- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Poor speed to AWS
by Eric Dugas 07 Dec '17

07 Dec '17

Anyone from AWS can contact me off-list? We peer with AS16509 in Montreal and Toronto and get really good speed to US-EAST-1, US-EAST-2 and of course CA-CENTRAL-1 but anything else outside the east coast (US-WEST-1 and US-WEST-2 more precisely) is about ten times slower even on multi-threaded HTTP(S) or SCP/SFTP transfers. Goes through two of our transit providers, Telia and Zayo. Thanks Eric

2 2

Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider
by Michael S. Singh 07 Dec '17

07 Dec '17

Hi all, I am in need of some suggestions for some privacy conscious email providers. I am currently using Migadu email hosting from Switzerland, basically they allow their users to have as many domains and mailboxes without storage limits without extra cost. However they only allow 10 messages to be sent per day on their free tier. -- Sincerely Michael S Singh, M: 914-266-0601 W: www.wadadli.me F: 5E0E FD46 4592 1682 A4B6 5F62 761E 4940 A177 3B38 Sent via Migadu.com, world's easiest email hosting

35 83

Qrator Radar - Peerings
by Mike Hammett 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Does anyone use this site much? Has something happened to reduce their visibility? I've noticed multiple networks that had massive drops in peerings on or around March 11, 2017. AS5650 went from 66 to 12. AS53828 went from 436 to 19. PCH's AS3856 looking glass still reports adjacencies to both of those ASes. AS3856 went from 183 adjacencies to 113 that same day (and didn't bounce back). It seems rather unlikely that PCH would lose that much, given that their goal is to collect route table information. Even more odd that those two ASNs would also lose a ton of peers the same day. Thoughts? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP

5 5

Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider
by Brian Kantor 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0500, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:29:30PM -0500, Gordon Ewasiuk via NANOG wrote: > > and an online form where you can report EC2 abusers: > > https://aws.amazon.com/forms/report-abuse > > 1. Used it (and the abuse@ address). Either (a) no response and/or (b) > boilerplate response. No responses indicating that reports were read and > understood by a human. No responses indicating any action taken, whether > reactive or proactive. No apparent change in observed attacks/abuse. > > 2. Y'know, if I can see attacks/abuse arriving at networks/systems > that I run, then surely they can see it leaving networks/systems that > they run. The same data is available to them as is available to me, > and I have absolutely no trouble noticing it. Why don't they see it and > do something about it even before I (or anybody else) has the chance to > report it? Better yet, why not study the large-scale patterns over time > and proactively address it? (In fairness, the SMTP rate-limit described > inter alia is exactly the sort of thing that would be part of this, > and it's good that they're doing that.) > > ---rsk For the largest players, I can see no economic advantage in being a good network neighbor, and plenty of cost (salaries, equipment) to do so. Until that situation is reversed, even the most conscientious network engineer will have great difficulty to get management to go along with being a good guy. I liken it to dumping toxic waste. Clearly it was a better deal for a company to just dump its toxic waste instead of pay for proper dispoal, until large government fines forced a change in the practice. The solution is to somehow make bad behaviour expensive. - Brian

1 0

Sys admin has gotten of topic...
by Richard 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Please squash this thread as it has run it's course. Thank you, Richard

1 0

Verizon issues | Dec 6
by Van Dyk, Donovan 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Hello fellow netengs, Is anyone else experiencing issues with Verizon network in North America? We have seen multiple outages throughout the day for traffic destined for Verizon. Have been unable to confirm anywhere else so seeing if anyone else noticed. Times are Dec 06:23 Dec 09:39 – 09:45 UTC Dec 6 14:48 – 14:53 UTC Dec6 16:55 – 17:01 UTC Thanks -- Donovan Van Dyk SOC Network Engineer Office: +1.954.620.6002 x911 Fort Lauderdale, FL USA [cid:image001.png@01D36E8D.6A9FD4A0] The information contained in this electronic mail transmission and its attachments may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient (or an individual responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are strictly prohibited from copying, disseminating or distributing this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all electronic, paper or other versions.

