- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

BGP topological vs centralized route reflector
by Mohammad Khalil 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

Dears Am trying to find some documents and practical implementations regarding bgp topological vs centralized route reflector(In-band vs out-of-band) Any good shares are appreciated

8 16

Cisco ASR's with RSP440 engines...
by John Von Essen 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

If anyone on here has experience with the ASR series running the RSP440-SE or -TR, please contact me off-list. I'm trying to better understand real world performance when it comes to handling a few full BGP tables on these, it would be running as very basic edge router primarily just doing BGP. I know the RSP440 is EOL, but the plan would be to upgrade to RSP880 within a year. Thanks John

3 3

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
by Scott Weeks 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

--- beecher(a)beecher.cc wrote: From: Tom Beecher <beecher(a)beecher.cc> Every single person on this list has either sent an email they later regret[...] ------------------------------------------ Not me. No way. Never. ;) scott

3 2

Microsoft Peering IPv4 BGP Table
by Craig 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

If someone could please send me a IPv4 BGP table for the Microsoft Express Routes Microsoft Peer for the prefixes you are receiving, I would appreciate it. thanks; CPV

1 0

Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform
by Colton Conor 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

As an internet service provider with many small business and residential customers, our most common tech support calls are speed related. Customers complaining on slow speeds, slowdowns, etc. We have a SNMP and ping monitoring platform today, but that mainly tells us up-time and if data is flowing across the interface. We can of course see the link speed, but customer call in saying the are not getting that speed. We are looking for a way to remotely test customers internet connections besides telling the customer to go to speedtest.net, or worse sending a tech out with a laptop to do the same thing. What opensource and commercial options are out there?

26 39

Craigslist technical contact - IP Ranges blocked
by Erik Zhu 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hello All, Does anyone know the best way to get connect to Craiglist technical support regarding the blocked IP ranges. We are an ISP in Canada, and since early this year we noticed that most of our IP blocks are blocked on some of the Craigslist's servers. One easy example is finding any items on Craigslist, hit reply, and gives an error "Sorry, something went wrong", the web analyzer indicates status code 403 forbidden. I understand that if individual subscriber IP could be automatically blocked due to certain reasons by Craigslist, but I don't know why our entire IP blocks could be blocked, even some IP ranges are never assigned to any active services. Did anyone have the encountered the same issue before, how can we get it resolved? Thanks, Erik

2 1

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
by hank＠interall.co.il 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

On 18/02/2019 04:03, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote: If that is the case you should have a startup worth at least $10M with numerous VC banging down your door. If not, you need to ask yourself the question "why not?". -Hank > Hello Everyone, > > My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the guy who proposed SMTP > over TLS on Port 26 last month. I'm also the guy who attacked (???) > John Levine. > > Today I have something to show you. Long story short.... I solved > the email spam problem. Well... Actually I solved it long time back. > I'm just ready to disclose it today. Again... > > @Everyone > > Here is what you all should know. > > It's my 5 years of research. So it's worth more than 50 words. I > started my work back in 2013 and I used to call my work "XMail" at > that time. It's now called "Dombox" > > My prototype codebase has around 200,000 lines of code. [To be > exact: 466,965 ++ 254,169 --] > > Sequoia Capital is one of the well known venture firm in the world. > They have invested in over 250 companies since 1972, including > Apple, Google, Oracle, PayPal, Stripe, YouTube, Instagram, Yahoo! > and WhatsApp. Bill Coughran is a senior investor in Sequoia Capital. > According to his linkedin profile, he started as a Programmer in the > late 60s and held many engineering related positions over the years. > Worked in Bell Laboratories for 20 years. Worked as SVP of > Engineering in Google for 8.5 years. To quote his words "I have some > level of expertise about the current email systems, which is why I > was did some investigating". So this man is one of the toughest > person to impress. But he is one of the nicest investor I have met. > When I asked him whether he can take a look, he didn't insult me > with words like "You think you are the inventor of FUSSP?" He just > told me "Sure, I'd be happy to." He went through my entire paper and > then sent me this mail. He later turned me down because it's hard > for a startup to distribute a new solution. Maybe he is right. Or > maybe I'll overcome that too. [Today's discussion is about whether I > solved the spam problem. Not about how I'm gonna distribute the > solution] > > Yesterday I published my work on a medium blog post and linked my > white paper. An engineer read my white paper and sent me this mail. > These guys see value in my white paper because they completed my > ~300 pages white paper. ---------------------------------- > > Materials: > > System Overview - > https://medium.com/@Viruthagiri/dombox-the-zero-spam-mail-system-2b08ff7432… > > White Paper - https://www.dombox.org/dombox.pdf > > Flowcharts - https://www.dombox.org/flowcharts.pdf > > Prototype - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VK2eSfCurx4 [This is the > video I uploaded before posting to DMARC list. So the interface is > little outdated] > > -- > Best Regards, > > Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan > Dombox, Inc.

