- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

RE: AOL tarpitting?
by James Ashton 06 Nov '04

06 Nov '04

AOLs feedback loop seams to take a month or so to take effect. -James -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Jeftovic Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 2:26 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: AOL tarpitting? had AOL tarpitting gotten quite a bit more aggressive in the last few days? It happened to us and we signed up for their "feedback loop" and rerouted our mail to them via another route. The new route was tarpitted within 24 hours and absolutely nothing was communicated to us about it via the "feedback loop". Does that thing actually work? Any contacts, on or off list who could advise? -mark -- Mark Jeftovic <markjr(a)easydns.com> Co-founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc. ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225 fx. +1-(416)-535-0237

3 2

what's a good way to annoy the hell out of somebody at chello.be?
by Paul Vixie 06 Nov '04

06 Nov '04

a customer of chello.be has been repeating a dns dynamic update against my zone every four minutes since october 20. chello's abuse reporting channel is no doubt full of spam reports. their noc no doubt doesn't care about end-user problems. i nmap'd the offending box: Starting nmap 3.50 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-11-05 17:24 GMT Interesting ports on cable-62-205-122-245.upc.chello.be (62.205.122.245): (The 1638 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed) PORT STATE SERVICE 9/tcp open discard 13/tcp open daytime 21/tcp open ftp 25/tcp open smtp 37/tcp filtered time 53/tcp open domain 111/tcp open rpcbind 113/tcp filtered auth 135/tcp filtered msrpc 137/tcp filtered netbios-ns 138/tcp filtered netbios-dgm 139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn 445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds 515/tcp open printer 548/tcp open afpovertcp 1024/tcp open kdm 1025/tcp open NFS-or-IIS 1026/tcp filtered LSA-or-nterm 8009/tcp open ajp13 8080/tcp open http-proxy 10000/tcp open snet-sensor-mgmt and i connected to every one of those services that i had a client for, and sent mail to the postmaster (using telnet and the @[] notation), but i think i have not done enough to set off any kind of intrusion detection systems. what's a socially acceptable way to be rude enough to make these people pay attention to me? i'm asking not just for this host -- i'm hoping there's a "community standard" i can follow, and recommend that others follow. the box is raw debian. in fact its hostname (according to its exim and bind) is "debian". i don't think anybody's reading its "postmaster" mailbox. i do not think there is any evil intent in the updates they won't stop sending me, but they're filling my logs and i don't want to firewall them.

6 5

Interland.net noc contact
by Matt Hess 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

Anyone have a contact for Interland.net's noc? I don't see them on the noc list.. (http://puck.nether.net/netops/) and the interland customer care (HA!) reps have no concept of what the word "proactive" means. Drop me a line off list please.. thanks.

1 0

AOL tarpitting?
by Mark Jeftovic 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

had AOL tarpitting gotten quite a bit more aggressive in the last few days? It happened to us and we signed up for their "feedback loop" and rerouted our mail to them via another route. The new route was tarpitted within 24 hours and absolutely nothing was communicated to us about it via the "feedback loop". Does that thing actually work? Any contacts, on or off list who could advise? -mark -- Mark Jeftovic <markjr(a)easydns.com> Co-founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc. ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225 fx. +1-(416)-535-0237

