- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: Windows 10 Release
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/29/2015 07:32, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 7/29/2015 07:20, Scott Helms wrote: >> It's downloading for me right now, though I did reserve my slot. > > When I checked a few minutes ago it said my PC had passed the tests--now > it says it is downloading. > > Speed and responsiveness "feels" normal. Screen popped up just now--said something to effect of "Now or later?" I said later (haven't been to been in a while, have three other machines to coordinate with). It offered me later today, tomorrow, or the next day! This may hurt after all. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

1 0

Re: Windows 10 Release
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/29/2015 07:20, Scott Helms wrote: > It's downloading for me right now, though I did reserve my slot. When I checked a few minutes ago it said my PC had passed the tests--now it says it is downloading. Speed and responsiveness "feels" normal. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

1 0

Re: Windows 10 Release
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/29/2015 06:58, STARNES, CURTIS wrote: > I see that everyone can download Windows 10 this morning! > There goes my bandwidth. Just checked this PC--apparently I already have it and am "good to go". I was expecting an email or something. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

1 0

Re: Windows 10 Release
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/29/2015 06:58, STARNES, CURTIS wrote: > I see that everyone can download Windows 10 this morning! > There goes my bandwidth. One of us does not understand how "they" said it was going to be done. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

1 0

Re: Working with Spamhaus
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/29/2015 00:58, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 7/29/2015 00:37, Matt Palmer wrote: > >> I suspect that http://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/199.87.233.245 may be >> part >> of it (although it indicates a /21 blocked, not a /17). > > And the removal instructions for that range (SBL) seems crystal clear to > me, but long experience teaches that what is crystal clear to me is > often to clear at all to spammers. I am surprised that I have not been banned again for talking about spam here, so I'll leave you with this (from the information Matt provided): http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL263089 Has these notations: SBL263068 104.224.252.0/27 esited.com 2015-07-25 Spamming for fake products SBL260293 104.224.197.94 whdot.com 2015-06-25 Spam source @104.224.197.94 SBL257796 104.224.205.144/28 whdot.com 2015-05-27 brand-fraud websites hosted on hacked subdomain SBL253760 104.201.2.88 zeroddos.com 2015-04-16 Blackhat SEO spammer hosting @104.201.2.88 SBL249474 104.232.128.0/19 esited.com 2015-03-09 snowshoe range - CLOUDDDOS TECHNOLOGY CO.,LIMITED (AS22552) SBL244070 104.221.128.0/17 esited.com 2015-01-05 snowshoe range - eSited Solutions SBL244052 104.195.0.0/18 esited.com 2015-01-05 snowshoe range - eSited Solutions (NL-1) SBL241541 104.201.0.0/18 esited.com 2014-12-02 Kuang Ren snowshoe range - ZERO DDOS LLC SBL241495 69.87.192.0/20 d esited.com 2014-12-01 Kuang Ren snowshoe range - eSited Solutions (NL-1) SBL241492 23.249.176.0/20 esited.com 2014-12-01 Kuang Ren snowshoe range - GCHAO LLC SBL241491 66.254.160.0/19 esited.com 2014-12-01 Kuang Ren snowshoe range SBL241489 162.247.232.0/21 esited.com 2014-12-01 Kuang Ren snowshoe range SBL234439 104.167.64.0/19 esited.com 2014-09-14 spam emitters - ZERO DDOS LLC SBL226660 199.87.239.226/31 esited.com 2014-06-27 DNS for spam domains SBL223484 167.88.192.0/20 esited.com 2014-05-26 spam emitters - ZERO DDOS LLC SBL207432 199.87.233.92 esited.com 2013-12-12 spam site - 78high.ss99g.com SBL207431 199.87.239.226 esited.com 2013-12-12 spam redirector at zjjj58.com / s9gg.com Removal Procedure To have record SBL263089 (199.87.232.0/21) removed from the SBL, the Abuse/Security representative of esited.com (or the Internet Service Provider responsible for supplying connectivity to 199.87.232.0/21) needs to contact the SBL Team by email (use this link) to explain how the abuse problem has been terminated (we need to know exactly how the issue has been dealt with and that this abuse problem is fully terminated). If the abuse problem that caused this listing has been terminated we will normally remove the listing from the SBL without delay. It is essential that emails to the SBL Team about this SBL listing include this exact ticket information in the email Subject: If you are a representative of esited.com, you also need to see: Current Live esited.com SBL Listings -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

2 1

Re: Working with Spamhaus
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/29/2015 00:37, Matt Palmer wrote: > I suspect that http://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/199.87.233.245 may be part > of it (although it indicates a /21 blocked, not a /17). And the removal instructions for that range (SBL) seems crystal clear to me, but long experience teaches that what is crystal clear to me is often to clear at all to spammers. What is it about Colorado? -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

1 0

Re: Working with Spamhaus
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/28/2015 22:06, Bryan Tong wrote: > If anyone has any advice on how to deal with these people. Please let me > know here or off list. Based on years of experience, the very best way is "don't". Don't profit from spam, and as a result don't deal with Spamhaus at all. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

3 2

Re: Working with Spamhaus
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/29/2015 00:24, goemon(a)anime.net wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Larry Sheldon wrote: >> On 7/28/2015 22:06, Bryan Tong wrote: >>> If anyone has any advice on how to deal with these people. Please let me >>> know here or off list. >> Based on years of experience, the very best way is "don't". > > You have to work pretty hard to get a /17 listed. > >> Don't profit from spam, and as a result don't deal with Spamhaus at all. > > Yep. Some days NANOG sounds like NANA-E. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

1 0

Re: Working with Spamhaus
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/28/2015 22:39, Bryan Tong wrote: > Well, > > I wouldnt have such a disheartened attitude if they would have been > specific or given time to comply. > > I find listing an entire /17 without cause or a report to back it up an > unjust action. Have you tried the widely known services they provide? http://www.spamhaus.org/lookup/ May I direct your reluctant attention to this, just under the first "lookup" box? "If your IP address is listed on one of our IP blocklists; SBL, XBL or PBL (collectively known as the 'Zen' blocklist), this lookup tool will tell you which one and will give you a link to information on what to do." May I focus your unwilling attention on "this lookup tool will tell you which one and will give you a link to information on what to do."? -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

2 1

Re: Windows 10 Release
by Larry Sheldon 29 Jul '15

29 Jul '15

On 7/28/2015 15:45, Nick Olsen wrote: > Wonder if they'll stage the release as apple appeared to have learned > after IOS7 hammered a bunch of networks. Everything I have gotten for my personal machines suggests that it may be months before "my" copies are released. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

1 0