- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Sprint Problems?
by Crist Clark 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

Having trouble getting anything out of our Sprint rep. Rumors of fiber whack. Problems out here in San Jose, California and in Texas, Waco vicinity. Hard to say whether some of our problems over the rest of North America are related to Texas and California or more widespread. Voice and data problems. Anyone have better info on what, where, and resolution? -- Crist J. Clark crist.clark(a)globalstar.com Globalstar Communications (408) 933-4387

5 5

West Coast broken?
by Erik Amundson 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

Mud slides? Fiber cuts? What the heck? All my west-coast lines went splat a while ago... Erik Amundson A+, N+, CCNA, CCNP IT and Network Manager Open Access Technology Int'l, Inc. Phone (763) 201-2005 Fax (763) 553-2813 mailto:erik.amundson@oati.net CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: This email and any attachment(s) contain confidential and/or proprietary information of Open Access Technology International, Inc. Do not copy or distribute without the prior written consent of OATI. If you are not a named recipient to the message, please notify the sender immediately and do not retain the message in any form, printed or electronic.

2 1

Re: Sprint Problems?
by John Neiberger 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

>>> Joe Blanchard <joej(a)Rocknyou.com> 1/9/06 2:29:29 PM >>> > > >Were seeing issues with Sprint over to the Westcoast. Informal report is >a fiber cut in Northern CA. > > I don't know if it's related but we also lost a point-to-point circuit from Denver to CA at 13:19 Mountain time. A portion of that circuit rides on Sprint facilities. John --

2 1

RE: Sprint Problems?
by Nine, Jason 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

Austin, TX has spotty sprint coverage, customers complaining of fast busy when dialing sprint prefixes. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Joe Blanchard Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:29 PM To: cristclearclark(a)globalstar.com; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Sprint Problems? Were seeing issues with Sprint over to the Westcoast. Informal report is a fiber cut in Northern CA.

1 0

Re: Sprint Problems?
by Joe Blanchard 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

Were seeing issues with Sprint over to the Westcoast. Informal report is a fiber cut in Northern CA.

1 0

Weird PSTN issues anyone?
by Jay Hennigan 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

I'm getting reports of reorder and intercept recordings intermittently from wireless phones on multiple carriers to landlines and also landline to landline. Not enough data points to narrow it down much further and redialing seems to get through after a couple of tries. Calls originating in Dallas terminating in California. Anyone else notice the same thing? Fiber cut somewhere? -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay(a)west.net NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/ WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323

2 1

Re: QWest is having some pretty nice DNS issues right now
by Christopher L. Morrow 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 bmanning(a)vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:30:12PM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > > > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Simon Waters wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday 07 Jan 2006 02:54, you wrote: > > > > > > > > While it's tempting to make fun of Qwest here, variations on this theme - > > > > > > I do agree the management issue with DNS are far harder, and here longer TTL > > > are a double edged sword. But it is hard to design a system where the > > > mistakes don't propagate to every DNS server, although some of the common > > > tools do make it easier to check things are okay before updates are unleased. > > > > What's interesting to me, atleast, is that this is about the 5th time > > someone has said similar things in the last 6 months: "DNS is harder than > > I thought it was" (or something along that line...) > > > > So, do most folks think: > > 1) get domain-name > > 2) get 2 machines for DNS servers > > 3) put ips in TLD system and roll! > > > > It seems like maybe that is all too common. Are the 'best practices' > > documented for Authoritative DNS somewhere central? Are they just not well > > publicized? Do registrars offer this information for end-users/clients? Do > > they show how their hosted solutions are better/works/in-compliance-with > > these best practices? (worldnic comes to mind) > > > > Should this perhaps be better documented and presented at a future NANOG > > meeting? (and thus placed online in presentation format) > > > > -Chris > > IETF tech transfer failure... see RFC 2870 (mislabled as > root-server) for TLD zone machine best practices from several > years ago... for even older guidelines ... RFC 1219. Perhaps this falls under: "better documented" or "easy to find" or "not publicized" ? I'd be interested to see how many DNS hosting providers actually follow these themselves. Take EasyDNS for example (since they are on my mind, due to their GOOD service actually): easydns.com. 3600 NS ns1.easydns.com. easydns.com. 3600 NS ns2.easydns.com. easydns.com. 3600 NS remote1.easydns.com. easydns.com. 3600 NS remote2.easydns.com. NS1.easydns.com. 3600 A 216.220.40.243 NS2.easydns.com. 29449 A 209.200.151.4 remote1.easydns.com. 29434 A 209.200.131.4 remote2.easydns.com. 29428 A 205.210.42.20 CIDR: 205.210.42.0/24 NetName: SHMOOZE-NET prolexic/Prime Communications Ltd. DONBEST (NET-209-200-131-0-1) 209.200.131.0 - 209.200.131.255 NetRange: 216.220.32.0 - 216.220.63.255 CIDR: 216.220.32.0/19 NetName: Q9-NET1 NetRange: 209.200.128.0 - 209.200.191.255 CIDR: 209.200.128.0/18 NetName: PROLEXIC So, 4 ips, 3 ISP's 3 route objects... they seem to atleast follow some of the requirements. -Chris

1 0

NOC Contact for Tonline.de
by Wayne Gustavus (nanog) 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

Anyone from Tonline.de on the list or anyone have a contact for them? It appears they have outdated bogon filters that are blocking some of our customers. PLease contact off-list, thanks. ___________________________________________________________ Wayne Gustavus, CCIE #7426 IP Operations Support Verizon Internet Services ___________________________________________________________ "Can you ping me now? Good!"

1 0

net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching
by Sean Donelan 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

So, maybe an operational question. What are people seeing as far as network traffic loads due to WMF patching activity, e.g. auto-update and manual downloads? Microsoft has used several CDNs in addition to its own servers to distribute the load in the past.

5 6

Fwd: [OCCAID] 6bone addresses going away in June
by eric 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

Enough talk about viruses and unpatched hosts! <grin> Maybe if we try hard enough, we can create a Y2K syndrome for the removal of 3ffe:: from global routing? ----- Forwarded message from Mike Bran <mbran(a)occaid.org> ----- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:27:11 -0500 From: Mike Bran <mbran(a)occaid.org> To: occaid(a)cnacs.occaid.org Subject: [OCCAID] 6bone addresses going away in June Everyone- Pursuant to RFC 3701 calling for "6BONE Phaseout" 3FFE prefixes remain valid only until June 6, 2006. Those who are still using 6BONE based address space and transit service must take appropriate action now instead of waiting to the last minute. We will begin filtering 3ffe::/16 traffic by the earlier of: (i) June 6 2006; (ii) when transiting traffic sourced from or destined to 3ffe address space drops below 5% of our aggregate network traffic. --mikeb Regards, Mike Bran IP Global Network Operations Center OCCAID, Inc. w: http://www.occaid.org p: +1 617 459 4051 x 500 e: mbran(a)occaid.org _______________________________________________ OCCAID Mailing List November 1, 2005: OCCAID 5th Year Anniversary! http://www.occaid.org Occaid(a)cnacs.occaid.org is the list posting address. db-admin(a)cnacs.occaid.org is the human contact address. See below URL for subscribe/unsubscribe and list options: http://mailman.twdx.net/mailman/listinfo/occaid ----- End forwarded message -----

6 6