2 1

Re: rfc1978 help
by Jeroen Massar 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 14:29 -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote: > I've been seeing MX's resolving to 127.0.0.1 for a few months now, and > planning to write some sort of envelope from checking apparatus to refuse email > who's envelope from MX resolves to 127.0.0.1 (and now that you mention it), > rfc1918 address space (and perhaps bogon space as well?)... Better block the internet in that case ;) I heared of BGP feeds that provide 'questionable prefixes' so that one can nicely nullroute those using that system. I still am of the opinion that only accepting verifyable PGP signed mail could slow spammers down a bit, then at least the spambot took the time of generating, distributing and letting people trust the spambots key. Maybe trow in some trust metric ala advogato!? Then again, the spambots will simply find the preconfigured key from an infected user and start using that, save passwords ole, at least one then knows the source it is coming from is really also able to sign it that way, thus most likely is the problem person, unless the virus of course redistributes the pgp keys using some nice p2p algo to other worms. (ohoh :) This would at least take away most of the virusses sending random sources. But getting everybody to do PGP-signed mail is asking the same thing as asking people to turn of sending html emails, A somewhat similar scheme does work for RIPE-db updates, but the people submitting there have probably some clue on how to configure their boxes and unfortunately we are of course talking about $lusers. Spam already lost it from virusses and the spam coming forth from misconfigured antivirus tools sending 'hi you send a virus' alike messages. Above setup should be able to work for closed communities like mailinglists where only a few number of people post, if you want to post, sign your message, mailinglist software could then verify the key and only pass it on if the member is subscribed and the signature is valid. A virus picking random addresses and sending to existing messages in the mailbox, thus having 'valid' source/dest combinations doesn't make much of chance then unless it figures out the pgp key and the password. Then again I just might be a ... http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html ;) BTW1: that because you quote above my complete message, my message becomes part of your signature and my mailer nicely ignores it ;) BTW2: Ooops... discussing spammy related things on NANOG.... Greets, Jeroen

1 0

RE: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations?
by Charlie Khanna - NextWeb 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

We actually use it now and its fine for what it does - however, I don't think it provides a real integrated solution. -Charlie _____ From: Erik Amundson [mailto:chauncy@myevilempire.net] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:21 AM To: Richard J. Sears; Charlie Khanna - NextWeb Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Not a lot of people seem to be using it, but at my organization, we just love WhatsUp Gold by IPSwitch. We first started using it about 4 years ago, when it was a very simple product that pretty much just did SNMP and ping-polling. Now, it's a much more advanced system that can do loads of things... Check it out....www.ipswitch.com - Erik _____ From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu on behalf of Richard J. Sears Sent: Thu 11/4/2004 9:11 AM To: Charlie Khanna - NextWeb Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Network Monitoring System - Recommendations? Hi Charlie - We use JFFNMS here (http://www.jffnms.org/) We have it monitoring BGP with our 6 backbone providers, all of our T1's (300 or so), DSL lines, dedicated servers, backing up all of our router configs, talking to our F5s, pretty much everything you are asking for. We use it extensively to grab traps and notify my NOC of any problems. Overall I would say that it is monitoring over 15,000 connections and pieces of hardware. We have its bandwidth monitoring and tracking talking directly to our billing engine and allow our customers the ability to log into it and view all of their stats as well. We don't use it to monitor uptime as we utilize different hardware for that but my guess is that with some minor tweaking it could do that as well. Hope this helps. On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:01:42 -0700 "Charlie Khanna - NextWeb" <charlie(a)nextweb.net> wrote: > Hi - I was interested in finding out what software applications other ISPs > are using for network monitoring? For example: > > > > 1) Overall network health - uptime reports > > 2) Backup router config automatically > > 3) Bandwidth reporting (or integration with an MRTG-type app) > > 4) SNMP trap support (BGP/OSPF session drops - emails out) > > 5) Database back end (port info into or over to other apps) > > > > I'm just looking for something well rounded for a small ISP. I've heard > about OpenNMS and other apps but I'd like to get everyone's feedback. > Thanks! > > > > -Charlie > > > ****************************************** Richard J. Sears Vice President American Internet Services ---------------------------------------------------- rsears(a)adnc.com http://www.adnc.com ---------------------------------------------------- 858.576.4272 - Phone 858.427.2401 - Fax INOC-DBA - 6130 ---------------------------------------------------- I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . "Work like you don't need the money, love like you've never been hurt and dance like you do when nobody's watching."

