- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: Contact for Hulu
by Kenneth Vedder 28 Sep '23

28 Sep '23

I would also be thankful for a contact at Hulu, we've been having similar issues to what Brad described. Ken V Amplex Internet On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 8:00 AM <nanog-request(a)nanog.org> wrote: > Send NANOG mailing list submissions to > nanog(a)nanog.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > nanog-request(a)nanog.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > nanog-owner(a)nanog.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. RE: SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP > feed (Tim Burke) > 2. OARC 42 - Call for Contributions (co-located with NANOG 90) > (John Todd) > 3. Re: SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP > feed (Christopher Munz-Michielin) > 4. Contact for Hulu (Brad Bendy) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:58:11 +0000 > From: Tim Burke <tim(a)mid.net> > To: Tony Wicks <tony(a)wicks.co.nz>, 'Daniel Corbe' <daniel(a)corbe.net>, > "nanog(a)nanog.org" <nanog(a)nanog.org> > Subject: RE: SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP > feed > Message-ID: > < > PH7P221MB09647C6E57CBE701CF45B6A3BBC2A(a)PH7P221MB0964.NAMP221.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Unfortunately, Racknerd provides a majority of their services using a > dedicated server hosting company (Colo Crossing) that is known for > harboring spam and other malicious activity, so their IP space is generally > either blacklisted, of very poor reputation, or in many cases, completely > dropped at firewalls. Case in point, your message that originated from one > of these IPs tripped up my workstation's local spam filtering plugin from > ESET. > > V/r > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+tim=mid.net(a)nanog.org> On Behalf Of Tony Wicks > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 1:39 PM > To: 'Daniel Corbe' <daniel(a)corbe.net>; nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: [SPAM] RE: SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP > feed > > I can't speak to the bgp feed as this seems like unnecessary complication > to me, but I use https://www.racknerd.com/ for personal email/web hosting > KVM VM's and have found them to be excellent. They have yearly black Friday > specials (last years - https://www.racknerd.com/BlackFriday/ ) that are > very attractive. They don't block any ports on their US/Europe VM's. I use > a primary pair in one city and rsync everything to a backup pair in another > city (as well as home just to make sure). Not all cities can get V6 but > most do. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+tony=wicks.co.nz(a)nanog.org> On Behalf Of > Daniel Corbe > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 11:09 PM > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP feed > > Hey all, > > I apologize if this isn't the right place to post this; however, I thought > maybe the NANOG community would be able to point me in the right direction. > > I'm looking for a place that I can host a mailer. My primary use case is > a Mailman-style technical discussion list; much like NANOG but software > related instead of network related: READ: non-commercial in nature. > > I'm currently a vultr customer, but they're refusing to unblock port 25 on > my account. I've tried explaining my use case but no matter who I talk to > over there they just keep pointing me to their spam policy. > > Thanks! > -Daniel > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 07:51:01 -0700 > From: John Todd <jtodd(a)quad9.net> > To: list <nanog(a)nanog.org> > Subject: OARC 42 - Call for Contributions (co-located with NANOG 90) > Message-ID: <176AEAE1-D6DA-46A9-9EAB-CF0E250550CC(a)quad9.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" > > OARC 42 will be a two-day hybrid meeting and the dates are 8th and 9th > February to be co-located with NANOG 90 in Charlotte, North Carolina, > USA. > > The Programme Committee is seeking contributions from the community. > > All DNS-related subjects and suggestions for discussion topics are > welcome. For inspiration, we provide a non-exhaustive list of ideas: > Operations: Any operational gotchas, lessons learned from an outage, > details/reasons for a recent outage (how to improve TTR, tooling). > Deployment: DNS config management and release process. > Monitoring: Log ingestion pipeline, analytics infrastructure, anomaly > detection. > Scaling: DNS performance management and metrics. Increasing DNS Server > Efficiency > Security/Privacy: DNSSEC signing and validation, key storage, rollovers, > qname minimization, DoH/DoT > > The presentations can be either 10 or 20 minutes in length (plus 5 > minutes for Q&A). Proposals for in-person lightning presentations will > be opened closer to the Workshop dates. > > Workshop Milestones: > > 2023-09-07 Submissions open via Indico > 2023-11-22 Deadline for submission (23:59 UTC) > 2023-11-29 Preliminary list of contributions published > 2023-12-13 Full agenda published > 2024-01-10 Deadline for slideset submission and Rehearsal > 2024-02-08 OARC 42 Workshop - Day1 > 2024-02-09 OARC 42 Workshop - Day2 > > The Registration page and details for presentation submission are > published at: > <https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc42> > > To allow the Programme Committee to make objective assessments of > submissions, so as to ensure the quality of the workshop, submissions > SHOULD include slides. Draft slides are acceptable on submission. > Example guidelines for presentation slides: > https://www.grammarly.com/blog/presentation-tips/ > > Additional information for speakers of OARC 42 > - your talk will be broadcast live and recorded for future reference > - your presentation slides will be available for delegates and others > to download and refer to, before, during and after the meeting > - remote speakers have mandatory rehearsal (Date and Time TBD). It > would be very useful to have your slides (even if draft) ready for this > > Note: DNS-OARC provides registration fee waivers for the workshop to > support those who are part of underrepresented groups to speak at and/or > attend DNS-OARC. More details will be provided when registration opens. > > If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme > Committee: > https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme > via submissions(a)dns-oarc.net > > OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social > events. Please contact sponsor(a)dns-oarc.net if your organization is > interested in becoming a sponsor. > > (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a > position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.) > > John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee > > -- > John Todd - jtodd(a)quad9.net > General Manager - Quad9 Recursive Resolver > >

