- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

RE: OT: XO Salestrolls
by Jim Deleskie 22 Apr '03

22 Apr '03

I'm feeling left out now :) -----Original Message----- From: Dominic J. Eidson [mailto:sauron@the-infinite.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 3:52 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: OT: XO Salestrolls On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 bdragon(a)gweep.net wrote: > I'm now (at least) the second person to be spammed by Scott Davis > with XO, who is mining the nanog list looking for marks. Make that 3. -- Dominic J. Eidson "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/

3 2

OT: XO Salestrolls
by bdragon＠gweep.net 22 Apr '03

22 Apr '03

I'm now (at least) the second person to be spammed by Scott Davis with XO, who is mining the nanog list looking for marks. I'ld recommend that those of you who do business with XO ask to not having anything to do with Scott Davis. Hopefully losing a few accounts will reeducate him into more ethical business practices.

5 4

RE: OT: XO Salestrolls
by Temkin, David 22 Apr '03

22 Apr '03

Four. -----Original Message----- From: Dominic J. Eidson [mailto:sauron@the-infinite.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 3:52 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: OT: XO Salestrolls On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 bdragon(a)gweep.net wrote: > I'm now (at least) the second person to be spammed by Scott Davis with > XO, who is mining the nanog list looking for marks. Make that 3. -- Dominic J. Eidson "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/ IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.

1 0

60 Hudson
by Simon Lockhart 22 Apr '03

22 Apr '03

Does anyone on-list know lots about 60 Hudson? I currently have my NY dark fiber ring going through the building (via the Level3 facility on the 18th floor), and now need to light the building. I will need to link up with the TelX suite on the 9th floor. Speaking to Level3, they're saying that the Fibernet suite on the 1st floor is the best place for interconnects to other suites in the building. Can anyone confirm this? Presumably Fibernet would be the best place for 1 cabinet of colo, given this information - anyone have a good sales contact with them? Thanks in advance, Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1628 407720 (BBC ext 37720) Technology Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1628 407701 (BBC ext 37701) BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart(a)bbc.co.uk BBC Technology, Maiden House, Vanwall Road, Maidenhead. SL6 4UB. UK

5 4

RE: Fiber cut?
by McBurnett, Jim 22 Apr '03

22 Apr '03

A small ISP at one of our small cities is claiming a fiber cut took them offline.. I can't buy it that it goes from ATlanta to San Fran in 1 hop.... Trace to www.advi.net 10 12.122.12.50 0ms 10ms 10ms TTL: 0 (ggr1-p380.attga.ip.att.net probable bogus rDNS: No DNS) 11 192.205.32.126 10ms 10ms 0ms TTL: 0 (att-gw.sf.uu.net probable bogus rDNS: 12 Request timed out We are moving a mail server and got caught... >-----Original Message----- >From: Mike (meuon) Harrison [mailto:meuon@highertech.net] >Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 5:46 PM >To: McBurnett, Jim >Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu >Subject: Re: Fiber cut? > > >On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, McBurnett, Jim wrote: > >> >> Does anyone know about a supposed fiber cut on the AT&T side >to UU.net in Hotlanta?? > >We route out of Atlanta on UU.net.. looks good here: > >HOST LOSS RCVD SENT >BEST AVG >shredder-1a.higherbandwidth.net 0% 10 10 >0.17 0.23 >ru-1.higherbandwidth.net 0% 10 10 >0.51 0.57 >500.Serial3-11.GW7.ATL1.ALTER.NET 0% 10 10 >2.77 3.34 >174.at-1-0-0.XL3.ATL1.ALTER.NET 0% 10 10 >3.05 3.77 >0.so-7-0-0.XL1.ATL5.ALTER.NET 0% 10 10 >3.52 6.02 >POS6-0.BR2.ATL5.ALTER.NET 0% 10 10 >3.37 4.83 >204.255.174.150 0% 10 10 >4.22 4.97 >gbr4-p50.attga.ip.att.net 0% 10 10 >4.26 5.38 >gbr4-p30.wswdc.ip.att.net 0% 10 10 >18.59 20.46 >gbr3-p60.wswdc.ip.att.net 0% 10 10 >17.83 19.09 >gbr3-p80.sl9mo.ip.att.net 0% 10 10 >29.09 30.14 >gbr1-p10.bgtmo.ip.att.net 0% 10 10 >29.56 31.59 >12.122.248.254 0% 10 10 >30.02 32.23 >192.168.254.42 0% 10 10 >30.30 31.12 >204.127.166.135 0% 10 10 >30.11 32.80 > > > >