5 4

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Table Analysis 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 06 Nov, 2004 Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 150267 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 88743 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 71812 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18370 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 15942 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 7465 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2428 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 73 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.5 Max AS path length visible: 25 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 8 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 15 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1348239976 Equivalent to 80 /8s, 92 /16s and 130 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 36.4 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 58.8 Percentage of available address space allocated: 61.9 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 69113 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 29109 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 14393 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 27212 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 14288 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2160 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 650 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 330 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 165911680 Equivalent to 9 /8s, 227 /16s and 156 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 75.7 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 23552-24575 APNIC Address Blocks 58/7, 60/7, 202/7, 210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8 ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 85556 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 51860 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 65373 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 23358 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 9669 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3474 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 949 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 4.3 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 234612736 Equivalent to 13 /8s, 251 /16s and 232 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 69.9 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647,29695-30719, 31744-33791 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/6, 68/7, 70/7, 72/8, 198/7, 204/6, 208/7 and 216/8 RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 27821 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 19441 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 24696 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 16225 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 5978 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3206 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1024 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 5.1 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 25 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 176087168 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 126 /16s and 224 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 61.7 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-34815 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 80/5, 88/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/7, 212/7 and 217/8 LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 6541 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 2359 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 6389 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 3935 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 401 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 115 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 77 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.0 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 19 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 16420096 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 250 /16s and 141 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 48.9 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671 LACNIC Address Blocks 200/7 Emerging AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 1234 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 690 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 858 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 670 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 92 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 20 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 12 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 2069248 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 31 /16s and 147 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 12.3 AfriNIC AS Blocks <none> AfriNIC Address Blocks 196/8 APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4134 856 4407 163 Data Communications Bureau 1221 801 1183 574 Telstra Pty Ltd 9583 546 41 103 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 4766 545 3408 268 Korea Internet Exchange for " 4755 377 133 58 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 17676 369 5516 54 XTAGE CORPORATION 2907 354 1857 328 SINET Japan 9443 353 69 79 Primus Telecommunications 9929 344 161 33 China Netcom Corp. 703 317 346 244 UUNET 17557 315 23 156 Pakistan Telecom 2764 287 273 235 connect.com.au pty ltd 7474 264 268 196 Optus Communications Pty Ltd 4802 234 28 142 Wantree Development 9942 233 72 124 COMindico Australia 9498 231 81 53 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 9800 230 380 70 CHINA UNICOM 7563 227 48 164 Korea Internet Infrastructure 10036 210 19 191 C&M Communication Co. Ltd. 4814 206 232 6 China Telecom (Group) ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 7018 1427 6681 994 AT&T WorldNet Services 701 1236 8415 886 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 721 1023 21016 298 DLA Systems Automation Center 1239 921 2880 610 Sprint 2386 848 530 609 AT&T Data Communications Serv 6197 809 380 351 BellSouth Network Solutions, 4323 797 671 218 Time Warner Telecom 18566 751 208 6 Covad Communications 209 660 3435 504 Qwest 3356 646 10942 444 Level 3 Communications, LLC 20115 570 430 306 Charter Communications 3561 552 2416 416 Cable & Wireless USA 852 518 1142 401 Telus Advanced Communications 7843 496 709 93 Adelphia Corp. 7132 445 8288 377 SBC Internet Services 6198 437 377 202 BellSouth Network Solutions, 705 436 163 276 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 6478 425 737 102 AT&T Worldnet Services 27364 414 36 19 Armstrong Cable Services 5668 411 87 18 Century Telephone RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 702 635 2026 527 UUNET - Commercial IP service 3320 297 2484 234 Deutsche Telekom AG 8220 281 463 267 COLT Internet - International 3301 277 1099 267 TeliaNet Sweden 21502 254 40 3 NUMERICABLE is a cabled netwo 680 251 2025 239 DFN-IP service G-WiN 3246 219 477 215 Song Networks 13083 217 51 8 Mannesmann Datenverarbeitung 1257 208 743 179 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network 8708 203 115 184 Romania Data Systems S.A. 5515 193 842 141 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 786 176 1794 176 The JANET IP Service 6746 161 30 130 Dynamic Network Technologies, 8866 160 20 7 Bulgarian Telecommunication C 3215 158 940 77 France Telecom Transpac 719 157 288 102 LANLINK autonomous system 3269 149 1259 67 TELECOM ITALIA 5400 148 207 119 BT Ignite European Backbone 25186 148 154 104 France Telecom Transpac's Tra 3303 131 610 129 Swisscom Ltd LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6140 347 139 69 ImpSat 8151 308 455 134 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 16814 212 13 7 NSS, S.A. 11172 208 100 55 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 6147 185 94 20 Telefonica Del Peru 11664 164 12 35 Keytech SA 6505 138 90 94 Global One Communicaoes Ltda 7303 137 62 24 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 6503 122 164 83 AVANTEL, S.A. 11992 101 9 31 Integrated Systems 14117 98 6 4 Telefonica del Sur S.A. 11556 96 48 2 Cable-Wireless Panama 6535 84 7 19 Chilesat Servicios Empresari 11311 84 8 24 Sinectis S.A. 10481 82 32 7 Prima S.A. 4270 80 18 9 Red de Interconexion Universi 14420 80 5 33 ANDINATEL S.A. 15311 77 23 37 Telefonica Empresas 5639 75 8 8 Telecommunications Services o 11340 71 21 47 Red Universitaria Nacional AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 3741 272 649 230 The Internet Solution 5536 113 16 4 Internet Egypt Network 2018 101 297 97 Tertiary Education Network 2905 93 259 65 The Internetworking Company o 20928 52 16 1 Noor Advanced Technologies AS 9129 33 3 4 UUNET Kenya 24835 33 34 7 RAYA Telecom - Egypt 6713 31 42 10 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 5713 26 125 24 Telkom SA Ltd 8524 25 1 4 AUCEGYPT Autonomous System 16637 22 10 19 Johnnic e-Ventures 10798 18 1 12 Standard Bank of South Africa 12258 18 3 12 Vodacom Internet Company 8452 17 20 5 TEDATA 12455 17 4 2 Jambonet Autonomous system 21280 16 2 3 Swift Global Kenya Ltd.Is an 8346 15 7 14 SONATEL-AS Autonomous System 15706 15 4 2 Sudatel Internet Exchange Aut 15808 13 1 2 Communication Solutions Ltd i 17148 13 1 7 First National Bank Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 18566 751 745 Covad Communications 721 1023 725 DLA Systems Automation Center 4134 856 693 Data Communications Bureau 4323 797 579 Time Warner Telecom 6197 809 458 BellSouth Network Solutions, 9583 546 443 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 7843 496 403 Adelphia Corp. 27364 414 395 Armstrong Cable Services 5668 411 393 Century Telephone 22773 400 383 Cox Communications, Inc. Atla 6467 400 370 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 22909 409 351 Comcast Cable Corporation 701 1236 350 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 6478 425 323 AT&T Worldnet Services 