2 2

One week remaining in the 2017 ARIN Customer Satisfaction Survey!
by John Curran 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

NANOGers - If you make use of the ARIN’s services, here is a great opportunity to provide ARIN feedback on what we’re getting right and how we can improve. The 2017 ARIN Customer Satisfaction Survey is available as detailed below, and will remain open for just another week! (There is also a prize drawing involved, for those who need just a little extra incentive..) Thanks in advance for your input! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN Begin forwarded message: From: ARIN <info(a)arin.net<mailto:info@arin.net>> Subject: [arin-announce] 2017 ARIN Customer Satisfaction Survey Now Open Date: 30 November 2017 at 12:08:42 PM EST To: <arin-announce(a)arin.net<mailto:arin-announce@arin.net>> From November 30 – December 14, ARIN is conducting a survey to determine the current level of customer satisfaction with ARIN services and to inform a path forward to make future improvements. This customer satisfaction study will enhance the feedback collection we already conduct throughout the year using transaction surveys, the feedback button on the front page of the ARIN website, the ARIN Consultation and Suggestion Process, and other feedback mechanisms. As with our previous customer satisfaction survey, we are working with a marketing research firm, Rockbridge Associates, to conduct this survey and gain a better understanding of our performance in all areas of the organization. The survey should only take about 15 minutes to complete and is available (via confirmit.com<http://confirmit.com>) at: http://survey.us.confirmit.com/wix/p3085177322.aspx We will randomly select winners to receive a $500 Amazon Gift Card during the survey period. If you would like to participate, please provide your name and an email address on the final page of the survey. This information will only be used for the purposes of randomly selecting and contacting survey prize winners. The names of the winners will be announced. If you do not wish to be included in the random drawing for a gift card, you can complete the survey without providing your name and email address. Your feedback is important to us, and we value your time to help improve ARIN services. The survey is currently open. Let us know how we’re doing. Thank you. Richard Jimmerson Chief Information Officer American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)

1 0

WiFi - login page redirection not working
by Ramy Hashish 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Good day all, A lot have been said on this topic, however I want to make sure I am not missing something. Two points with this problem: 1)Is there a "non client" solution to the problem of the WiFi login notification not showing up on the clients after connecting to the WiFi network? Second, anything to be done from the AP to show the landing page even if the page requested is HTTPs? Thanks, Ramy

8 12

Any Megapath / GTT clue?
by mike.lyon＠gmail.com 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Getting no where with the front end support @ Megapath. /28 suddenly is no longer being routed to my client. Any help would be appreciated. Thank You, Mike

2 1

Equinix SV8 Facebook IPv6 router 2001:504:D::47/64 constantly bouncing sessions
by Peter Kranz 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Are other SV8 peering exchange participants seeing problems with Facebooks 2001:504:D::47/64 router in the SV8? Been seeing this for over 48 hours now. No issues with other SV8 peers, or Facebooks other IPv6 router in the facility. Dec 5 18:52:00: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down BGP Notification sent Dec 5 18:53:40: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 18:55:07: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down NSF peer closed the session Dec 5 18:58:42: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:00:12: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down NSF peer closed the session Dec 5 19:09:41: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:11:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down NSF peer closed the session Dec 5 19:16:21: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:17:47: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down NSF peer closed the session Dec 5 19:18:54: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:20:24: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down BGP Notification sent Dec 5 19:40:58: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:43:14: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down BGP Notification sent Dec 5 19:47:03: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:48:51: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down BGP Notification sent Dec 5 19:50:54: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:52:21: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down NSF peer closed the session Dec 5 19:53:44: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:55:11: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down NSF peer closed the session Dec 5 19:55:57: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Up Dec 5 19:57:27: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2001:504:D::47 Down BGP Notification sent Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 pkranz(a)unwiredltd.com

1 0