- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: Why the US Government has so many data centers
by Scott Weeks 14 Mar '16

14 Mar '16

--- sean(a)donelan.com wrote: From: Sean Donelan <sean(a)donelan.com> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Scott Weeks wrote: > It's all phunny money. Real economics are not even > considered. At all. : And what makes your think the Data Center Optimization : Initiative is any different, when they are counting : single servers instead of data centers? I don't think it's different. It's more of the same insanity. : If it was a rational, coherent plan; that would be great : Instead I see lots of people spending years looking for : servers, and writing reports about counting servers, and : moving servers from on room to another room. That's the world of top-heavy management. Not just in the gov't, but in many orgs. It's just worse in the gov't due to the sheer size of the workforce there. It's not rational and there're just too many middle management people fighting for their own increase in scope of authority for coherency. : What's the return on investment counting paperclips? This is the phunny money comment. In the real world we deal with real ROI or the business fails. In their world, there is no such thing. : Declare victory now. They did that a long time ago in other areas. Apparently, this is just the next one... ;-) scott

1 0

AT&T E-mail Admin
by Mike Hammett 14 Mar '16

14 Mar '16

Could someone forward me over to someone in AT&T's e-mail department? I've got an IP that's seemingly mistakenly on their RBL. It isn't on any blacklists listed at MXToolbox and the logs don't show any recent SPAM like activity. I filled out their form, but no response yet and I suspect they won't take too kindly to my "There's nothing wrong." response in it. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com

1 0

HP HSR Routers
by Colton Conor 14 Mar '16

14 Mar '16

Does anyone deploy HP HSR routers for full BGP routing? Looks like they have couple of routers that can hold 4 Million IPv4 routes, and do full BGP routing. I did no even know that HP had routers of this size. I read this post on Reddit, and it said the following: I would suggest looking at the HP routing line, in North America for some reason people over look them (HP's ability to get the message out is not stellar). The HSR 6602-XG will push 15 Mpps with routing table sizes of 4mil (ipv4) and 2mil (ipv6) there is no additional licensing for any feature you want to use. With respect to implementation I have always felt if you understand the protocol who gives a damn about the syntax... The MSR 4060 will handle 36 Mpps with table sizes of 1mil (ipv4) and 1mil (ipv6). Either solution will be cost effective. The person I heard about HP from manages a direct peer as a transit AS to hurricane electric with dual 10G Ethernet with a HSR 6800 (420Mpps) the throughput and feature set on their product is unreal. In a municipality's network for peering I purchased an ASR for the main site prior to learning about the MSR/HSR line and just put in a 4060 for the secondary and tertiary site they work like a charm. I think the total cost per 4060 with redundant MPU's / Power Supplies / 4 port Gig T HIMM card and 5years of support was like $15k (CDN) so like $25 USD... and not only do they go toe to toe with the QFP in the ASR for performance but I can terminate ipsec tunnels without shelling out an addition $20k!! or I can redistribute into MPBGP from my IGP without shelling out an additional 20K for the IP Enterprise liscense!! :D I would at least check em' out. Oh last thing the routers support IRF which is the HP spin on RSMLT for fabric creation (think VSS without the arbitrary limitations on which line cards will be a/a or a/p (looking at you FWSM and IDSM) so you can effectively have millisecond convergence across the routers... Also Comware is modular so the OS is identical across all products, which is kind of nice because with an ASR you have crap like VASI groups which only exist in the ASR so ya that was fun.... https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/347e74/costefficient_peering_r…

3 4

IETF RFC 7707: Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks
by Fernando Gont 13 Mar '16

13 Mar '16

Folks, Tim Chown and me have published RFC7707 on "Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks". The RFC is available at: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7707.txt>. You can find some context for this RFC here: <http://blog.si6networks.com/2016/03/the-ietf-has-just-published-rfc-7707_12…> Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont(a)si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

1 0

SFP Cost Variation
by Nicholas Warren 12 Mar '16

12 Mar '16

Quick question for the experts. Why when looking at SFPs, some sites list them as $800 when the same part number can be found on places like amazon for $30-$40. What is the difference in them? Why would I buy them from a place like CDW with what appears to be a 2,000% markup. https://www.cdw.com/shop/products/Brocade-SFP-mini-GBIC-transceiver-module-G igabit-Ethernet/1411743.aspx http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0076Q1CTY Thanks, Nich

