- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Light Reading: PIX Source Code For Sale
by frank＠dticonsulting.com 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

Black Market Offers Cisco's PIX [Firewall Source Code] NOVEMBER 05, 2004 Source code for Cisco Systems Inc.'s (Nasdaq: CSCO - message board) PIX firewall is up for sale. Too bad it's not Cisco doing the selling. An underground group known as the Source Code Collective is offering PIX version 6.3.1 for $24,000, according to a newsletter posted by the group to Usenet on Halloween. Little is known about SCC. The group debuted in July with an offer to sell source code from Enterasys Networks Inc.'s (NYSE: ETS - message board) Dragon Intrusion Defense System for $16,000 as well as Napster server and client source code for $10,000. Those prices have since gone up to $19,200 and $12,000, according to the recent newsletter. Those aren't the only companies in SCC's sights. The newsletter claims the group has virtual reams of source code to sell, but a full list is only available to previous buyers. "If you are requesting something from a Fortune 100 company, there is a good chance that we might already have it," the newsletter says. SCC even takes requests, supposedly assigning a team of hackers to retrieve source code for a price. The newsletters are posted by someone calling himself "Larry Hobbles" with an email address registered to a South African domain. SCC originally did its selling through a Web site registered to a Ukrainian domain -- they're a very cosmopolitan crew -- but had to drop that business model, citing concerns from customers. SCC now communicates with customers through email and Usenet only. To allay concerns of authenticity, SCC is willing to sell its code in chunks, allowing the customer to verify that the product appears genuine before purchasing the whole thing. The PIX sale is Cisco's second significant source-code scandal this year. In May, hackers claimed to have stolen the code for one version of the company's Internetwork Operating System (IOS) and posted part of the bounty on a Russian Web site. A British man was arrested in September, but few other details of the investigation have emerged. (See Cisco's IOS Code 'Compromised' and Cisco Code Hacker Arrested .) Craig Matsumoto, Senior Editor, Light Reading http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=lightreading&doc_id=62317 --------------------------------------------------------------- frank(a)fttx.org

1 0

The Cidr Report
by cidr-report＠potaroo.net 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