1 0

SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP feed
by Daniel Corbe 27 Sep '23

27 Sep '23

Hey all, I apologize if this isn't the right place to post this; however, I thought maybe the NANOG community would be able to point me in the right direction. I'm looking for a place that I can host a mailer. My primary use case is a Mailman-style technical discussion list; much like NANOG but software related instead of network related: READ: non-commercial in nature. I'm currently a vultr customer, but they're refusing to unblock port 25 on my account. I've tried explaining my use case but no matter who I talk to over there they just keep pointing me to their spam policy. Thanks! -Daniel

17 21

OARC 42 - Call for Contributions (co-located with NANOG 90)
by John Todd 27 Sep '23

27 Sep '23

OARC 42 will be a two-day hybrid meeting and the dates are 8th and 9th February to be co-located with NANOG 90 in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. The Programme Committee is seeking contributions from the community. All DNS-related subjects and suggestions for discussion topics are welcome. For inspiration, we provide a non-exhaustive list of ideas: Operations: Any operational gotchas, lessons learned from an outage, details/reasons for a recent outage (how to improve TTR, tooling). Deployment: DNS config management and release process. Monitoring: Log ingestion pipeline, analytics infrastructure, anomaly detection. Scaling: DNS performance management and metrics. Increasing DNS Server Efficiency Security/Privacy: DNSSEC signing and validation, key storage, rollovers, qname minimization, DoH/DoT The presentations can be either 10 or 20 minutes in length (plus 5 minutes for Q&A). Proposals for in-person lightning presentations will be opened closer to the Workshop dates. Workshop Milestones: 2023-09-07 Submissions open via Indico 2023-11-22 Deadline for submission (23:59 UTC) 2023-11-29 Preliminary list of contributions published 2023-12-13 Full agenda published 2024-01-10 Deadline for slideset submission and Rehearsal 2024-02-08 OARC 42 Workshop - Day1 2024-02-09 OARC 42 Workshop - Day2 The Registration page and details for presentation submission are published at: <https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc42> To allow the Programme Committee to make objective assessments of submissions, so as to ensure the quality of the workshop, submissions SHOULD include slides. Draft slides are acceptable on submission. Example guidelines for presentation slides: https://www.grammarly.com/blog/presentation-tips/ Additional information for speakers of OARC 42 - your talk will be broadcast live and recorded for future reference - your presentation slides will be available for delegates and others to download and refer to, before, during and after the meeting - remote speakers have mandatory rehearsal (Date and Time TBD). It would be very useful to have your slides (even if draft) ready for this Note: DNS-OARC provides registration fee waivers for the workshop to support those who are part of underrepresented groups to speak at and/or attend DNS-OARC. More details will be provided when registration opens. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissions(a)dns-oarc.net OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact sponsor(a)dns-oarc.net if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.) John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee -- John Todd - jtodd(a)quad9.net General Manager - Quad9 Recursive Resolver