6 5

Re: Why the US Government has so many data centers
by Scott Weeks 11 Mar '16

11 Mar '16

On 2016-03-11 04:40 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Sean Donelan > > The U.S. government definition of data center is a bit like defining > a warehouse as any room containing a single ream of paper. Yes, > warehouses are used to store reams of paper; but that doesn't make > every place containing a ream of paper a warehouse. > ---------------------------------------- > > --- Steve.Mikulasik(a)civeo.com wrote: > > This is a great way to create a mess of rules. Need a server > for running an app locally to a site? You need XYZ standards > that make no sense for your deploy and increase the cost by > 10 times. > > Our server guys always try to set standards, then they run > into a deploy where the needs are simple, but the standards > make it significantly uneconomical. > --------------------------------------------- > > > Been there, done that, got many t-shirts. There is no thought > at all to economics. None. People that have absolutely no > experience in networking or computers (read: can barely operate > M$ computers) make these rules/definitions/processes. It's not > even sausage when they're done. It's post-digested sausage. > For example, read about the OPM fiasco: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Personnel_Management_data_breach > > I'm one of those 21.5 million people. Fingerprints, SSN, > address, etc, etc, etc. ------------------------------------------------ --- alter3d(a)alter3d.ca wrote:------------------ From: Peter Kristolaitis <alter3d(a)alter3d.ca> I disagree. Government departments are heavily concerned about economics. Specifically, "how can we maintain, or preferably increase, our budget in the next fiscal cycle?" If that means feeding 500 lbs of pork to a chihuahua so you can burn up this year's budget, then so be it. Next year you can ask for extra money to put the chihuahua on a special, extremely expensive diet while simultaneously asking for more pork to enrich its diet. ------------------------------------------ Ok, put that way you're correct. It's really disgusting to watch the waste knowing how hard I work for my money and how badly it's pissed into the wind. scott

1 0

RE: Why the US Government has so many data centers
by Scott Weeks 11 Mar '16

11 Mar '16

-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Sean Donelan The U.S. government definition of data center is a bit like defining a warehouse as any room containing a single ream of paper. Yes, warehouses are used to store reams of paper; but that doesn't make every place containing a ream of paper a warehouse. ---------------------------------------- --- Steve.Mikulasik(a)civeo.com wrote: This is a great way to create a mess of rules. Need a server for running an app locally to a site? You need XYZ standards that make no sense for your deploy and increase the cost by 10 times. Our server guys always try to set standards, then they run into a deploy where the needs are simple, but the standards make it significantly uneconomical. --------------------------------------------- Been there, done that, got many t-shirts. There is no thought at all to economics. None. People that have absolutely no experience in networking or computers (read: can barely operate M$ computers) make these rules/definitions/processes. It's not even sausage when they're done. It's post-digested sausage. For example, read about the OPM fiasco: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Personnel_Management_data_breach I'm one of those 21.5 million people. Fingerprints, SSN, address, etc, etc, etc. scott

2 1

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Analysis Role Account 11 Mar '16

