- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

RE: How long much advanced notice do ISPs need to deploy IPv6?
by Michel Py 22 Oct '03

22 Oct '03

> Sean Donelan wrote: > When the Internet changed from IPv4 to IPv6 how many days > advance notice was needed? Uhh if the Internet has changed from IPv4 to IPv6 how come I can't find a single ISP that provides IPv6 service in the capital of California? Michel.

3 2

cityinternet.org DNS issues..
by Neezam Haniff 22 Oct '03

22 Oct '03

Hi, Has anyone had any fun and exciting DNS issues pertaining to cityinternet.org? For example, try: dig NS1.CITYINTERNET.ORG or dig NS1.CITYINTERNET.ORG If you want to see something really cool, do a WHOIS lookup on 69.64.70.248. Our nameserver is getting inundated with danger messages and I'm trying to figure out a workaround. Thanks in advance for your time. Neezam.

3 6

NorthStar IP Management Database Scalability?
by Rachel K. Warren 22 Oct '03

22 Oct '03

Hello, Could people who are using the NorthStar IP Management database please email me privately? I have some scalability issues about the product I want to ask about, specifically how many users can be on at the same time without the application slowing down signifigantly or having the application die. Comments privately are appreciated. Thanks- Rachel -- All men whilst they are awake are in one common world; but each of them, when he is asleep, is in a world of his own. - Plutarch

1 0

Gammanetworks
by Mark Radabaugh 22 Oct '03

22 Oct '03

Anyone know if GammaNetworking is black/whitehat (http://www.gammanetworking.com)? I don't find much on them but they are supporting at least one spam gang and unresponsive to inquiries. Mark Radabaugh Amplex (419) 720-3635

1 0

RE: How long much advanced notice do ISPs need to deploy IPv6?
by Michel Py 22 Oct '03

22 Oct '03

> Christopher L. Morrow > note, I'm obviously NOT a sales person, BUT... > http://www.verio.net/access/ipv6.cfm > perhaps you should ask them? Oh, I see. So, this new Internet that has changed to IPv6 requires me to buy a point-to-point link to a POP a hundred miles away to get a "pre-commercial service". I'm thrilled. Michel.

1 0

More on AT&T and whitelists
by Hank Nussbacher 22 Oct '03

22 Oct '03

http://slashdot.org/articles/03/10/22/0130216.shtml?tid=111&tid=126&tid=187… -Hank

1 0

Re: Unusual GET requests
by Brian Bruns 22 Oct '03

22 Oct '03

Thanks to everyone who's responded. We were a bit concerned because of all the lovely new exploits going around as of late, and had no idea what it was up to (considering it was coming from a cable modem, it threw up a red flag). Sorry to bother everyone :) -------------------------- Brian Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources http://www.sosdg.org ICQ: 8077511 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Krueger" <benjamin(a)seattlefenix.net> To: "Brian Bruns" <bruns(a)2mbit.com> Cc: <nanog(a)merit.edu>; <admins(a)2mbit.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 9:20 PM Subject: Re: Unusual GET requests > * Brian Bruns (bruns(a)2mbit.com) [031021 18:01]: > > > > Hmmm, this is probably offtopic, but I can't seem to find anything online > > which explains this and I've never seen it before. > > > > Maybe someone else here has seen this in their logs or has any idea what > > would do this? > > > > Its obviously trying to gather some sort of information, could it be a > > prelude to some sort of DoS or exploit thats not publically known yet? > [ ... snip loggy type stuff ... ] > > http://www.asp-shareware.org/pad/ > > -- > Benjamin Krueger > > Confidence is the mother of success. Cockyness is a mother of a time bomb. >

1 0

NSI gives away a years reg and free transfer of the domain name...
by todd glassey 21 Oct '03

21 Oct '03

Hey all - I got this advertising email blurb today from NSI saying that I could move all my domains to NSI and get an additional free years subscription. And there is NO movement cost. Interesting marketing ploy - how many others got one of these... Todd

2 1

OT: Chicago field trip, late tonight...
by Bill Woodcock 21 Oct '03

21 Oct '03

In November, 2000, the radio show This American Life condensed twenty-four hours of life in a Chicago neighborhood 24-hour cafe into a one-hour show. This cafe was the site of notable quantitative experiments demonstrating that rotating pies sold significantly better than static ones. We may wish to independently corroborate their results using the same data source. I propose that we conduct this experiment at midnight, tonight. The Golden Apple cafe can be reached on the El, Chicago's elevated railway: http://www.transitchicago.com/maps/maps/F2003N.html Wellington on the Brown Line or Scheffield on the Purple Line (same station). The This American Life radio show, with a textual abstract and full version in Real Audio: http://207.70.82.73/pages/descriptions/00/172.html A restaurant review: http://entertainment.metromix.chicagotribune.com/top/1,1419,M-Metromix-Rest… And a driving map, in case you don't like the train: http://www.mapquest.com/directions/main.adp?go=1&do=nw&ct=NA&1y=US&1a=540+n… If folks like, they can meet in the lobby of the Marriott at 11:20pm. -Bill

1 0

Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail
by Jeff Wasilko 21 Oct '03

21 Oct '03

----- Forwarded message ----- Return-Path: <rm-antiattspam(a)ems.att.com> Message-ID: <3F80414B002D0EC2(a)attrh0i.attrh.att.com> (added by postmaster(a)attrh1i.attrh.att.com) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 2.102 (B2.12; Q2.03) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:21:50 UT Subject: *** ACTION: IP Address of Outbound SMTP Server Requested (Updated 10/21/03) From: rm-antiattspam(a)ems.att.com AT&T Business Partners & Customers AT&T has received many of the requested IP addresses in response to an e-mail originally broadcast yesterday to our business partners and clients. However, we have also received many concerned responses to the original request. This 2nd e-mail is to let you know that this is a legitimate AT&T request asking for your cooperation, which will let us improve the service that AT&T offers you and that our partnership requires. We have provided a toll-free number below to help you confirm the legitimacy of this request. We have assembled the distribution list for this e-mail by looking up the administrative contacts for each of the known e-mail domains we currently exchange e-mail with, referencing WHOIS and other such services available via the Internet. What AT&T is asking is for you to help AT&T to restrict incoming mail to just our known and trusted sources (e.g., business partners, clients and customers). Therefore, we need to know which IP address(es) are used by your outbound e-mail service so we can selectively permit them. Please send this information to the following e-mail address (rm-antiattspam(a)ems.att.com) If you need assistance determining what these IP addresses are, please contact your company's administrative e-mail server support / network administration personnel. We regret that AT&T is burdening you with this request, but our AT&T security team is advising that we take this step to help safeguard our e-mail systems, which ultimately will help us serve you better. Please contact us with any concerns or questions: AT&T Security Help Desk 1-800-456-4230, prompt 4 (8am - 10pm est) Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We appreciate your cooperation. Sincerely, Brian Williams, IP Network Services Tim Scholl - District Manager, IP Network Services Kevin O'Connell - Division Manager, Information Technology Services Engineering Bill O'Hern - Division Manager, Network Security ----- Original Message (Sent Monday, 10/20/03) ----- AT&T has an urgent situation with our anti-spam list. In order to continue to allow email to AT&T you need to provide the IP addresses of all your outbound email gateways. If you do not respond immediately, your access may not continue. The required information should be sent to rm-antiattspam(a)ems.att.com. ----- End forwarded message -----

6 6