4755 377 319 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 17676 369 315 XTAGE CORPORATION 1239 921 311 Sprint 9929 344 311 China Netcom Corp. 4355 392 293 EarthLink, Inc. 6140 347 278 ImpSat List of Unregistered ASNs (Global) ---------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 65006 PRIVATE 84.18.32.0/19 33831 * 65217 PRIVATE 192.102.236.0/24 217 University of Minnes 1877 UNALLOCATED 192.108.199.0/24 1876 Southern Methodist U 5555 UNALLOCATED 192.156.8.0/24 721 DLA Systems Automati 65529 PRIVATE 216.21.199.0/24 14697 VDot.Net 33507 UNALLOCATED 216.94.118.0/24 701 UUNET Technologies, 65529 PRIVATE 216.152.237.0/24 14697 VDot.Net 65000 PRIVATE 217.68.56.0/22 29263 HAAGnet, municipalit Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 132.0.0.0/10 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 137.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 158.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.44.0.0/19 702 UUNET - Commercial IP service 192.70.164.0/24 25689 National Research Council of 192.83.16.0/20 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.32.0/19 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.96.0/22 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.100.0/24 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.84.205.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.119.135.0/24 270 NASA 192.135.50.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 192.136.79.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.172.0.0/19 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.172.11.0/24 721 DLA Systems Automation Center Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:19 /9:3 /10:6 /11:15 /12:61 /13:138 /14:314 /15:554 /16:8110 /17:2266 /18:3925 /19:9790 /20:10385 /21:7964 /22:11021 /23:12683 /24:82125 /25:249 /26:236 /27:134 /28:68 /29:55 /30:113 /31:0 /32:33 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 18566 736 751 Covad Communications 6197 657 809 BellSouth Network Solutions, 2386 613 848 AT&T Data Communications Serv 7018 578 1427 AT&T WorldNet Services 27364 398 414 Armstrong Cable Services 702 389 635 UUNET - Commercial IP service 9583 382 546 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 1239 366 921 Sprint 4766 365 545 Korea Internet Exchange for " 5668 356 411 Century Telephone 701 346 1236 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 6198 318 437 BellSouth Network Solutions, 6467 300 400 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 6517 281 305 Yipes Communications, Inc. 20115 279 570 Charter Communications 9929 275 344 China Netcom Corp. 13609 266 309 Choice One Communications Inc 14824 258 268 NewSouth Communications Corp. 4323 256 797 Time Warner Telecom 21502 251 254 NUMERICABLE is a cabled netwo Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:4 8:11 12:1434 13:1 15:5 16:2 17:3 20:5 24:746 32:67 33:2 38:81 40:55 44:3 47:2 52:3 55:1 56:3 57:22 60:3 61:615 62:496 63:1845 64:2445 65:2076 66:2462 67:447 68:537 69:755 70:36 72:2 80:516 81:548 82:306 83:193 84:47 128:128 129:164 130:84 131:185 132:26 134:186 135:26 136:187 137:85 138:184 139:39 140:195 141:108 142:126 143:115 144:159 145:42 146:295 147:95 148:328 149:112 150:95 151:64 152:133 153:68 154:2 155:131 156:58 157:67 158:133 159:163 160:61 161:73 162:379 163:80 164:216 165:157 166:118 167:222 168:338 169:123 170:298 171:9 192:5663 193:2921 194:2167 195:1510 196:588 198:3892 199:3299 200:3814 201:23 202:4939 203:5746 204:3571 205:2078 206:2337 207:2625 208:2122 209:3076 210:1516 211:641 212:1132 213:1219 214:223 215:31 216:3681 217:1058 218:176 219:81 220:273 221:65 222:22 End of report

1 0

Sweet 16 for Morris Worm....
by Fergie (Paul Ferguson) 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

Just ran across a reminder that at around midnight on Nov. 2, 1988, the Morris worm was released. Happy belated 16th birthday. :-) - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net

1 0

BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ?
by Deepak Jain 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

http://in.tech.yahoo.com/041103/137/2ho4i.html According to Reuters, BT is more traffic than web/other forms of traffic? I'm thinking the sampling methodology here might be a little skewed. Then again, I could be biased. Any other facts that would support this? DJ

10 10

Fwd: The Cidr Report
by David Barak 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

--- cidr-report(a)potaroo.net wrote: > AS701 6090 892 5198 85.4% UU > UUNET Technologies, Inc. > AS705 2258 1009 1249 55.3% UU > UUNET Technologies, Inc. Top 20 Net Increased Routes per Originating AS Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description 4861 1224->6085 AS701 UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. 1820 437->2257 AS705 UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. 758 268->1026 AS7046 UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. Any idea what happened here? Is this long-term? ===== David Barak -fully RFC 1925 compliant- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com

1 0