- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: [political pontification] Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers
by Eric Brunner-Williams at a VSAT somewhere 30 Sep '05

30 Sep '05

> Are there operational issues to attempt to make this thread remotely on > point for NANOG? Probably not. Its just bits, and whether the bits are all > 0x000 or quasi-random distributions between 0x000 and 0x177 is water under > somebody else's bridge. The constraint-space is "solve in applications" and > not "solve in infrastructure". s/0x177/0x377/. I'm such a dolt. ENOCOFFEE. The 8th bit is the point, for some values of point. > VC: yes, that's the current vector at any rate although I gather there is > still effort being put into constraint rules at both infrastructure and > application level? Back when I still worked for a well-heeled, if only through pyramid-scams on investers in the North American numbering and speculative DNS markets, employer and could afford to go to IETF meetings, I did talk to people in the MTA and other lines of work about foo-in-infrastructure. One can hope that people do the correct things, but sometimes they need to be reminded what "correct" and "do" mean. I wonder what goodies and treats await me in this tasty tarball ... after all "sendmail X is 8 bit transparent" ... ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/.beta/antry/smX-0.0.Beta2.0.tar.gz Eric

1 0

Re: [political pontification] Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers
by Eric Brunner-Williams at a VSAT somewhere 30 Sep '05

30 Sep '05

Vint, I don't think I know any longer, if I ever did, what "IDN" means. Alternatives to Unicode were proposed during the IETF IDN WG lifetime, both as a single normative reference, and as a normative reference. Likewise an intermediate tables redefinition of Unicode, mentioned in my last pointless comment. Then there is the possibility of research on the problems of character repitoires and interoperable data exchange -- before engineering some solution(s). Proposed to the IRTF Chair and rejected. Are there operational issues to attempt to make this thread remotely on point for NANOG? Probably not. Its just bits, and whether the bits are all 0x000 or quasi-random distributions between 0x000 and 0x177 is water under somebody else's bridge. The constraint-space is "solve in applications" and not "solve in infrastructure". The question of semantic scope is interesting in theory, which was the point of my note to Tony Li, if not tractible in a particular context. Eric

1 0

GSM Association and NeuStar Sign Agreement to Offer Root DNS Services
by Stephane Bortzmeyer 30 Sep '05

30 Sep '05

It can be of operational interest or it can fuel a new flame about alternative DNS roots. http://www.neustar.com/pressroom/files/announcements/ns_pr_09282005.pdf GSM Association and NeuStar Sign Agreement to Offer Root DNS Services to More than 680 Global GSM Mobile Operators ... NeuStar's Root DNS service will serve two functions: first, to register domain names under the suffixes "gprs" and "3gppnetwork.org," which are used to register private domain names that allow operators to retrieve routing information when a subscriber accesses data and multimedia services on a roaming or home network. For example, a U.S. mobile subscriber traveling on business in Singapore will be able to access a video or audio file using their mobile device while roaming on a local GSM network. Additionally, NeuStar will operate the master DNS root server and provide updates to GRX (GPRS Roaming Exchange) and MMS (Multimedia Messaging Service) providers, allowing mobile operators to access updated DNS routing information. ...

4 3

Re: Weird DNS issues for domains
by Brandon Butterworth 30 Sep '05

30 Sep '05

> Besides, what sort of "dumb SMTP client" did you have in mind? > Formmail scripts? Worms? Outlook Express? I can't say I'd miss mail > from any of those. Pot, kettle... Yours seem to have come via a train wreck of mua/mta's > From owner-nanog(a)merit.edu Fri Sep 30 08:42:11 2005 > Delivered-To: nanog-outgoing(a)trapdoor.merit.edu > Delivered-To: nanog(a)trapdoor.merit.edu > Delivered-To: nanog(a)segue.merit.edu > Delivered-To: nanog(a)nanog.org > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Path: not-for-mail > From: abuse(a)cabal.org.uk (Peter) > Newsgroups: newsgate.nanog > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:41:26 +0000 (UTC) > Organization: cabal.org.uk listgate, Warwickshire, UK > Lines: 27 > NNTP-Posting-Host: dopiaza.cabal.org.uk > X-Trace: dopiaza.cabal.org.uk 1128066086 12308 82.71.81.27 (30 Sep 2005 07:41:26 GMT) > X-Complaints-To: usenet(a)dopiaza.cabal.org.uk > NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:41:26 +0000 (UTC) > X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) > Originator: abuse(a)dopiaza.cabal.org.uk (Peter) > X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.71.81.26 > X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: news(a)cabal.org.uk > X-Spam-Hammy-Tokens: 0.000-+--H*F:U*abuse, > 0.000-+--HX-Complaints-To:sk:usenet@, 0.000-+--H*M:cabal, > 0.000-+--H*M:dopiaza, 0.000-+--H*r:news > X-Spam-Bayes-Score: 0.0000 > X-Spam-Spammy-Tokens: 0.994-8--formmail, 0.993-+--MAIL, > 0.954-+--H*r:sk:punt-1., 0.938-+--H*Ad:D*org.uk, 0.927-+--H*Ad:D*uk > X-Spam-Score-Description: > * 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO > * -1.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% > * [score: 0.0000] > * -0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > Subject: Re: Weird DNS issues for domains > X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) > X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on punt-1.mooli.org.uk) > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu > Sender: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu spam and virus rating on outgoing is pointless nobody in their right mind is going to use them. > Path: not-for-mail I agree, all that nntp stuff is pointless too brandon

