- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Google Security Contact
by Ken Gilmour 09 Jun '17

09 Jun '17

Hi, There is a potential vulnerability in Gmail / Google Inbox which I need to discuss and verify with the Google Security Team. Is there anyone on that team here on NANOG who can contact me off-list please? Best to contact me at kg(a)invinsec.com. Thanks! Ken

1 0

Re: IPv4 Hijacking For Idiots
by Scott Weeks 08 Jun '17

08 Jun '17

--- s(a)xopher.net wrote: From: Scott Christopher <s(a)xopher.net> I think the solution is legislation + regulations. --------------------------------- For sure dude, because, you know, they do such a great job of all the other stuff they touch! scott ps. NOT!

2 1

DMCA processing software
by Jason Baugher 08 Jun '17

08 Jun '17

I'm curious what people are using to manage DMCA takedown notices in mid-sized networks. I've been searching, and have found the ACNS spec, and a few obscure references to an RT plugin, but not much else. As the ISP I work for grows, manual handling of notices is starting to be a problem. I'd prefer something open-source so we can extend it to hook into our other systems, but primarily I need something to parse the notice emails, store the information, track the number of incidents over time, and generate letters to users. If nothing exists, and everyone just has in-house proprietary systems, then we'll start down the same road, but I don't like to re-invent the wheel if I can help it. Thanks

4 3

Proxying NetFlow traffic correctly
by Sami 08 Jun '17

08 Jun '17

Hello, I have been searching for a solution that collects/duplicates NetFlow traffic properly for a while but i couldn't find any. Do you know any good unix alternative to ntopng, flowd, flow-tools? nprobe of netflow seems to be the closest one to fit my needs but i want to see if there are any other solution. My goal is to centralize NetFlow traffic into a single machine and then proxy some flows to other destinations for further analysis Best Regards, Sami

8 8

Re: Merit RADB support
by Chuck Anderson 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 12:08:50PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:41:16AM -0500, Kaiser, Erich wrote: > > Anyone gonna email me back from RADB support? > > In my experience, no. Apologies to Merit RADB, it was BGPmon that never responds. Merit RADB actually does respond--my frustration is more about the difficulty in getting them to delete stale objects that others registered, although I was finally able to get my objects cleaned up.

4 3

Spectrum TV authentication failures
by Jay R. Ashworth 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

NANOG is probably not the optimal venue for looking into auth failures on the IPTV service which Spectrum/Charter/TWC/BH's TV app for Android uses (which are legion), even though it probably uses RADIUS to get the work done. Anyone got a pointer to a better venue for such questions? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274

1 1

Merit RADB support
by Kaiser, Erich 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

Anyone gonna email me back from RADB support? Erich Kaiser The Fusion Network erich(a)gotfusion.net Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291

2 1

Telxius AS12956
by Marco Paesani 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

Hi, I need a peering contact for Telxius, can you help me ? Thanks ! kind regards, Marco Paesani Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Email: marco(a)paesani.it

1 0

AT&T Broken Uverse IPv6 routing.
by Brandon Jackson 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

Sorry for the noise but normal support channels are not understanding IPv6 is broken, they just see IPv4 works. Can anyone contact me or maybe provide a contact or pass this along to someone in ATT who can deal with broken IPv6 routing for Uverse Res/Small Biz IPv6 blocks that are being assigned. For Example one block that was delegated via DHCP-DP is 2600:1700:8250:8390::/60 tracing to it from anywhere outside of AT&T gets a "Destination net unreachable". Note this seems to have going on since atleast the 31st but likely longer, that's just when the gateway was updated to DHCP-PD from 6rd. 3 Examples of traces below. Note even 2001:506:7825:839::1 seems to issues with connectivity but it might not matter as much as that just the "WAN" of the gateway. >From an HE.net connection 2 ge5-4.core1.ash1.he.net (2001:470:0:90::1) 25.200 ms 24.878 ms 24.650 ms 3 100ge3-1.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:299::2) 33.407 ms 25.643 ms 25.245 ms 4 as7018-att.10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:1dd::2) 29.880 ms !N 32.288 ms !N 31.917 ms !N >From Cogent Looking Glass in ATL traceroute to 2600:1700:8250:8390::1 (2600:1700:8250:8390::1), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 2001:550:1:310::1 (2001:550:1:310::1) 0.989 ms 0.992 ms 2 te0-18-0-2.ccr42.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:2fc5) 0.983 ms 0.990 ms 3 be2848.ccr41.atl04.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:676) 2.018 ms be2790.ccr22.atl02.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:1ba6) 1.191 ms 4 2001:1890:1fff:501:192:205:36:237 (2001:1890:1fff:501:192:205:36:237) 8.640 ms !N 2001:550:3::166 (2001:550:3::166) 8.270 ms !N >From Sprint Looking Glass in ATL traceroute6 to 2600:1700:8250:8390::1 (2600:1700:8250:8390::1) from 2600:0:1:1239:144:228:243:98, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 sl-mst50-atl-ae10.0.v6.sprintlink.net (2600:0:2:1239:144:232:14:86) 0.635 ms 0.551 ms 0.457 ms 2 2600:0:3:1239:144:232:0:6a (2600:0:3:1239:144:232:0:6a) 6.672 ms !N 7.277 ms !N 7.984 ms !N

2 1

NANOG70 tee shirt mystery
by Matthew Petach 06 Jun '17

06 Jun '17

So, I've been staring at the NANOG70 tee shirt for a bit now: https://flic.kr/p/VejX5y and I have to admit, I'm a bit stymied. Usually, the tee-shirts are somewhat referential to the location or to a particular event; but this one is leaving me scratching my head. Is it perhaps a shot of the network engineering "Ooops (I broke the network again)" concert tour? Or is there some other cultural reference at play that I'm not aware of? Enquiring minds want to know!(tm). :) Matt

7 6