This report has been generated at Fri Nov 5 21:44:44 2004 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 29-10-04 147101 101511 30-10-04 147048 101490 30-10-04 147130 101422 01-11-04 147021 101589 02-11-04 147128 101682 03-11-04 147367 101936 04-11-04 147458 103774 05-11-04 156315 103781 AS Summary 18307 Number of ASes in routing system 7463 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix 6090 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS AS701 : UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. 81872128 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s) AS721 : DNIC DoD Network Information Center Aggregation Summary The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes'). --- 05Nov04 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description Table 156209 103789 52420 33.6% All ASes AS701 6090 892 5198 85.4% UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS705 2258 1009 1249 55.3% UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS18566 751 7 744 99.1% CVAD Covad Communications AS4134 825 178 647 78.4% CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street AS4323 794 224 570 71.8% TWTC Time Warner Telecom AS7018 1411 994 417 29.6% ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services AS7843 496 93 403 81.2% ADELPH-13 Adelphia Corp. AS6197 807 423 384 47.6% BNS-14 BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS22773 400 17 383 95.8% CXA Cox Communications Inc. AS27364 414 35 379 91.5% ARMC Armstrong Cable Services AS22909 409 66 343 83.9% CMCS Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. AS15557 371 43 328 88.4% LDCOMNET LDCOM NETWORKS AS6478 426 103 323 75.8% ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services AS1239 932 622 310 33.3% SPRN Sprint AS17676 367 63 304 82.8% JPNIC-JP-ASN-BLOCK Japan Network Information Center AS9929 335 33 302 90.1% CNCNET-CN China Netcom Corp. AS4355 384 99 285 74.2% ERSD EARTHLINK, INC AS4766 529 267 262 49.5% KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom AS721 1012 751 261 25.8% DNIC DoD Network Information Center AS14654 260 6 254 97.7% WAYPOR-3 Wayport AS21502 254 3 251 98.8% ASN-NUMERICABLE NUMERICABLE is a cabled network in France, AS9443 357 108 249 69.7% INTERNETPRIMUS-AS-AP Primus Telecommunications AS6140 370 124 246 66.5% IMPSA ImpSat AS25844 244 16 228 93.4% SASMFL-2 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP AS1221 805 578 227 28.2% ASN-TELSTRA Telstra Pty Ltd AS2386 847 623 224 26.4% ADCS-1 AT&T Data Communications Services AS6198 433 221 212 49.0% BNS-14 BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS22291 291 87 204 70.1% CC04 Charter Communications AS3356 647 446 201 31.1% LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications AS4814 206 6 200 97.1% CHINA169-BBN CNCGROUP IP network¡ªChina169 Beijing Broadband Network Total 23725 8137 15588 65.7% Top 30 total Possible Bogus Routes 24.138.80.0/20 AS11260 AHSICHCL Andara High Speed Internet c/o Halifax Cable Ltd. 24.246.0.0/17 AS7018 ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services 24.246.38.0/24 AS25994 NPGCAB NPG Cable, INC 24.246.128.0/18 AS7018 ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services 64.46.27.0/24 AS8674 NETNOD-IX Netnod Internet Exchange Sverige AB 64.57.160.0/19 AS3561 CWU Cable & Wireless USA 64.92.128.0/19 AS3561 CWU Cable & Wireless USA 64.127.0.0/18 AS7018 ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services 64.209.192.0/18 AS3561 CWU Cable & Wireless USA 69.26.32.0/19 AS17307 VIRTEL-15 Virtela Communications 132.0.0.0/10 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 137.0.0.0/13 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 138.136.0.0/13 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 158.0.0.0/13 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 192.30.93.0/24 AS17757 HPAUS-AP HP Australia 192.30.94.0/24 AS17757 HPAUS-AP HP Australia 192.30.127.0/24 AS719 LANLINK Elisa Oyj 192.40.105.0/24 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System 192.44.0.0/19 AS702 AS702 MCI EMEA - Commercial IP service provider in Europe 192.70.164.0/24 AS25689 NRCC-2 National Research Council of Canada 192.81.182.0/24 AS719 LANLINK Elisa Oyj 192.81.183.0/24 AS719 LANLINK Elisa Oyj 192.81.184.0/24 AS719 LANLINK Elisa Oyj 192.119.135.0/24 AS270 NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration 192.124.252.0/22 AS680 DFN-IP service G-WiN 192.133.6.0/24 AS4004 GLOBALONE-EQUANT-UK Equant UK & Greece Autonomous System 192.135.50.0/24 AS7018 ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services 192.153.144.0/21 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 192.172.0.0/19 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 192.188.208.0/20 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 192.243.32.0/23 AS2044 PALINA Palin Aquisitions Inc. 196.2.95.0/24 AS8668 TELONE-AS TelOne Zimbabwe P/L 198.23.26.0/24 AS4390 BELLAT-7 Bell Atlantic, Inc. 198.97.72.0/21 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 198.97.80.0/20 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 198.97.88.0/24 AS89 NUSC-1 Naval Underwater Systems Center 198.97.240.0/20 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 198.97.247.0/24 AS3475 DEPART-52 Department of the Navy 198.101.4.0/22 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 198.136.32.0/20 AS19329 MCBCC Martin County Board of County Commissioners 198.144.32.0/19 AS3998 CITY CityNet, Inc. 198.161.87.0/24 AS6539 GTGR GT Group Telecom Services Corp. 198.161.165.0/24 AS852 AGTA Telus Advanced Communications 198.163.155.0/24 AS684 MRN Manitoba Regional Network 198.167.0.0/16 AS7456 INS-51 Interhop Network SERVICES Inc. 198.167.163.0/24 AS15290 ACCA-2 Allstream Corp. Corporation Allstream 198.168.0.0/16 AS701 UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. 