- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

RE: ARIN
by Jeff Mohler 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

[Someone with a clue one said...*grin*] Hrmmmm, you have a major point. Suppose only routers costing 6 figures or more could do CIDR, while routers costing, say, four figures could do RIPv1? Should we give someone a large block to get "up and running" until they could afford the much more expensive routers? (stuff deleted) See, I just don't think "Address Space" should be a barrier to entry. It's not like ARIN *owns* the space, they're just the caretaker for the IPv4 space in America for the "community". As a member of the community, I want them to be fugal to avoid waste. But unusually large (and temporary) allocations to allow a company to enter the market - a company that would otherwise have to perform Herculean tasks, tasks none of the rest of us have ever had to perform, or maybe even tasks impossible with the State of the Art - is not, IMHO, waste. --- What about the case of an NSP looking to obtain a block to begin business with? A case where the parent company (via direct ownership and mergers) holds a couple of /16 allocations across a nationwide LAN infrastructure, and at the same time is not able to deliver to a spinoff arm of the company a 'clean' chunk of space to bring up a very large Internet Backbone. At the same time, the parent company has 0 SWIP documentation of the existing /16s and is still about 18 months away from a total migration to 10.x.x.x space internally. What is ARINs job at this point? To force the spinoff to document the IP allocations within the Sister company before they allow you to do business, or based on the current and future deployment (and CIDR capabilities) allocate sufficient address space to allow the business to launch and grow.

1 0

Re: Strange BGP announcement.
by Dave Curado 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

> Since this isn't directly my upstream's problem I've edited them out of the > log (actually, this could have come from more than one of my upstreams) > > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP RECV x.x.x.x+179 -> x.x.x.x+1161 > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP RECV message type 2 (Update) length 64 > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP RECV flags 0x40 code Origin(1): Incomplete > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP RECV flags 0x40 code ASPath(2): (0x02 0x07 0x0f 0x7f 0x02 0xbd 0x0d 0xa5 0x03 0x30 0x03 0x2f 0x03 0x2e) > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP RECV flags 0x40 code NextHop(3): x.x.x.x > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP RECV flags 0xc0 code Aggregator(7): 6218 206.53.128.254 > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP RECV 206.148.144/22 > Nov 8 17:45:26 > Nov 8 17:45:26 bnp_path_attr_eer: peer x.x.x.x (External AS yyyy) bad update send NOTIFY flag 0 type 0 err_subcode 11, data 0 > Nov 8 17:45:26 NOTIFICATION sent to x.x.x.x (External AS yyyy): code 3 (Update Message Error) subcode 11 (AS path attribute problem) data > Nov 8 17:45:26 > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP SEND x.x.x.x+1161 -> x.x.x.x+179 > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP SEND message type 3 (Notification) length 21 > Nov 8 17:45:26 BGP SEND Notification code 3 (Update Message Error) subcode 11 (AS path attribute problem) > Nov 8 17:45:26 > > (We saw the problem start around 1640 GMT tonight) > > Problem at AS6218 perhaps ? (of course if this is the result of some > random corruption that can't be relied on... ) > > Anyone else see anything ? Another note on this, I wasn't able to stop the updates with a filter-list... perhaps because the AS path is problematic. I had to use a distribute list instead, listing each of the networks that 6218 is aggregating for... Not sure if this affects anyone else or not, but: access-list 21 deny 206.53.128.0 0.0.3.255 access-list 21 deny 206.53.128.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 21 deny 206.53.129.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 21 deny 206.53.130.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 21 deny 206.53.131.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 21 deny 206.148.144.0 0.0.3.255 access-list 21 deny 206.190.224.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 21 permit any davec

5 7

RE: time for a new list?
by John Fraizer 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

I don't believe that a ceiling on number of posts is a solution at all. When an issue occurs that requires, or at least RATES discussion, it would stifle effective communication. I disagree with taking all issues offline to private email as well. While I can see where it would dramatically decrease the number of messages on the list of we did so and then submitted one email with "notes" of the discussion, it will also stifle communication. Not everyone is going to pipe when they see the first or even third email on a subject. Suggestions and opinions often require some thought after reading through the thread and though some might think of the thread as idle chatter over some issue they have no interest in, others find it interesting and even educational. >At 11:57 PM 11/2/98 -0700, Forrest W. Christian wrote: > >Assuming we can't agree on what is valid and what is not - then how about a >list where a user can only post 5 messages per month? If you need to post >more than 5 messages a month to NANOG - then there is something wrong. This >would eliminate the "I said, you said" flame wars between antagonists. If >some emergency came along where one had to post more than 5 a month, they >would have to approach merit anf justify why this month is an exception. >The number 5 can be 3 or 7 for that matter. The only question is the list >serving technology (majordomo, listserv, etc.). If it is able to handle >such a function (or easily modified), we might be able to cut down on the >noise a bit. > >-Hank ------- John Fraizer | __ _ The System Administrator | / / (_)__ __ ____ __ | The choice mailto:John.Fraizer@EnterZone.Net | / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / | of a GNU http://www.EnterZone.Net/ | /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | Generation A 486 is a terrible thing to waste...

