- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Weekly Routing Table Report
by cscora＠apnic.net 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfsinoz(a)gmail.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 19 Jan, 2019 Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 734004 Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS): 282378 Deaggregation factor: 2.60 Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets): 353532 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 62962 Prefixes per ASN: 11.66 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 54273 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 23530 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 8689 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 265 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.2 Max AS path length visible: 31 Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 16327) 25 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 22 Number of instances of unregistered ASNs: 24 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 25491 Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 20715 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 89526 Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 16 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 1 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 273 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2841952643 Equivalent to 169 /8s, 100 /16s and 193 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 76.8 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 76.8 Percentage of available address space allocated: 100.0 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 99.1 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 245866 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 199790 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 57093 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 3.50 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 196929 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 81448 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 9384 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 20.99 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 2643 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1386 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.1 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 26 Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 4378 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 769374242 Equivalent to 45 /8s, 219 /16s and 184 /24s APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319, 58368-59391, 63488-64098, 64297-64395, 131072-139577 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 36/8, 39/8, 42/8, 43/8, 49/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 101/8, 103/8, 106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8, 163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 217361 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 103199 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.11 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 216564 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 103707 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18321 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 11.82 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 6799 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1847 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.8 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 23 Number of ARIN region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 2549 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 1079601824 Equivalent to 64 /8s, 89 /16s and 106 /24s ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959, 46080-47103 53248-55295, 62464-63487, 64198-64296, 393216-399260 ARIN Address Blocks 3/8, 4/8, 6/8, 7/8, 8/8, 9/8, 11/8, 12/8, 13/8, 15/8, 16/8, 17/8, 18/8, 19/8, 20/8, 21/8, 22/8, 23/8, 24/8, 26/8, 28/8, 29/8, 30/8, 32/8, 33/8, 34/8, 35/8, 38/8, 40/8, 44/8, 45/8, 47/8, 48/8, 50/8, 52/8, 53/8, 54/8, 55/8, 56/8, 57/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, 66/8, 67/8, 68/8, 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, 72/8, 73/8, 74/8, 75/8, 76/8, 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, 99/8, 100/8, 104/8, 107/8, 108/8, 128/8, 129/8, 130/8, 131/8, 132/8, 134/8, 135/8, 136/8, 137/8, 138/8, 139/8, 140/8, 142/8, 143/8, 144/8, 146/8, 147/8, 148/8, 149/8, 152/8, 155/8, 156/8, 157/8, 158/8, 159/8, 160/8, 161/8, 162/8, 164/8, 165/8, 166/8, 167/8, 168/8, 169/8, 170/8, 172/8, 173/8, 174/8, 184/8, 192/8, 198/8, 199/8, 204/8, 205/8, 206/8, 207/8, 208/8, 209/8, 214/8, 215/8, 216/8, RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 201336 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 95847 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 2.10 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 197689 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 116800 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 25749 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 7.68 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 11481 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3615 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 30 Number of RIPE region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 7738 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 716348864 Equivalent to 42 /8s, 178 /16s and 157 /24s RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055, 47104-52223, 56320-58367 59392-61439, 61952-62463, 64396-64495 196608-210331 RIPE Address Blocks 2/8, 5/8, 25/8, 31/8, 37/8, 46/8, 51/8, 62/8, 77/8, 78/8, 79/8, 80/8, 81/8, 82/8, 83/8, 84/8, 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8, 89/8, 90/8, 91/8, 92/8, 