1 0

Paramount+ anyone here? Please contact off list
by Norman Jester 26 Sep '23

26 Sep '23

Looking for some connectivity help with routing, a unique problem. Please contact me off-list. Norman Jester 619-319-7055 (I prefer WhatsApp or Text if you do too.)

1 0

NANOG 89 Agenda is LIVE! + "Network Automation Could Save Your Life" + More
by Nanog News 26 Sep '23

26 Sep '23

*NANOG 89 Agenda is LIVE! * *Sync Your Calendars Now + Never Miss a Talk! * *Have you registered yet for NANOG 89?* Check out the full agenda with talk date/time, abstract, + speaker info to create your personal NANOG 89 schedule. *VIEW AGENDA * <https://nanog.org/events/nanog-89/nanog-89-agenda/> *Guest Columnist: Scott Robohn* *"Network Automation Could Save Your Life — Maybe Not Your Life, but Probably Your Career"* *Network Automation* is receiving a much-needed boost in attention, partly due to the efforts of NANOG, the Network Automation Forum (NAF), and other organizations. Why this boost? Network Automation is moving slower than we thought it should and perhaps slower than we need it to move. *READ MORE <https://nanog.org/stories/articles/network-automation-could-save-your-life/>* *Video of the Week* *NANOG 87 Recap * NANOG 89 is less than three short weeks away! Get into the NANOG spirit + take a trip down memory lane. Watch the NANOG 87 recap video now — meeting location: Atlanta. *WATCH NOW <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fejIBHzKU14&t=53s>* *Attend NANOG Virtually!* *Can't make it to our next meeting in San Diego? Join us virtually!* Stream live presentations, participate in real-time chat forums, enjoy 360 views of General Session + more. *REGISTER NOW! * <https://nanog.org/events/nanog-89/>

1 0

Latest NETSCOUT DDoS Threat Intelligence Report published, no registration required.
by Dobbins, Roland 26 Sep '23

26 Sep '23

This issue covers 1H2023, and the full report is available online: <https://www.netscout.com/threatreport> We make these findings freely available as a service to the operational community; feedback welcome. Again, no registration is required to view the full report online. A .pdf summary is available for download; registration is required to download the .pdf. [Full disclosure: I am employed by NETSCOUT and am a contributor to this report.] -------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins(a)netscout.com<mailto:roland.dobbins@netscout.com>>

1 0

Comcast contact sought
by Al Whaley 25 Sep '23

25 Sep '23

I am looking for a senior contact at Comcast. I have been trying to assist someone with a business connection that runs a server farm. Recently the business cable modem started to short-stop port 53 for UDP and TCP. Apparently, a transparent DNS proxy somehow got activated and all outbound traffic to any IPv4 or IPv6 address is intercepted and handled by the modem – or not handled. Sadly, the proxy is stupid and a) ignores the intended destination address, and b) drops things it doesn’t know about, including any AXFR / IXFR and other more esoteric traffic, normal for DNS server installations, but not used by the public. The DNS servers are not able to do work, e.g. act as secondaries. I know others in the same configuration with servers that have been lucky and not had this ‘feature’ activated, but I have found several references on forums where people have been caught by this and unsuccessful in reaching anyone in management, so it is a known problem. Comcast doesn’t allow customer supplied DOCSIS modems with multiple fixed IPs. Other avenues exhausted as well. I’m hoping someone at Comcast can disable this. Attempts to go through customer service… well we all know where that ends up. Escalations just don’t go to anyone technical or interested. regards Al Whaley Sunnyside Computing, Inc.