11 Mar '16

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, PaNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfsinoz(a)gmail.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 12 Mar, 2016 Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 586718 Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS): 215597 Deaggregation factor: 2.72 Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets): 285921 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 53056 Prefixes per ASN: 11.06 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 36592 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 15789 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 6412 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 167 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.4 Max AS path length visible: 39 Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 40285) 34 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 1062 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 367 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 13030 Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 10052 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 39223 Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 15 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 345 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2808944324 Equivalent to 167 /8s, 109 /16s and 22 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 75.9 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 75.9 Percentage of available address space allocated: 100.0 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 98.0 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 192220 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 150355 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 41706 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 3.61 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 160207 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 64684 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 5153 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 31.09 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 1192 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 905 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 39 Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 1931 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 753310980 Equivalent to 44 /8s, 230 /16s and 157 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 88.0 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319, 58368-59391, 63488-64098, 131072-135580 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 36/8, 39/8, 42/8, 43/8, 49/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 101/8, 103/8, 106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8, 163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 179827 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 88882 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.02 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 184828 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 87774 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 16409 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 11.26 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 5890 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1699 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.8 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 37 Number of ARIN region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 1069 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 1102423104 Equivalent to 65 /8s, 181 /16s and 164 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 58.3 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959, 46080-47103 53248-55295, 62464-63487, 64198-64296, 393216-395164 ARIN Address Blocks 3/8, 4/8, 6/8, 7/8, 8/8, 9/8, 11/8, 12/8, 13/8, 15/8, 16/8, 17/8, 18/8, 19/8, 20/8, 21/8, 22/8, 23/8, 24/8, 26/8, 28/8, 29/8, 30/8, 32/8, 33/8, 34/8, 35/8, 38/8, 40/8, 44/8, 45/8, 47/8, 48/8, 50/8, 52/8, 53/8, 54/8, 55/8, 56/8, 57/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, 66/8, 67/8, 68/8, 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, 72/8, 73/8, 74/8, 75/8, 76/8, 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, 99/8, 100/8, 104/8, 107/8, 108/8, 128/8, 129/8, 130/8, 131/8, 132/8, 134/8, 135/8, 136/8, 137/8, 138/8, 139/8, 140/8, 142/8, 143/8, 144/8, 146/8, 147/8, 148/8, 149/8, 152/8, 155/8, 156/8, 157/8, 158/8, 159/8, 160/8, 161/8, 162/8, 164/8, 165/8, 166/8, 167/8, 168/8, 169/8, 170/8, 172/8, 173/8, 174/8, 184/8, 192/8, 198/8, 199/8, 204/8, 205/8, 206/8, 207/8, 208/8, 209/8, 214/8, 215/8, 216/8, RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 141090 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 69682 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 2.02 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 149636 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 92320 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18052 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 8.29 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 7939 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3012 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.8 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 30 Number of RIPE region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 4538 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 703641472 Equivalent to 41 /8s, 240 /16s and 183 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 102.3 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055, 47104-52223, 56320-58367 59392-61439, 61952-62463, 196608-204287 RIPE Address Blocks 2/8, 5/8, 25/8, 31/8, 37/8, 46/8, 51/8, 62/8, 77/8, 78/8, 79/8, 80/8, 81/8, 82/8, 83/8, 84/8, 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8, 89/8, 90/8, 91/8, 92/8, 93/8, 94/8, 95/8, 109/8, 141/8, 145/8, 151/8, 176/8, 178/8, 185/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/8, 195/8, 212/8, 213/8, 217/8, LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 61670 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 12115 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 5.09 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 75505 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 35198 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2458 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 30.72 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 578 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 556 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.7 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 21 Number of LACNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 2324 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 171050752 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 50 /16s and 7 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 102.0 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, 52224-53247, 61440-61951, 64099-64197, 262144-265628 + ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 177/8, 179/8, 181/8, 186/8, 187/8, 189/8, 190/8, 191/8, 200/8, 201/8, AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 14441 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 3171 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.55 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 16197 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 5641 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 739 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 21.92 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 190 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 167 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.6 