93/8, 94/8, 95/8, 109/8, 141/8, 145/8, 151/8, 176/8, 178/8, 185/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/8, 195/8, 212/8, 213/8, 217/8, LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 95296 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 22034 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.32 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 96718 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 42241 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 7994 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 12.10 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 2186 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1494 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.0 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 31 Number of LACNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 5547 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 173205248 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 82 /16s and 231 /24s LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, 52224-53247, 61440-61951, 64099-64197, 262144-270748 + ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 177/8, 179/8, 181/8, 186/8, 187/8, 189/8, 190/8, 191/8, 200/8, 201/8, AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 20198 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 4186 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.83 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 25831 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 9092 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1232 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 20.97 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 421 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 242 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 19 Number of AfriNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 503 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 103019520 Equivalent to 6 /8s, 35 /16s and 244 /24s AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887, 327680-328703 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 102/8, 105/8, 154/8, 196/8, 197/8, APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4538 4649 4192 74 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 7545 4610 524 522 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 7552 3043 1159 92 VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel Group, VN 45899 3000 1721 111 VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN 4766 2809 11127 767 KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom, KR 9829 2749 1496 551 BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone, IN 9808 2473 8699 26 CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication 9394 2401 4906 29 CTTNET China TieTong Telecommunications 4755 2143 438 181 TATACOMM-AS TATA Communications formerl 17974 2035 968 50 TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indo Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-APNIC ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6327 3536 1326 92 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 11492 3490 225 613 CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC., US 22773 3310 2979 174 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 16509 2606 5374 989 AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US 16625 2255 1238 1704 AKAMAI-AS - Akamai Technologies, Inc., 20115 2149 2753 537 CHARTER-20115 - Charter Communications, 18566 2136 405 108 MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath Corporation, US 30036 2118 355 111 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS - Mediacom 5650 2089 3074 1462 FRONTIER-FRTR - Frontier Communications 209 2071 5076 585 CENTURYLINK-US-LEGACY-QWEST - CenturyLi Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-ARIN RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 12479 5302 1628 138 UNI2-AS, ES 39891 3778 203 20 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 8551 3283 378 43 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Interne 20940 2640 573 1937 AKAMAI-ASN1, US 12389 2230 2220 631 ROSTELECOM-AS, RU 34984 2056 338 525 TELLCOM-AS, TR 9121 1690 1691 17 TTNET, TR 13188 1604 100 46 TRIOLAN, UA 8402 1301 545 15 CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom", RU 9009 1279 139 714 M247, GB Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-RIPE LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 5518 3326 588 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 10620 3143 473 915 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 11830 2675 371 59 Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad 6503 1620 449 54 Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V., MX 7303 1441 961 226 Telecom Argentina S.A., AR 28573 1178 2239 183 CLARO S.A., BR 6147 1088 377 29 Telefonica del Peru S.A.A., PE 3816 1029 511 115 COLOMBIA TELECOMUNICACIONES S.A. ESP, C 11172 935 143 66 Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V., MX 13999 928 535 253 Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V., MX Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-LACNIC AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 24863 1148 393 22 LINKdotNET-AS, EG 37611 903 107 9 Afrihost, ZA 36903 797 401 139 MT-MPLS, MA 36992 784 1411 44 ETISALAT-MISR, EG 24835 684 634 21 RAYA-AS, EG 8452 642 1731 20 TE-AS TE-AS, EG 29571 482 70 13 ORANGE-COTE-IVOIRE, CI 37492 459 470 57 ORANGE-, TN 15399 417 45 11 WANANCHI-, KE 37342 416 32 1 MOVITEL, MZ Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-AFRINIC Global Per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 5518 3326 588 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 12479 5302 1628 138 UNI2-AS, ES 4538 4649 4192 74 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 7545 