1 0

TATA/AS6453 BGP communities
by Tim Warnock 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hey, Anyone have a list of BGP communities for TATA/AS6453? Mainly chasing geo tags. Their peeringdb contacts are non-responsive. Thanks Tim.

2 2

Amazon contact off-list
by Ben Cannon 17 Feb '19

17 Feb '19

Can someone from Amazon (preferably SF Bay area) contact me off-list please? -Ben. -Ben Cannon CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC ben(a)6by7.net <mailto:ben@6by7.net>

1 0

OT/venting: RIPE legal - please stop this madness!
by Markus 16 Feb '19

16 Feb '19

Hi list! The following is off-topic/venting. It's about RIPE and my company in Germany. If you don't care about this even remotely, don't read on and don't flame me. I'm just so pissed and I have no other connection to the ISP (and related) community than the NANOG mailing list and I know there are some other European ISPs on this list. Here goes: My company has been a RIPE LIR for 17 years now. This week was the first time ever that I became, was and still am really, really pissed at RIPE. There's some madness going on in RIPEs legal department. It appears they recently hired some retard who now wants to prove he/she is a smartass. Harsh words, but I have no other explanation for what's going on right now! Here's the story: Sunday, 10th February, 17:08 CET: I sent away the online application for an additional LIR account. Automatic E-Mail confirmation received. Monday, 11th February, 15:07 CET: I didn't receive a human reply yet, and since the business day was nearing its end, I mailed them about the status, and asked whether I could come by their Amsterdam office the next day to sign the required documents - in order to speed up the whole process. Monday, 11th February, 15:57 CET: Reply from RIPE. Let me just copy and paste: "I regret to inform you that we do not offer the possibility to sign your contracts in our office and regrettably there is no option to speed up the application procedure." - Ok, no biggie. But then: Quote start. "We can see that this is an additional LIR account for Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG. We are currently reviewing applications with a legal entity type 'GmbH & Co. KG' together with our legal department and they have stated the following: "GmbH & Co. KG" is a sub-form of a "KG" (partnership). It normally consists of a general partner and one or more limited partners, which can be legal or natural persons. According to "Due Diligence for the Quality of the RIPE NCC Registration Data" the signing party of an agreement can either be a legal or a natural person. A "KG" is not considered a legal person and cant be the signing party in our agreements. The agreement can be signed though by one of the legal or natural persons that are partners (general or limited). We therefore cannot register Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG. As you already have an LIR account with us, we will have to update your existing account, de.lightupnet, before we can register this second account for Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG. I created a new ticket for your company update and my colleagues will contact you shortly for the update." Quote end. That didn't sound so good. I've had a company with the legal form GmbH & Co. KG (it's a German company) for about 15 years now and my initial gut feeling was "That's just plain bullsh*t!". Tuesday, 12th February, 12:30: I receive another E-Mail. New ticket, as they promised. Quote start. "It has come to our attention, that the legal name of your LIR account has been registered incorrectly. It was advised by our Legal Department that the legal form of your company as "GmbH & Co. KG" is a form of a general partnership that does not have a legal personality. If there is a document proving opposite, please send it to us. According to our procedure, we can only sign an agreement with a legal person that has a legal personality or a natural person. Therefore, we will have to correct your legal name to <Markus Stalder trading as "Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG">, instead of <Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG>." Quote end. They also asked that I upload a photo/scan of my passport, which I did. I just thought: Ok, let them have their way. If they want to change my LIRs description, who really cares. All I want is to create a 2nd LIR and speed this whole thing