198.169.0.0/16 AS803 SASK SaskTel 198.232.133.0/24 AS23075 SKOTOS Skotos Tech, Inc 199.10.0.0/16 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.60.0.0/20 AS271 UBC-3 University of British Columbia 199.96.44.0/23 AS19092 360NE-1 360Networks (USA) Inc. 199.96.46.0/24 AS19092 360NE-1 360Networks (USA) Inc. 199.114.0.0/18 AS568 DISOUN DISO-UNRRA 199.114.0.0/21 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.128.0/18 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.130.0/24 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.132.0/24 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.134.0/24 AS1913 DLA-8 Defense Logistics Agency 199.114.136.0/24 AS1913 DLA-8 Defense Logistics Agency 199.114.138.0/24 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.140.0/24 AS3544 DISAUN DISA/UNRRA 199.114.142.0/24 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.148.0/24 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.150.0/24 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.114.152.0/24 AS1913 DLA-8 Defense Logistics Agency 199.114.154.0/24 AS1733 ADP-41 AF DDN PMO 199.114.156.0/24 AS1913 DLA-8 Defense Logistics Agency 199.114.160.0/24 AS1733 ADP-41 AF DDN PMO 199.120.32.0/19 AS16582 NXLI NEXTLEVEL INTERNET, INC. 199.121.0.0/16 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.123.0.0/18 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.123.16.0/20 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.123.80.0/21 AS721 DNIC DoD Network Information Center 199.189.32.0/19 AS7332 IQUEST IQuest Internet 199.197.8.0/22 AS21814 PARSON-18 Parsons Corp. 199.202.0.0/16 AS701 UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. 202.70.28.0/24 AS4515 ERX-STAR Star Internet Services Ltd. 202.72.64.0/21 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.64.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.65.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.66.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.67.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.68.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.69.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.70.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.71.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.72.0/21 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.72.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.73.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.74.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.75.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.76.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.77.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.78.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.72.79.0/24 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 202.73.128.0/22 AS4058 LINKAGENET-AP CPCNet Hong Kong Ltd. 202.93.0.0/20 AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street 202.133.3.0/24 AS9335 CIP-JAPAN-AS-AP ATT IPlus 202.160.128.0/23 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.131.0/24 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.132.0/22 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.136.0/22 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.142.0/24 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.144.0/24 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.145.0/24 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.146.0/24 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.147.0/24 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.148.0/22 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.156.0/23 AS9282 LEXICON-AS Lexicon Systems Pty Ltd 202.160.158.0/23 AS17642 RDSL-NATIONAL-AS Request Broadband BGP AS number 202.164.128.0/19 AS9654 CYBERSPACE-AP P/H Padilla Bldg., Emerald Avenue 202.164.224.0/19 AS7599 IPXC-AS-AP IP Exchange 203.32.4.0/23 AS7617 203.62.0.0/17 AS7572 AARNET-ACT-RNO Australian Academic and Reasearch Network (AARNet) 203.84.192.0/19 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 203.84.192.0/20 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 203.84.208.0/20 AS17433 PHILWEB-AP PhilWeb.Com, Inc. 203.99.0.0/19 AS17746 ORCONINTERNET-NZ-AP Orcon Internet 203.170.14.0/23 AS6648 ASN-SKYINTERNET Autonomous System Number peering of Sky Internet - BAYANTEL Inc. - Philppines 203.210.69.0/24 AS17536 PRODIGY-AS-AP Prodidgy Telecommunications 204.154.125.0/24 AS3952 TELLAB-1 TELLABS Operations, Inc. 204.154.126.0/24 AS3952 TELLAB-1 TELLABS Operations, Inc. 204.154.127.0/24 AS3952 TELLAB-1 TELLABS Operations, Inc. 204.194.110.0/23 AS30653 EXOBI Exobit Networks Inc. 205.150.0.0/15 AS701 UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. 206.167.57.0/24 AS376 RISQR-3 Reseau Interordinateurs Scientique Quebecois (RISQ) 206.191.64.0/18 AS15290 ACCA-2 Allstream Corp. Corporation Allstream 206.251.69.0/24 AS27429 TIL-33 Telesat International Ltd. 206.253.190.0/23 AS8123 POLYBA Polybase 207.47.254.0/24 AS701 UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. 207.231.96.0/19 AS11194 NUNETI NuNet Inc 208.81.187.0/24 AS19194 SNL-8 Sentris Network LLC 209.172.0.0/18 AS7770 TRTI Triton Technologies, Inc. 209.205.69.0/24 AS21578 Universidad autonoma de Bucaramanga 209.205.70.0/24 AS21578 Universidad autonoma de Bucaramanga 209.205.81.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A. 209.205.82.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A. 209.205.84.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A. 209.213.32.0/19 AS10629 INS-52 Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.48.0/24 AS10629 INS-52 Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.49.0/24 AS10629 INS-52 Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.50.0/24 AS10629 INS-52 Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.251.0.0/19 AS11036 SISCOM-1 SISCOM, Inc 216.37.110.0/23 AS4264 CERFN California Education and Research Federation Network 216.96.128.0/18 AS7018 ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services 216.145.130.0/23 AS11937 TRXI TRX Inc. 216.145.132.0/22 AS11937 TRXI TRX Inc. 216.145.156.0/24 AS20304 JIS-32 JVLNET Internet Services 216.145.158.0/24 AS20304 JIS-32 JVLNET Internet Services 216.145.176.0/21 AS20304 JIS-32 JVLNET Internet Services 216.145.177.0/24 AS20304 JIS-32 JVLNET Internet Services 216.145.178.0/24 AS20304 JIS-32 JVLNET Internet Services 216.145.184.0/21 AS10758 INWAVE INWave Internet, Inc 216.145.200.0/21 AS20304 JIS-32 JVLNET Internet Services 216.171.96.0/20 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.186.151.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.186.152.0/21 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.186.160.0/23 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.186.164.0/22 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.186.192.0/22 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.186.198.0/23 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.186.248.0/23 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications Please see http://www.cidr-report.org for the full report ------------------------------------ Copies of this report are mailed to: nanog(a)merit.edu eof-list(a)ripe.net apops(a)apops.net routing-wg(a)ripe.net afnog(a)afnog.org swinog(a)swinog.ch