4610 524 522 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 39891 3778 203 20 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 6327 3536 1326 92 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 11492 3490 225 613 CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC., US 22773 3310 2979 174 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 8551 3283 378 43 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Interne 10620 3143 473 915 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 12479 5302 5164 UNI2-AS, ES 4538 4649 4575 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Research Net 7545 4610 4088 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 39891 3778 3758 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 6327 3536 3444 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 8551 3283 3240 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Internet Backbo 22773 3310 3136 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communications 7552 3043 2951 VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel Group, VN 45899 3000 2889 VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN 11492 3490 2877 CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC., US Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-CIDRnet List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 230105 UNALLOCATED 38.110.79.0/24 23015 CMC180-TOR-AS - Cambridge Merc 266842 UNALLOCATED 45.238.156.0/22 265680 HNTELCO S.A, HN 174405 UNALLOCATED 103.217.158.0/24 135405 TMHTTWTL-AS-AP WELINK, MM 64339 UNALLOCATED 143.0.108.0/22 18747 IFX18747 - IFX Corporation, US 64355 UNALLOCATED 156.40.196.0/24 30387 NIH-NET-NCCS - National Instit 64011 UNALLOCATED 166.133.128.0/18 20057 ATT-MOBILITY-LLC-AS20057 - AT& 64011 UNALLOCATED 166.133.192.0/18 20057 ATT-MOBILITY-LLC-AS20057 - AT& 64011 UNALLOCATED 166.184.9.0/24 20057 ATT-MOBILITY-LLC-AS20057 - AT& 64011 UNALLOCATED 166.220.64.0/19 20057 ATT-MOBILITY-LLC-AS20057 - AT& 64011 UNALLOCATED 166.220.96.0/19 20057 ATT-MOBILITY-LLC-AS20057 - AT& Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-badAS Prefixes from private and non-routed address space (Global) ----------------------------------------------------------- Prefix Origin AS Description 198.18.1.19/32 7497 CSTNET-AS-AP Computer Network Information Cente Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-dsua Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 27.100.7.0/24 56096 UNKNOWN 27.126.156.0/22 55827 UNKNOWN 27.126.156.0/23 55827 UNKNOWN 27.126.158.0/23 55827 UNKNOWN 41.76.136.0/22 37500 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.76.140.0/22 37500 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 41.78.92.0/22 14988 BTC-GATE1, BW 41.78.180.0/23 37265 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 43.255.80.0/24 36351 SOFTLAYER - SoftLayer Technologies Inc., US 43.255.82.0/24 36351 SOFTLAYER - SoftLayer Technologies Inc., US Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-add-IANA Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:12 /9:10 /10:36 /11:99 /12:292 /13:568 /14:1129 /15:1917 /16:13358 /17:7881 /18:13838 /19:25541 /20:39660 /21:46167 /22:91397 /23:74725 /24:414525 /25:922 /26:827 /27:877 /28:20 /29:6 /30:7 /31:0 /32:190 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 12479 4153 5302 UNI2-AS, ES 6327 3299 3536 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 39891 2946 3778 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 11492 2763 3490 CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC., US 8551 2739 3283 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Internet Backbo 22773 2549 3310 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communications 18566 2031 2136 MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath Corporation, US 11830 2021 2675 Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad y Telec 30036 1864 2118 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS - Mediacom Communi 5650 1761 2089 FRONTIER-FRTR - Frontier Communications of Amer Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-sXXas-nos Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 1:1612 2:895 3:1 4:23 5:2779 6:43 7:1 8:1176 12:1874 13:307 14:1890 15:36 16:2 17:218 18:59 20:49 23:2590 24:2413 25:2 27:2553 31:2040 32:92 35:31 36:827 37:3012 38:1606 39:289 40:122 41:3130 42:729 43:2000 44:140 45:6508 46:3158 47:247 49:1329 50:1084 51:320 52:1075 54:360 55:1 56:6 57:41 58:1715 59:1058 60:460 61:2070 62:2202 63:1811 64:5095 65:2194 66:4820 67:2676 68:1153 69:3453 70:1151 71:604 72:2281 74:2752 75:416 76:542 77:1719 78:1757 79:2316 80:1651 81:1431 82:1068 83:899 84:1082 85:2137 86:559 87:1544 88:983 89:2398 90:211 91:6556 92:1228 93:2375 94:2428 95:3204 96:910 97:349 98:938 99:169 100:87 101:1159 102:355 103:19831 104:3559 105:245 106:875 107:1822 108:695 109:3646 110:1642 111:1866 112:1403 113:1404 114:1154 115:1724 116:1655 117:1917 118:2215 119:1674 120:1063 121:1026 122:2365 123:1638 124:1443 125:1947 128:1197 129:693 130:520 131:1636 132:707 133:216 134:1046 135:229 136:544 137:679 138:1968 139:812 140:570 141:774 142:799 143:1004 144:908 145:504 146:1244 147:776 148:1716 149:810 150:781 151:1002 152:975 153:324 154:2412 155:969 156:1637 157:874 158:659 159:1907 160:1497 161:908 162:2659 163:775 164:1119 165:1590 166:452 167:1368 168:3261 169:870 170:4010 171:501 172:1067 173:2155 174:1000 175:869 176:2290 177:4069 178:2564 179:1291 180:2084 181:2382 182:2675 183:1059 184:1136 185:14570 186:3699 187:2439 188:2956 189:2095 190:8297 191:1420 192:10041 193:6523 194:5321 195:4036 196:2900 197:1729 198:5724 199:5951 200:7409 201:5026 202:10119 203:10112 204:4622 205:3012 206:3295 207:3265 208:3956 209:4214 210:3923 211:1983 212:3041 213:2834 214:1068 215:52 216:5982 217:2198 218:920 219:572 220:1833 221:995 222:977 223:1428 End of report