up. But, since they want to be SO LEGALLY CORRECT, I replied and mentioned the following. Let me copy and paste. Quote start. "I just uploaded my passport. However, following your logic, you need to change all of the following German legal forms in your database to "Individual-name trading as ...": - OHG - KG - GmbH & Co. OHG - GmbH & Co. KG I understand that you would have to do that with a GbR, as a GbR cannot get registered in the commercial register of companies and you need to specify the names of the individuals. But I think with the above 4 legal forms you are making as mistake here. Although it is correct that a GmbH & Co. KG does not have a legal personality that differs from its general partners (Persoenlich haftende Gesellschafterin) or limited partners (Kommanditist), a GmbH & Co. KG is still a legal entity as its able to sue in front of court, or get sued in front of court. A GmbH & Co. KG can also purchase rights and enter into liabilities, can purchase property and other in rem rights related to estates. (Source: <https://www.frankfurt-main.ihk.de/existenzgruendung/rechtsfragen/idem/kg/>) That being said, since Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG was founded, I have never ever signed a contract where the contractual partner was "Markus Stalder trading as Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG" but the contractual partner was always Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG. That includes application forms towards government entities as well as contracts with larger corporations. Actually, my gut feeling based on my own experience with my GmbH & Co. KG in the last decades tells me that you are making a mistake here. And, if you want to be really accurate: You must be aware that the Kommanditist (limited partner) is not allowed to represent the company. That is something only the Komplementaerin (general partner) can do. The general partner of Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG is AirAccess GmbH. I'm attaching both company extracts for your convenience. So, correct would be: AirAccess GmbH trading as Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG" Quote end. Wednesday, 13th February, 18:02: Reply from RIPE: Quote start: "Many thanks for the clarification and the provided documents. Please be informed that our Due Diligence for the Quality of the RIPE NCC Registration Data <https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-700> has been implemented in 2018. As the application process for our members was not so strict before, it was possible to register an LIR account under the partnership name. Currently, we are working on correcting these details in the Database. At this moment we are reviewing German applications with a legal entity type 'GmbH & Co. KG' together with our legal department. Thus the information you provided is very helpful. On the review the documents you submitted, we indeed can see that "AirAccess GmbH" is a general partner with a special right to represent the company. The names of both LIR accounts (de.lightupnet, de.lightupnet1) will be corrected tomorrow. It will be confirmed to you once the account are updated." Quote end. ... another day passes ... Thursday, 14th February, 16:11: Now for the E-Mail from RIPE that blew my mind, in a negative sense. Quote start: "Many thanks for your patience. We have reviewed your case internally and agreed that there is no need to sign a new agreement for LIR account <de.lightupnet>, as it was signed by the director of the company. It has also come to our attention that, the company AirAccess GmbH (reg. No HRB 56386) already has LIR account <de.airaccess>. Therefore LIR <de.airaccess> should be linked as an additional account to <de.lightupnet>, and <de.lightupnet1>. Please be informed that the following will be applied to all additional LIR accounts: - The /22 IPv4 allocation you will receive is subject to the RIPE NCC Transfer Policy and can therefore only be transferred 24 months after the allocation date. - Members with multiple LIR accounts are entitled to just one vote at RIPE NCC General Meetings. The oldest LIR account will receive the vote. - If you wish to transfer internet resources between your LIR accounts, you need to pay the full annual service fee for all LIR accounts. - If you wish to close LIR account, you need to pay the full annual service fee for all LIR accounts. At this moment could you please inform us