourage those in the community who are not currently NANOG members to consider becoming members of NANOG and to participate in the election process. Through membership and voting, you will be an active participant in directing all NANOG activities. Only NANOG members are eligible to vote and serve in the NANOG Board of Directors and Committees. Click here <https://www.nanog.org/membership> to become a member today! **If you are not a member and wish to vote in this election, your membership must be received by 12:00 p.m. Central Time on Friday October 14, 2016.** Why? If you care about NANOG and think that you would like to take a turn at volunteering your time to help make it better, please consider joining as a member and taking part in the election and nomination process. If you know someone else that you believe would be interested in serving on the Board of Directors, nominate them by completing the Online Process <https://www.bigpulse.com/127736/register> beginning August 15, 2016. Any questions should be submitted to elections(a)nanog.org. As NANOG continues to evolve, our Board of Directors and Committees will continue to play an increasingly important role in our success. By joining now, you can be an integral part of the process. For more information about the role of a Board of Director or any Committee Member, or to find out more about what's involved in serving, please consult the current NANOG Bylaws <http://nanog.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/NANOG-Bylaws-Octob…> or follow the links to the Board and Committee pages from the General 2016 NANOG Elections Page <https://www.nanog.org/elections/2016/general>. Best regards, Daniel Golding *Chair, NANOG Board of Directors* _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)mailman.nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

calling a routing deep diver in as12369
by Randy Bush 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

hi. i would really appreciate a conversation with a routing geek in 12369. research measurements have raised some questions, and we would love an inside clue. thanks. randy

1 1

Google compute engine private ASNs
by Lee Fuller 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

Hey, first post so sorry if it's misguided. I'm curious about the BGP implementation in Google compute engine that allows you to define routing policy using private ASN numbers. How similar is it in terms of learning about BGP as a broader concept, or is it all smoke and mirrors? I'm not in a position where iBGP would benefit me in any other context than learning so I'm keen not to bother if it's too abstracted from a real world scenario. Lee Fuller (mobile) PGP Fingerprint: 4ACAEBA4B9EE1B3A075034302D5C3D050E6ED55A

3 3