1 0

RE: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform
by Luke Guillory 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Here is what you get. resultDate ipAddress country region city latitude longitude serverId serverName userAgent connectionType ispName ispNameRaw download (Kbps) upload (Kbps) ping (ms) jitter testId From: Mike Hammett [mailto:nanog@ics-il.net] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 11:25 AM To: Luke Guillory Cc: NANOG; Aaron Gould; Colton Conor Subject: Re: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform I haven't seen the level of reporting on the paid service because I don't have it, but I get reporting on a free, public server. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ________________________________ From: "Luke Guillory" <lguillory(a)reservetele.com<mailto:lguillory@reservetele.com>> To: "Aaron Gould" <aaron1(a)gvtc.com<mailto:aaron1@gvtc.com>>, "Colton Conor" <colton.conor(a)gmail.com<mailto:colton.conor@gmail.com>> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog(a)nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 11:22:21 AM Subject: RE: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform The paid version gives you access to all the reporting from the test ran against your server. Luke Ns From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 11:18 AM To: 'Colton Conor' Cc: 'NANOG' Subject: RE: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform I think the motivation for the paid/onsite version of ookla was so that we could say how good our customers speed is, without going through the internet. We can’t control utilization on the Internet, but we can internally. -Aaron From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.conor@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 8:37 AM To: Aaron Gould Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform Aaron, How does the https://account.speedtestcustom.com/login differ from hosting a speedtest.net<http://speedtest.net> server as an ISP, and letting anyone test through it? Seems the speedtest custom is a paid option, but hosting a speedtest.net<http://speedtest.net> server is free if you allow it to the public domain. Sure it uses up bandwidth (which I am sure you have a ton of), so I don't see the point of having a custom one? On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:27 AM Aaron Gould <aaron1(a)gvtc.com<mailto:aaron1@gvtc.com>> wrote: https://github.com/adolfintel/speedtest - one drawback we’ve seen is upload test has issues on some iphones (maybe other mobile devices) in safari, but I think chrome might work, unsure https://account.speedtestcustom.com/login - ookla customer speedtest – we have this running *internally* in our network on VM and also bare-metal, this is where our customers test locally Iperf - us engineers used it wifiperf – us engineers used it -Aaron

1 0

RE: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits?
by Tony Patti 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Hi Victor, I was curious about this, so I did a Google search, and found this AT&T RFO PDF: http://attnocpr.com/custportal/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ATT-PR-NOC-RFO.pdf While it does not specifically talk to your cost question, it does define a simple procedure to request RFO via email, and one would presume there is no cost, since none specified. Tony Patti [SW_logo_HighRes]<http://www.swalter.com/> CIO t: (215) 867-8401 f: (215) 268-7184 e: tony(a)swalter.com<mailto:tony@swalter.com> w: www.swalter.com<http://www.swalter.com/> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces(a)nanog.org<mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org>> On Behalf Of Victor Breen Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 2:35 PM To: nanog(a)nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Hey All, I just caught wind from multiple support reps of ours that AT&T is now demanding payment to get an RFO. As in, our folks are calling up AT&T to see why a particular tail circuit was down for whatever period of time and has since come back up with no clear utility power issue or backhoe fade to explain it. The response they get is that an RFO is billable and they have been asked to accept the charge to proceed (which they have rightly rejected thus far). This is the first time I've heard of this happening with any of our last-mile transport providers. I'm very curious, has anyone else experienced this lately with AT&T or any other carriers? -- Victor Breen | victor(a)impulse.net<mailto:victor@impulse.net> Sr. Engineer | Impulse Advanced Communications www.impulse.net<http://www.impulse.net>

1 0

contact from AS3
by Ricardo Patara 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Hello, I need to contact someone form AS3. If in the list, could you please contact me privately. It seems this ASN is announcing IP blocks from other organization. Thanks Ricardo Patara

2 2

AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits?
by Victor Breen 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Hey All, I just caught wind from multiple support reps of ours that AT&T is now demanding payment to get an RFO. As in, our folks are calling up AT&T to see why a particular tail circuit was down for whatever period of time and has since come back up with no clear utility power issue or backhoe fade to explain it. The response they get is that an RFO is billable and they have been asked to accept the charge to proceed (which they have rightly rejected thus far). This is the first time I've heard of this happening with any of our last-mile transport providers. I'm very curious, has anyone else experienced this lately with AT&T or any other carriers? -- Victor Breen | victor(a)impulse.net Sr. Engineer | Impulse Advanced Communications www.impulse.net

3 3

colocation in Kansas City
by Tom Ammon 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Does anybody here do business with Tierpoint in Kansas City? Do you recommend them? Tom -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Ammon M: (801) 784-2628 thomasammon(a)gmail.com -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

Anyone using AT&T's ECOMP/ONAP?
by adamv0025＠netconsultings.com 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