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 18 Number of AfriNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 190 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 78155264 Equivalent to 4 /8s, 168 /16s and 142 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 77.6 AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887, 327680-328703 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 102/8, 105/8, 154/8, 196/8, 197/8, APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4538 5590 4192 76 China Education and Research 4766 3144 11142 1115 Korea Telecom 7545 3089 351 184 TPG Telecom Limited 17974 2903 914 96 PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 9829 2390 1449 427 National Internet Backbone 4755 2096 432 245 TATA Communications formerly 9808 1855 8717 30 Guangdong Mobile Communicatio 45899 1692 1094 170 VNNIC 4808 1641 2287 522 CNCGROUP IP network China169 4788 1520 645 64 TM Net, Internet Service Prov Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-APNIC ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 22773 3343 2948 143 Cox Communications Inc. 6389 2394 3687 42 BellSouth.net Inc. 18566 2211 394 276 MegaPath Corporation 20115 1914 1921 401 Charter Communications 30036 1730 342 253 Mediacom Communications Corp 6983 1690 849 232 EarthLink, Inc. 4323 1585 1004 392 tw telecom holdings, inc. 209 1502 4483 1212 Qwest Communications Company, 701 1391 11453 660 MCI Communications Services, 11492 1259 234 594 CABLE ONE, INC. Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-ARIN RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 39891 2515 135 9 SaudiNet, Saudi Telecom Compa 20940 2404 925 1729 Akamai International B.V. 34984 1952 322 414 TELLCOM ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A 8551 1230 376 54 Bezeq International-Ltd 6849 1179 355 21 JSC "Ukrtelecom" 12479 1144 980 86 France Telecom Espana SA 8402 1125 544 15 OJSC "Vimpelcom" 13188 1077 98 78 TOV "Bank-Inform" 31148 1041 47 41 Freenet Ltd. 9198 949 352 25 JSC Kazakhtelecom Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-RIPE LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 10620 3447 542 122 Telmex Colombia S.A. 8151 2221 3412 551 Uninet S.A. de C.V. 7303 1521 941 238 Telecom Argentina S.A. 11830 1442 366 25 Instituto Costarricense de El 6503 1432 453 56 Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V. 6147 1036 377 27 Telefonica del Peru S.A.A. 3816 994 478 185 COLOMBIA TELECOMUNICACIONES S 7738 994 1882 41 Telemar Norte Leste S.A. 26615 994 2325 34 Tim Celular S.A. 28573 991 2172 159 NET Serviços de Comunicação S Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-LACNIC AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 24863 1201 402 35 Link Egypt (Link.NET) 8452 1008 1472 15 TE-AS 37611 633 48 2 Afrihost-Brevis Computer Serv 36903 584 294 104 Office National des Postes et 36992 505 1357 25 ETISALAT MISR 37492 377 217 64 Orange Tunisie 24835 338 146 12 Vodafone Data 29571 267 21 12 Cote d'Ivoire Telecom 2018 250 327 74 TENET (The UNINET Project) 36947 231 807 13 Telecom Algeria Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-AFRINIC Global Per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4538 5590 4192 76 China Education and Research 10620 3447 542 122 Telmex Colombia S.A. 22773 3343 2948 143 Cox Communications Inc. 4766 3144 11142 1115 Korea Telecom 7545 3089 351 184 TPG Telecom Limited 17974 2903 914 96 PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 39891 2515 135 9 SaudiNet, Saudi Telecom Compa 20940 2404 925 1729 Akamai International B.V. 6389 2394 3687 42 BellSouth.net Inc. 9829 2390 1449 427 National Internet Backbone Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 10620 3447 3325 Telmex Colombia S.A. 22773 3343 3200 Cox Communications Inc. 7545 3089 2905 TPG Telecom Limited 17974 2903 2807 PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 39891 2515 2506 SaudiNet, Saudi Telecom Compa 6389 2394 2352 BellSouth.net Inc. 4766 3144 2029 Korea Telecom 9829 2390 1963 National Internet Backbone 18566 2211 1935 MegaPath Corporation 4755 2096 1851 TATA Communications formerly Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-CIDRnet List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 65001 PRIVATE 5.143.176.0/20 15468 OJSC Rostelecom 30662 UNALLOCATED 8.2.129.0/24 3356 Level 3 Communicatio 53506 UNALLOCATED 8.17.102.0/23 3356 Level 3 Communicatio 46467 UNALLOCATED 8.19.192.0/24 46887 Lightower Fiber Netw 16589 UNALLOCATED 8.20.247.0/24 35838 CCANET Limited 16589 UNALLOCATED 8.26.56.0/24 35838 CCANET Limited 46473 UNALLOCATED 8.27.122.0/24 3356 Level 3 Communicatio 46473 UNALLOCATED 8.27.124.0/24 3356 Level 3 Communicatio 27205 UNALLOCATED 8.38.16.0/21 3356 Level 3 Communicatio 15347 UNALLOCATED 8.224.147.0/24 12064 Cox Communications I Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-badAS Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 23.226.112.0/20 62788 >>UNKNOWN<< 23.249.144.0/20 40430 colo4jax, LLC 27.100.7.0/24 56096 >>UNKNOWN<< 37.46.10.0/23 36351 SoftLayer Technologies Inc. 37.46.14.0/24 36351 SoftLayer Technologies Inc. 37.46.15.0/24 36351 SoftLayer Technologies Inc. 41.73.1.0/24 37004 >>UNKNOWN<< 41.73.2.0/24 37004 >>UNKNOWN<< 41.73.3.0/24 37004 >>UNKNOWN<< 41.73.4.0/24 37004 >>UNKNOWN<< Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-add-IANA Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:16 /9:13 /10:36 /11:101 /12:267 /13:517 /14:1030 /15:1763 /16:12978 /17:7575 /18:12702 /19:25792 /20:38135 /21:40194 /22:65126 /23:56317 /24:322554 /25:542 /26:585 /27:404 /28:19 /29:16 /30:13 /31:0 /32:23 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 22773 2527 3343 Cox Communications Inc. 39891 2472 2515 SaudiNet, Saudi Telecom Compa 18566 2113 2211 MegaPath Corporation 30036 1545 1730 Mediacom Communications Corp 6389 1521 2394 BellSouth.net Inc. 6983 1340 1690 EarthLink, Inc. 10620 1332 3447 Telmex Colombia S.A. 34984 1241 1952 TELLCOM ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A 11492 1169 1259 CABLE ONE, INC. 6849 997 1179 JSC "Ukrtelecom" Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-sXXas-nos Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 1:1640 2:737 4:20 5:2075 6:26 8:917 12:1774 13:38 14:1617 15:45 16:2 17:72 18:20 20:49 23:1407 24:1742 27:2259 31:1746 32:54 33:2 34:3 35:4 36:240 37:2339 38:1177 39:26 40:88 41:2956 42:385 43:1658 44:40 45:1706 46:2451 47:71 49:1116 50:836 51:8 52:83 54:197 55:3 56:6 57:44 58:1515 59:861 60:562 61:1796 62:1477 63:1927 64:4437 65:2165 66:4011 67:2107 68:1100 69:3263 70:1063 71:468 72:1971 74:2543 75:340 76:439 77:1373 78:1273 79:833 80:1314 81:1363 82:913 83:675 84:800 85:1586 86:466 87:1053 88:570 89:1943 90:167 91:6047 92:857 93:2296 94:2368 95:2307 96:459 97:352 98:959 99:45 100:70 101:1002 103:9873 104:2230 105:178 106:393 107:1146 108:656 109:2116 110:1263 111:1613 112:940 113:1279 114:1058 115:1692 116:1530 117:1383 118:2131 119:1565 120:513 121:1163 122:2224 123:2015 124:1613 125:1741 128:725 129:376 130:430 131:1257 132:605 133:171 134:448 135:122 136:353 137:332 138:1696 139:212 140:338 141:468 142:630 143:874 144:607 145:160 146:851 147:636 148:1467 149:482 150:659 151:827 152:604 153:270 154:555 155:902 156:489 157:444 158:347 159:1098 160:427 161:727 162:2293 163:531 164:727 165:1123 166:311 167:1075 168:1568 169:611 170:1571 171:267 172:493 173:1667 174:721 175:888 176:1515 177:4061 178:2237 179:1089 180:2084 181:1674 182:1953 183:672 184:809 185:5907 186:3018 187:2036 188:2101 189:1761 190:7682 191:1244 192:8906 193:5729 194:4370 195:3765 196:1648 197:1173 198:5497 199:5614 200:6845 201:3706 202:10121 203:9587 204:4627 205:2705 206:2968 207:3103 208:4063 209:3889 210:3945 211:2030 212:2668 213:2192 214:828 215:73 216:5748 217:1902 218:762 219:568 220:1653 221:856 222:675 223:930 End of report