what name you prefer for LIR accounts <de.lightupnet>, <de.lightupnet1>: "AirAccess GmbH" or "AirAccess GmbH trading us Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG"? Once it is clarified, we will proceed with updating the legal details of your accounts and process the application for <de.lightupnet1>." Quote end. Spontaneous thought: HOLY F*CK, ARE THEY SERIOUS ?! ?! ?! They want to change the name of my company - Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & Co. KG - to a completely different company: AirAccess GmbH !!! Totally unrelated to each other, different business, different everything. The only thing these two companies have in common is that they're both mine. RIPE MUST BE NUTS! Here my reply: Quote start. "Hi <name of RIPE NCC support person>, thanks for your mail. Ok, now you are really taking it over the top. 1) You want to link AirAccess GmbH as an additional account to de.lightupnet. And you want to do this for a company which is a legal entity by itself. I do not allow you to do this. AirAccess GmbH is a legal entity by itself and I do not want that you change anything about its current LIR status, name or anything else. 2) You are offering that I can choose the name for de.lightupnet and de.lightupnet1 to be "AirAccess GmbH", a company which is an entity by itself and is merely the Komplementaerin (general partner) for Lightup Network Solutions GmbH & GmbH Co. KG. I'm shocked by that idea. That is just completely wrong. Of course I do NOT want de.lightupnet and de.lightupnet1 to be named "AirAccess GmbH" because it would be an factual error. And I don't want RIPE to make wrong statements about our company/companies towards the public. It would be like offering to present nl.ripe as KPN. Or Nike as Adidas. As it appears right now your legal department is doing a mistake when it comes to understanding how GmbH + Co. KGs work. Could you also please let me know the E-Mail address or telephone number where I can file a complaint about this whole procedure? Thank you." Quote end. This is where it stands right now. It's Friday, 15th February. The work week is over. I'm sitting here, waiting for RIPE since Monday to send me the LIR agreement for the 2nd LIR, so that I can sign it, pay it, and be done with it. My rhetorical questions are: 1) Are they fucking serious ... I can't remember the last time I was this angry at anyone. 2) It's RIPE. A large, established organisation that's been around forever. WHY THE F*CK does it take them always 1 day to process something, to reply to something? They have TONS of employees, they have TONS of LIRs that pay them TONS of money, why is everything moving so slowly with them ?! ?! ?! It's 2019, not 1995 FOR F*CKS SAKE !!! Get your act together and adapt to the times, modernize yourself and BE FASTER. UARRRGHHHL. 3) Why in heavens name do they EXACTLY have to start with this whole f*cked-up process when I ACTUALLY need something from them (a 2nd LIR account)? Why in this very moment? Yeah, because my company popped up on their screen because I applied for a 2nd LIR account, makes sense. But, could they not simply process the damn LIR application at the same time to speed this whole thing up, and later change this sh*t. No, of course, it would be not efficient for them to do that, but it's NOT MY FAULT they didn't ask to update this data/fix this company sh*t earlier. But now THEY MAKE IT MY PROBLEM. Because I'm losing precious time. F*CK! 4) If you look at the LIR list for Germany here - <https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/DE.html> - and search for "GmbH & Co. KG" in the document, you will see many companies that are still "unchanged": Company name GmbH & Co. KG, but you will also see some that were already "updated" according to RIPE logic: "Firstname Lastname trading as "Company GmbH & Co. KG" - the "funny" thing is that this is just wrong as I explained earlier. They have to re-do all these changes. By looking at this list it appears I'm the first where they offer to change it to "Another-company-name GmbH trading as Company GmbH & Co. KG" JUST BECAUSE I told them that with GmbH & Co. KGs the Kommanditist (legal partner) is not allowed to represent the company. So, being the first, and looking at that list for comparison tells me they have no idea what they are doing! Have a good day everyone and down with unnecessary, over-the-top bureaucracy! It's 2019 FOR F*CKS SAKE!!! Regards Markus

6 6