2 1

Has anyone else
by alex＠nac.net 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

seen UU Net wierdness? The UU Noc knows nothing: core1.brd>sho ip bgp 137.39.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 137.39.0.0/16, version 4783497 Paths: (3 available, no best path, advertised over EBGP) 6347 3549 (history entry) 209.83.160.97 from 209.83.160.97 (209.83.159.2) Origin IGP, localpref 100, external Community: 8001:666 8001:6347 Dampinfo: penalty 4211, flapped 47 times in 01:55:23 8001 8001 4969 6461 701, (suppressed due to dampening) 207.106.96.5 from 207.106.96.5 Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external Community: 0:6861 8001:666 8001:4969 Dampinfo: penalty 5566, flapped 54 times in 01:54:20, reuse in 00:43:20 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am. Alex Rubenstein, alex(a)nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone! http://www.nac.net -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

3 2

IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS?
by Daniel Senie 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

I'm looking for information on how and/or when ANS takes updated information from the IRR databases (RADB in this case) and applies them internally. I've got a case where a net has just been moved from one ISP to another, and while a new entry was placed in the RADB, there is no connectivity from the net in question to anyplace in ANS. >From various observations, ANS is the only net not accepting routes for this particular net. I've looked at the various looking glass servers, and of the ones I know of, everything looks OK (and indeed connectivity is OK). Are there any looking glass capabilities to see what ANS is routing? One guess is that ANS only takes new data from the RADB on a set schedule and insufficient time has elapsed for that data to reach their internal files. I've got a number of other nets to be moved shortly, so I'd really like to be clear on how this works. It appears that very few nets rely on the data in the RADB, or take updated data from the RADB in near-real-time fashion. Any/all info appreciated. Dan -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts(a)senie.com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranthnetworks.com

1 0

Nanog Conf.
by Christian Nielsen 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

Two things 1. What is the ip address of the cache server? 2. When will the printer in the terminal room be up? Thanks Christian

1 0

RE: ARIN?
by Christian Kratzer 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

Hi, [stuff snipped] > And I have a whole lot of dialup users that would love to > have a static IP > so they can more easily run servers and such. Several years > ago when our > users were staticly addressed, ARIN requested that we move to dynamic > addressing. Why do my users have to be dynamically addressed > but @home's > do not? [stuff snipped] I don't think arin would object to you giving out static ip's to those of your users who specifically requst this service. ARIN will object if you want to assign a static ip every win95 Dialup person who justs uses the net to surf and check his mail. Greetings Christian -- TopLink Internet Services GmbH ck(a)171.2.195.in-addr.arpa Christian Kratzer http://noc.toplink.net/ Phone: +49 7032 2701-0 Fax: +49 7032 2701-19 FreeBSD spoken here!

10 12

Wireless
by Craig Labovitz 09 Nov '98

09 Nov '98

If anyone at NANOG has experience building Wavelan/RoamAbout wireless networks (specifically building a wireless bridged backbone), could they please stop by the back of the Imperial ballroom and see Jon or I. Thanks. - Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Craig Labovitz labovit(a)merit.edu Merit Network, Inc. http://www.merit.edu/~labovit 4251 Plymouth Road, Suite C. (734) 764-0252 (office) Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2785 (734) 647-3185 (fax)

1 0

current BGP problem
by larrys＠lexis-nexis.com 08 Nov '98

08 Nov '98

As of 17:45, UU's status page said 'normal'. What's anybody else seeing? thanx, -ls-

2 1

UUNet outage
by Joe Shaw 08 Nov '98

08 Nov '98

UUNet is currently experiencing a major routing outage and they have senior backbone engineers working on it. I thought it was funny that it wasn't in the recorded list of known network outages yet it's still an outage that they know about. Jeez. Anyway, we had several BGP sessions terminated here in our Houston POP and the UUNet tech believed it was in connection with the routing oddness they are trying to fix. So, if your UUNet connection is sucking wind, this may be the reason. Regards, Joseph Shaw - jshaw(a)insync.net NetAdmin/Security - Insync Internet Services Free UNIX advocate - "I hack, therefore I am."

3 2