- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Survey on Middlebox modeling and troubleshooting
by Zhang, Ying 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

Dear All, We are researchers in HP Labs and Duke university. We are currently working on a project related to Middlebox modeling and troubleshooting. We are currently conducting a survey and gathering feedback from operators. Can you help us by providing some answers? Please feel free to email us if you have any additional suggestions. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5SFP6G8 Thanks! -Ying

5 5

VPLS Providers
by Chris Burwell 06 Jan '16

06 Jan '16

Hi NANOG, I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for connectivity among about ten sites in North America, however feedback for providers that also extend service to EMEA and APAC would also be welcome. All types of feedback are appreciated (good, bad, and anything in between). Thanks, - Chris

8 9

IPv4 subnets for lease?
by Nick Ellermann 06 Jan '16

06 Jan '16

We have customers asking to lease IP space for BGP transit with us and other peers. But they are struggling to get at a minimum even a Class C, even though they have their own ASN. We don't have large amounts of free IPv4 space to lease out to a single customer in most cases anymore. Hope to at least introduce these customers to some contacts that may be able to help. Do we know of any reputable sources that are leasing or selling IPv4 subnets as small as a /24 to satisfy their diversity needs? Thanks! Sincerely, Nick Ellermann - CTO & VP Cloud Services BroadAspect E: nellermann(a)broadaspect.com<mailto:nellermann@broadaspect.com> P: 703-297-4639 F: 703-996-4443 THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.

8 7

Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
by Tomas Podermanski 06 Jan '16

06 Jan '16

Hi, It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first time when native IPv6 on google statistics (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-) T.

87 261

Re: TransPacific Partnership
by tglassey＠earthlink.net 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

I wouldn't worry about it every byte if the surveillance data is tied to the patent fraud around Us6370629 imho. Sent from my HTC ----- Reply message ----- From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhoppes(a)indigowireless.com> To: "Tom Berryman" <Tom(a)connectivityit.com.au> Cc: <nanog(a)nanog.org> Subject: TransPacific Partnership Date: Sun, Jan 3, 2016 16:07 My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs would have to provide real time monitoring of data Not as part of CALEA but as part of NSA surveilance. > On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <Tom(a)connectivityit.com.au> wrote: > > G'Day Matt, > > I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of the TPP. > > What do you mean by burned? > As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing business with operators in TPP participating countries? > > Also, will you be attending PTC? > > > Regards, > Tom Berryman > > > Tom Berryman | CTO > Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD > ABN: 41128650635 > > 1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | tom(a)connectivityit.com.au | AS-58511 > www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | twitter.com/connectivityit > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes > Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: TransPacific Partnership > > Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?

1 0

Possible Level3 Latency and Packet Loss
by Eric Rogers 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

I have several customers that have contacted us about VoIP quality, and I have moved BGP away from Level3, and even through Cogent and/or HE to try and bypass but it still goes back into Level3's network. Is there any way I can get an engineer from Level3 to contact me to help troubleshoot this? The NOC will not talk with me as I am not a Customer of Record. Eric Rogers www.pdsconnect.me (317) 831-3000 x200

1 0

Netflix stuffing data on pipe
by Matt Hoppes 04 Jan '16

04 Jan '16

Has anyone else observed Netflix sessions attempting to come into customer CPE devices at well in excess of the customers throttled plan? I'm not talking error retries on the line. I'm talking like two to three times in excess of what the customers CPE device can handle. I'm observing massive buffer overruns in some of our switches that appear to be directly related to this. And I can't figure out what possible good purpose Netflix would have for attempting to do this. Curious if anyone else has seen it?

12 16

Re: TransPacific Partnership
by Matt Hoppes 04 Jan '16

04 Jan '16

My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs would have to provide real time monitoring of data Not as part of CALEA but as part of NSA surveilance. > On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <Tom(a)connectivityit.com.au> wrote: > > G'Day Matt, > > I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of the TPP. > > What do you mean by burned? > As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing business with operators in TPP participating countries? > > Also, will you be attending PTC? > > > Regards, > Tom Berryman > > > Tom Berryman | CTO > Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD > ABN: 41128650635 > > 1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | tom(a)connectivityit.com.au | AS-58511 > www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | twitter.com/connectivityit > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes > Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: TransPacific Partnership > > Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?

1 0

TransPacific Partnership
by Matt Hoppes 03 Jan '16

03 Jan '16

Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?

1 0

Level 3 contact
by Andrew Dampf 02 Jan '16

02 Jan '16

Would an engineer from Level 3 please contact me off list? Thank you.

1 0