5 4

TACACS+ server recommendations?
by Bryan Holloway 24 Sep '23

24 Sep '23

Ah, the good old days when I could download the latest tac_plus code from the Cisco FTP site, compile it, and off I go. But I digress. Curious if there are any operators out there that have a good recommendation on a lightweight TACACS+ server for ~200 NEs and access-control for 20-30 folks. Nothing too special, but some sort of simple command-control auth would be nice. Open-source is fine ... we've been looking at commercial options, but they're all pretty pricey and have way more features than we need. Thank you all in advance! - bryan

15 20

Formula1 / F1TV Contact
by Jason Canady 23 Sep '23

23 Sep '23

Does anyone here work at Formula1 / F1TV or have a contact? They are blocking our network and we need to get this resolved. Thank you! Best Regards, Jason Canady Unlimited Net / AS11990

1 0

FW: softlayer.com
by Travis Garrison 23 Sep '23

23 Sep '23

Traceroute from here if it helps Tracing route to 138-43-128-1.reserved.highland.net [138.43.128.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] 3 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] 4 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] 5 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms v313.core1.mci3.he.net [216.218.213.141] 6 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms 100ge10-2.core1.dal1.he.net [184.105.81.206] 7 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms xo-as15-as2828.10gigabitethernet6-7.core1.dal1.he.net [184.105.255.78] 8 40 ms 39 ms 40 ms 207.88.14.198.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.198] 9 40 ms 39 ms 40 ms 207.88.12.178.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.12.178] 10 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms 216.156.16.239.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.16.239] 11 48 ms 48 ms 48 ms ip65-46-198-198.z198-46-65.customer.algx.net [65.46.198.198] 12 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms occm-6.dhcp.grp1-rng1.tncsvl.blomand.net.57.131.192.in-addr.arpa [192.131.57.6] 13 * * * Request timed out. Thanks Travis From: NANOG <nanog-bounces(a)nanog.org<mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org>> On Behalf Of Siyuan Miao Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 9:22 AM To: Nikolas Geyer <nik(a)neko.id.au<mailto:nik@neko.id.au>> Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: softlayer.com Perhaps it won't work because their customer support will ask you for bi-directional traceroute and refused to forward to backbone team. Then they'll say it's not their fault and you can see the packet is dropped outside our network. Here's a sample traceroute from SoftLayer Washington, San Jose and Seattle in case someone needs it: aveline@iad02-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide Start: Fri Mar 22 17:20:42 2019 HOST: iad02-sl01 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- [REDACTED] 0.0% 10 1.4 1.5 0.8 3.7 1.0 2.|-- ae13.dar02.wdc01.networklayer.com<http://ae13.dar02.wdc01.networklayer.com> 0.0% 10 0.5 3.3 0.4 28.6 8.8 3.|-- ae9.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com<http://ae9.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com> 0.0% 10 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.0 4.|-- eqix-dc5.intellifiber.com<http://eqix-dc5.intellifiber.com> 0.0% 10 0.8 1.2 0.8 2.2 0.3 5.|-- ae13-0.cr02.asbn01-va.us.windstream.net<http://ae13-0.cr02.asbn01-va.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.0 6.|-- ae11-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net<http://ae11-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 15.6 16.1 15.6 17.4 0.5 7.|-- ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net<http://ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 17.4 16.1 15.9 17.4 0.3 8.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net<http://h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 24.7 24.8 24.6 24.9 0.0 9.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net<http://east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net> 0.0% 10 22.6 22.8 22.5 23.8 0.0 10.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 aveline@sjc03-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide Start: Fri Mar 22 16:21:04 2019 HOST: sjc03-sl01 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- [REDACTED] 0.0% 10 2.4 2.0 0.3 14.3 4.3 2.|-- ae0.dar02.sjc01.networklayer.com<http://ae0.dar02.sjc01.networklayer.com> 0.0% 10 1.0 0.5 0.3 1.3 0.0 3.|-- ae9.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com<http://ae9.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com> 0.0% 10 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.0 4.