2 1

Internet router
by Ronald W. Jean 30 Sep '05

30 Sep '05

Can someone tell me who own this router IP 65.198.220.90? I am unable to reach destination IPs when I send a source addr of 70.0.0.0. I am trying to determine if this 70.0.0.0 addr space is being blocked. Ronald W. Jean Network Engineer Miller Technologies Group LLC 973.676.3152 973.676.3153 www.millertechgrp.com <http://www.millertechgrp.com/> Ronald.Jean(a)millertechgrp.com <http://www.millertechgrp.com>

7 10

Re: Internet router
by MARLON BORBA 29 Sep '05

29 Sep '05

ARIN's whois to your rescue: http://ws.arin.net/whois/?queryinput=!%20NET-65-198-220-0-1 OrgName: GEORGIA PUBLIC WEB OrgID: GPW Address: 1470 RIVER EDGE PARKWAY City: ATLANTA StateProv: GA PostalCode: 30328 Country: US [...] Abraços, Marlon Borba, CISSP. -- Nova campanha: Centro de Resposta a Incidentes de Segurança da Justiça Federal - Vamos criar! -- >>> "Ronald W. Jean" <ronald.jean(a)millertechgrp.com> 29/9/2005 13:23:21 >>> Can someone tell me who own this router IP 65.198.220.90? I am unable to reach destination IPs when I send a source addr of 70.0.0.0. I am trying to determine if this 70.0.0.0 addr space is being blocked. Ronald W. Jean Network Engineer Miller Technologies Group LLC 973.676.3152 973.676.3153 www.millertechgrp.com <http://www.millertechgrp.com/> Ronald.Jean(a)millertechgrp.com <http://www.millertechgrp.com>

1 0

I am sorry
by Peter Dambier 29 Sep '05

29 Sep '05

The bad address, came from replying to this posting: -------- Original Message -------- From: - Thu Sep 29 08:26:32 2005 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: <alh-ietf(a)tndh.net> X-Flags: 0000 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to peter(a)peter-dambier.de Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2005 00:06:00 -0000 Received: from bdsl.66.15.163.216.gte.net (EHLO tndh.net) [66.15.163.216] by mx0.gmx.net (mx030) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2005 02:06:00 +0200 Received: from eaglet (127.0.0.1:3574) by tndh.net with [XMail 1.17 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id <SC6117> for <peter(a)peter-dambier.de> from <alh-ietf(a)tndh.net>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:05:46 -0700 From: Tony Hain <alh-ietf(a)tndh.net> To: 'Tony Li' <tony.li(a)tony.li>, 'Stephen Sprunk' <stephen(a)sprunk.org> Cc: <peter(a)peter-dambier.de>, "'North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes'" <nanog(a)merit.edu> Subject: RE: Turkey has switched Root-Servers Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:05:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <380F9BC6-D899-462C-BBA9-34C993CF6436(a)tony.li> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcXD1hHcyDMFqBrsRnW3QujVX8vZggAsfDhw Message-ID: <20050929000601.12440gmx1(a)mx030.gmx.net> X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found) X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam) X-GMX-UID: vkpJY/xReSEkbNTJ43QhaXN1IGRvb0A6 Speaking about censoring in germany: Ask Dr. med. Julius Hellenthal. I helped getting his site online again. Speaking about corruption in europe: Read your local newspaper. Open your eyes. Kind regards, Peter and Karin Dambier -- Peter and Karin Dambier Public-Root Graeffstrasse 14 D-64646 Heppenheim +49-6252-671788 (Telekom) +49-179-108-3978 (O2 Genion) +49-6252-750308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) +1-360-448-1275 (VoIP: freeworldialup.com) mail: peter(a)peter-dambier.de http://iason.site.voila.fr http://www.kokoom.com/iason

1 0

RE: Anyone seen 172.15/16 lately?
by Hannigan, Martin 28 Sep '05

28 Sep '05

> > > > But that doesn't answer the question: (;)) > > NetRange: 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 > CIDR: 172.16.0.0/12 > NetName: IANA-BBLK-RESERVED > > That's the reserved range, he's looking for the /16 "before" that. > Isn't 172.15/16 legacy Sun example space pre 1918? It's all over CCO and Sunsolve in examples and defaults. -M<

5 5

Anyone seen 172.15/16 lately?
by Mark Boolootian 28 Sep '05

28 Sep '05

Can anyone tell me to whom 172.15/16 is allocated? IANA says 172/8 May 93 Various Registries but checks with ARIN, RIPE, APNIC, AFRNIC, and LACNIC don't show anything. gr33tz to Team Furry!! mb --- Mark Boolootian UC Santa Cruz Dislaimer: Any operational content in this email is intentional

4 3

Dep(3)(3)ring
by Richard A Steenbergen 28 Sep '05

28 Sep '05

Since it hasn't hit nanog yet, I guess I'll go ahead and go ahead and be the first to point it out. It seems that Level 3 (3356) and XO (2828) are no longer carrying each other's routes. :) And just when I was about to release http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras/failure.jpg :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras(a)e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)

3 2