Hi gents, I'm looking for physical network services orchestration framework for network service providers that could later be used/extended to orchestrate other areas of the business (virtualized services in DC, etc..). So far it appears to me that there's no such ready-made commercial product on the market that would contain all the building blocks I'd be interested in (well especially the easy to use service designer tool). ECOMP and now OANP seem to have it all and much more I'm just curious if anyone is using it in anger (or parts of it for that matter) for orchestration/design/automation of services on physical network. I'd like to hear some stories from trenches with regards to the implementation, but I'd be also interested in your thoughts in case you just assessed the tool for implementation (why did liked not liked about it). Thank you adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry::

4 4

RE: Your opinion on network analysis in the presence of uncertain events
by adamv0025＠netconsultings.com 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

> From: Mel Beckman <mel(a)beckman.org> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 9:21 PM > > MTBF can’t be used alone to predict failure probability, because product > mortality follows the infamous “bathtub curve”. Products are as likely to fail > early in their lives as later in their lives. MTBF as a scalar value is just an > average. > Yes very good point -however that's where the historical data should come to rescue to help bend the MTBF line into this expected "bathtub curve". adam

1 0

Re: ASNs decimation in ZW this morning
by Colin Johnston 18 Jan '19

18 Jan '19

> On 15 Jan 2019, at 17:03, C. A. Fillekes <cfillekes(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Whole countries falling off the net? BUT TEH TOP POSTINGS!!! > > I'm a little frustrated with the very existence of that thread. > > Trying to constructively change the topic to something more interesting lol. > > I guess the concerning thing to me is that the whole point of packet switched networks was to provide resilience in the face of e.g. civil disorder. > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:50 AM Colin Johnston <colinj(a)gt86car.org.uk <mailto:colinj@gt86car.org.uk>> wrote: > sorry top posting, > yup whatsup doesnt work in harare. > phone circuits land ok though and checked ok > > col > > Sent from my iPod > > On 15 Jan 2019, at 15:42, C. A. Fillekes <cfillekes(a)gmail.com <mailto:cfillekes@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:34 AM C. A. Fillekes <cfillekes(a)gmail.com <mailto:cfillekes@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> So @meileaben on twitter this morning notes: >> >> Many #Zimbabwe <https://twitter.com/hashtag/Zimbabwe?src=hash> Internet routes withdrawn around 9:30 UTC amidst civil unrest in the country. near-realtime on #RIPEstat <https://twitter.com/hashtag/RIPEstat?src=hash> here: https://stat.ripe.net/ZW <https://t.co/sgJ4O3310z> #OpenNetworkIntelligence <https://twitter.com/hashtag/OpenNetworkIntelligence?src=hash> #ZimbabweShutdown <https://twitter.com/hashtag/ZimbabweShutdown?src=hash> >> >> https://twitter.com/meileaben/status/1085118237157851136 <https://twitter.com/meileaben/status/1085118237157851136> >> >> wondering if anyone here has additional info on that. Looing at stat.ripe.net/ZW <http://stat.ripe.net/ZW> now it looks as though one (out of an original 18, current 9) ASN has recovered, but kind of curious as to what exactly happened there. >> >> So Bloomberg notes that a number of ISPs were shut down to quell online protest >> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-15/by-killing-the-internet-… <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-15/by-killing-the-internet-…> but are there no work-arounds available, if implemented? zimbabwe situation link below re telecom problems https://www.zimbabwesituation.com/news/zimbabwe-telecoms-jammed-after-viole… <https://www.zimbabwesituation.com/news/zimbabwe-telecoms-jammed-after-viole…> I was back in Zim myself last month as well to see family children, internet was working well then inc whats up, mobile and adsl. I wonder how they block social media sites/whats up, is it null routing on peering cores or filtering since did not see filtering in place from ZIM<>UK last month... Colin

4 8

No IPv6 by design to increase reliability...
by John Von Essen 17 Jan '19

17 Jan '19

I was having a debate with someone on this. Take a critical web site, say one where you want 100% global uptime, no potential issues with end users having connectivity or routing issues getting to your IP. Would it be advantageous to purposely not support a AAAA record in DNS and disable IPv6, only exist on IPv4? My argument against this was "Broken IPv6 Connectivity" doesn't really occur anymore, also, almost all browsers and OS IP stacks implement Happy Eyeballs algorithm where both v4 and v6 are attempted, so if v6 dies it will try v4. I would also argue that lack of IPv6 technically makes the site unreachable from native IPv6 clients, and in the event of an IPv4 outage, connectivity might still remain on IPv6 if the site had an IPv6 address (I've experienced scenarios with a bad IPv4 BGP session, but the IPv6 session remained up and transiting traffic...) Thoughts? -John

6 6