|-- eqix-sv1.windstream.com<http://eqix-sv1.windstream.com> 0.0% 10 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.0 5.|-- ae6-0.cr02.lsaj01-ca.us.windstream.net<http://ae6-0.cr02.lsaj01-ca.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 11.6 11.5 11.5 11.6 0.0 6.|-- ae-11-0.cr01.dlls01-tx.us.windstream.net<http://ae-11-0.cr01.dlls01-tx.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 42.6 42.7 42.5 43.4 0.0 7.|-- ae7-0.cr02.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net<http://ae7-0.cr02.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 64.0 65.6 63.9 74.2 3.4 8.|-- ae1-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net<http://ae1-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 62.3 62.7 62.2 66.9 1.5 9.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net<http://h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 71.9 72.0 71.9 72.2 0.0 10.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net<http://east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net> 0.0% 10 69.9 68.8 68.6 69.9 0.3 11.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 aveline@sea04-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide Start: Fri Mar 22 08:19:09 2019 HOST: sea04-sl01 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- [REDACTED] 0.0% 10 0.7 1.2 0.7 1.8 0.0 2.|-- ae12.dar02.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com<http://ae12.dar02.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com> 0.0% 10 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.3 0.0 3.|-- ae9.bbr01.wb01.sea02.networklayer.com<http://ae9.bbr01.wb01.sea02.networklayer.com> 0.0% 10 1.2 1.0 0.7 1.5 0.0 4.|-- six.seattle-wa.us.windstream.net<http://six.seattle-wa.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 1.5 1.0 0.7 1.7 0.0 5.|-- ae12-0.cr01.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net<http://ae12-0.cr01.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 41.1 41.2 41.0 41.6 0.0 6.|-- ae17-0.cr02.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net<http://ae17-0.cr02.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 41.1 41.4 41.1 42.0 0.0 7.|-- ae10-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net<http://ae10-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 63.8 64.4 63.5 71.1 2.3 8.|-- ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net<http://ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 63.7 63.7 63.5 64.0 0.0 9.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net<http://h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net> 0.0% 10 71.6 71.8 71.5 72.8 0.0 10.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net<http://east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net> 0.0% 10 71.8 70.8 70.2 71.8 0.3 11.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Regards, Siyuan Miao On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:10 PM Nikolas Geyer <nik(a)neko.id.au<mailto:nik@neko.id.au>> wrote: This is the best approach. Have run into this problem a few times and had zero success getting the filters removed without having SL customers log tickets with support. Verbiage needs to be “this prefix is blocked, please escalate to your backbone team”. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <lists(a)packetflux.com<mailto:lists@packetflux.com>> wrote: Another idea... Have you tried reaching out to some of the blocked sites? They likely have better contact information than is available publicly, especially a larger one like indeed. On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 3:41 PM John Alcock <john(a)alcock.org<mailto:john@alcock.org>> wrote: Still looking for anyone from softlayer.com<http://softlayer.com> It has been a challenge. Anything hosted by softlayer.com<http://softlayer.com> is being blocked. Here is a small list so far windowbook.tpondemand.com<http://windowbook.tpondemand.com> ahainstructornetwork.americanheart.org<http://ahainstructornetwork.americanheart.org> clover.com<http://clover.com> Cebroker.com<http://Cebroker.com> Softlayer.com<http://Softlayer.com> indeed.com<http://indeed.com> & Enforce Staffing It is growing every day. John On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:35 PM John Alcock <john(a)alcock.org<mailto:john@alcock.org>> wrote: Afternoon, Thought I would start a new thread. After researching, traceroutes, etc, I think I found my problem. 9 out of the 10 sites that subscribers on my new block is being hosted by softlayer. Anyone on the list have contacts with softlayer. Right now I have an email to abuse. The support line will not help me out. John

3 2