1 0

Verizon Voice Engineering Contact?
by chris 11 Mar '16

11 Mar '16

Anyone from Verizon on the voice side on the list or if anyone has any good contacts they can share? We have customers in LATA 224 who cannot complete calls to a common carrier and are hearing an audible verizon message "we're sorry all circuits are busy now" Please contact offlist Thanks chris

1 0

Re: AW: Cogent - Google - HE Fun
by Mark Tinka 11 Mar '16

11 Mar '16

On 10/Mar/16 17:25, Jon Lewis wrote: > My guess is that GOOG is playing peering chicken with Cogent on "the > IPv6 Internet" because doing so is low impact. Doing this with v4 > routing would be far more painful to both GOOG and single-homed Cogent > customers (probably make the news and make one or both look bad). > Doing this with v6 keeps it off in the shadows...both parties know its > an issue, but its likely not seriously impacting anyone yet. GOOG > likely thinks they're big enough and their content desirable enough, > that Cogent should peer with them. Cogent clearly disagrees. I'm > sure GOOG would prefer SFI with Cogent for v4 and v6...but they're > working on getting v6 first. Assuming the IPv6 traffic is traversing the same physical ports as IPv4 between both networks, it is actually unnecessary pain to not pass IPv6 traffic across their interconnect relationship, unless removal of IPv6 peering lowers traffic utilization significantly to negate the need for Google to pay a higher rate to Cogent, and/or delay physical port speed upgrades. Mark.

1 0