2 1

RE: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ?
by Matt Ryan 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

Cachelogic put appliances into the network that both monitor traffic (semi-deep packet inspection) and also cache P2P content to take the load of your network. While I don't think they made the figures up it's worth bearing in mind they are selling a 'solution' to the problem they highlight. For the record we have seen P2P traffic over 50% of our bandwidth utilisation - if bittorrent is the largest proportion then it could reach 35% of total bandwidth. Matt. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Deepak Jain Sent: 04 November 2004 21:09 To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? http://in.tech.yahoo.com/041103/137/2ho4i.html According to Reuters, BT is more traffic than web/other forms of traffic? I'm thinking the sampling methodology here might be a little skewed. Then again, I could be biased. Any other facts that would support this? DJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Life in Broadband www.telewest.co.uk The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. ==============================================================================

1 0

Sago Networks
by Hannigan, Martin 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

Can someone from Sago please contact me regarding a problem with a customer? Thanks, -M -- Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663 VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018 Network Engineer IV Operations & Infrastructure hannigan(a)verisign.com

1 0

can someone from Savvis and Radianz contact me?
by David Meyer 04 Nov '04

04 Nov '04

I'm looking for some multicast information. Thanks, Dave

1 0

OT: looking for a contact at US .mil
by Gadi Evron 04 Nov '04

04 Nov '04

I realize some may believe this is not of a very high priority, but I believe it is important. I apologize for going off-topic. There seems to be a network misconfiguration over at .mil which our intrusion detection systems caught. We are getting SNMP requests from them (their network is 147.238.0.0/16 and ours is 147.237.0.0/16. I suppose somebody probably typed a 7 where they should have typed an 8). I've done quite a bit to try and contact somebody over there - I even got somebody to talk to me on the phone in 4 distinct occasions and considering their whois information is outdated to the extreme - I am pretty proud. Yet the traffic continues. It doesn't really bother our network, but hey, this ain't right. I tried contacting them through some private contact as well.. but I figure that somebody over there who *cares* probably should see this raised flag. I appreciate your help, Gadi Evron.