4 3

RE: IPv6 Space at Public Exchanges
by Lane Patterson 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Correct, a quick glance reveals that Equinix, Telehouse America, and WorldCom MAE Services have all received ARIN IPv6 Exchange Point Microallocations out of non-6bone 2001: space--especially important now that it appears folks are renumbering out of 3ffe: and the 6bone-phaseout draft is on the table. I'm not sure why MAE's decided to go for a /48 for each location, but at Equinix we've just been carving out a /64 for each Exchange from the /48 block, as is the common practice at most exchanges. If Your Friendly Local Exchange doesn't support address space for IPv6 peering, just ask and I'm sure they would be happy to look into it. ARIN, RIPE, and APNIC policies are pretty much in sync on this topic, and designed to encourage adoption. Cheers, -Lane Lane Patterson <lane(a)equinix.com> Sr. R&D Engineer Equinix, Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Jimmerson [mailto:richardj@arin.net] > Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2003 8:42 AM > To: 'Nanog' > Subject: RE: IPv6 Space at Public Exchanges > > > > Hello Michael, > > There is a policy in the ARIN region that allows IPv6 and IPv4 > "micro-allocations" to exchange points. The policy is stated at: > > http://www.arin.net/policy/2001_3.html > > The list of IPv6 micro-allocations ARIN has made to date is > available at the following URL. These allocations are also > documented in ARIN WHOIS. > > http://www.arin.net/registration/ipv6/micro_alloc.html > > Best Regards, > > Richard Jimmerson > Director of Operations > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On > > Behalf Of Michael K. Smith > > Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2003 12:44 AM > > To: Nanog > > Subject: IPv6 Space at Public Exchanges > > > > > > > > Hello: > > > > Does anyone know if there are plans for IPv6 address space to > > be made available at the various public exchanges for the > > purpose of IPv6 peering between existing IPv4 peers? > > > > Mike > > > > -- > > > > Michael K. Smith NoaNet > > 206.219.7116 (work) 206.579.8360 (cell) > > mksmith(a)noanet.net http://www.noanet.net > > >

1 0

yclone.pbi.com contact
by Scott Granados 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Does anyone have a cyclone.pbi.com contact for nntp at pacbell. I tried the obvious including news@ newsadmin@ and the references on the usenet-se page but all bounced. Any pointers would be great. Thanks Scott

1 0

Fiber cut?
by McBurnett, Jim 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Does anyone know about a supposed fiber cut on the AT&T side to UU.net in Hotlanta?? Thanks, Jim

2 1

Re: Zebra Router???
by Crist J. Clark 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

"Joe" <joej(a)rocknyou.com> wrote: > I'll also point out that CheckPoint used a FreeBSD kernel for some > time. I believe they are now using a Linux variant, but don't quote > me on that. I believe you are refering to the platform Nokia resells Check Point on. It is FreeBSD-based. As for Linux, Check Point does support Red Hat, and there is something called "SecurePlatform" which is their own Linux distribution. Of course, Check Point also supports Windows NT (4.0 and 2k) and Solaris. -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark(a)alum.mit.edu | cjclark(a)jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc(a)freebsd.org

1 0

RE: BGP Issue...
by Todd A. Blank 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Thanks to all who responded off-list to this question. I received many interesting approaches (so many it was hard to keep up with them all) and really appreciate the support. Thanks again, Todd A. Blank IPOutlet LLC -----Original Message----- From: Todd A. Blank Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 4:48 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: BGP Issue... I have an operational question regarding BGP configuration - fairly advanced. I do not want to clutter the list. Can anyone who might be willing to discuss and/or help please email me off list? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Todd A. Blank IPOutlet LLC 614.207.5853

1 0