2 1

Low latency forwarding failure detection
by John Kristoff 04 Nov '04

04 Nov '04

Not receiving any response for over a week after posting this query to cisco-nsp I thought perhaps folks here might have some input. In my scenario, Cisco is the likely gear involved, but even if people have vendor neutral feedback about this I'd be interesting in hearing it. From: John Kristoff <jtk(a)northwestern.edu> To: cisco-nsp(a)puck.nether.net Subject: Low latency forwarding failure detection Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:14:57 -0500 X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) I've got a situation where something like HSRP seems appropriate for a redundant default gateway configuration. However, this application will want very low latency in finding and using the alternative gateway. Note, while the hosts have two NICs, they are both on the same subnet with one interface the default source and sink as long as it has link. I don't get to change this behavior. Default HSRP failure detection time however is likely not quick enough to bring a standby interface up to get traffic moving again. I see that HSRP provides for hello and hold times in milliseconds. I have a few questions for people who may have had a need to get very low latency recovery of links and routers. Have you used HSRP to do this? On a typical local ethernet (gig) LAN configuration, what sorts of latencies and packet loss have you seen during a failure event? I'm cco-familiar with GLBP. It appears to have essentially the same timing knobs with the ability to actively load balance traffic. Is my assumption that some traffic will not experience any packet loss if it is not using the failed path correct? For anyone who has used this, was the added complexity of this protocol worth it? As a general question... are people looking at implementing BFD? <http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/bfd-charter.html> Here I'm draft-familiar with what this is and I believe some vendors have code for it, but I've yet to try it. I believe the spec is held up for security and IESG review. This work looks very useful for some related applications going forward. For this crowd, is this deployable and useful for minimizing forwarding failure time? This doesn't appear to be on the roadmap for HSRP/GLBP from what I can tell, but perhaps that would a worthwhile application of BFD? Are there other things people are doing (besides plain old load sharing) to get very low latency failover? John

2 1

Re: Low latency forwarding failure detection
by Fergie (Paul Ferguson) 04 Nov '04

04 Nov '04

John, I'm using GLBP round-robin in a specific scenario with "ip routing" as the tracking mechanism, and only in this one specific segment if the network (OSPF elsewhere), with EIGRP as the routing protocol between R1, R2, R3, and R4: -----+---FE----+----- | | R1 R2 | | T3 T3 | | R3 R4 | | ----+----FE---+----- GLBP works very well here for us based on EIGRP routing metrics. There's a very good GLBP config white paper on CCO. No sure if this answers your question, or not.... - ferg -- John Kristoff <jtk(a)northwestern.edu> wrote: I'm cco-familiar with GLBP. It appears to have essentially the same timing knobs with the ability to actively load balance traffic. Is my assumption that some traffic will not experience any packet loss if it is not using the failed path correct? For anyone who has used this, was the added complexity of this protocol worth it? -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net

1 0

Network Monitoring System - Recommendations?
by Charlie Khanna - NextWeb 04 Nov '04

04 Nov '04

Hi - I was interested in finding out what software applications other ISPs are using for network monitoring? For example: 1) Overall network health - uptime reports 2) Backup router config automatically 3) Bandwidth reporting (or integration with an MRTG-type app) 4) SNMP trap support (BGP/OSPF session drops - emails out) 5) Database back end (port info into or over to other apps) I'm just looking for something well rounded for a small ISP. I've heard about OpenNMS and other apps but I'd like to get everyone's feedback. Thanks! -Charlie

11 16

PathControl vs. Internap(hardware)
by Dave Temkin 04 Nov '04

04 Nov '04

Has anyone done any comparisons recently? I know that RouteScience changed their model of not providing the hardware anymore, but I was overall satisfied with their product when I had it before. Has anyone stacked the Internap (former NetVMG/Sockeye) soft against the PathControl software? What were your impressions if so? Thanks, -Dave

2 1