- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections
by Mike Lyon 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

If they allow antennas on the roof, we can service them :) Your house, on the other hand, we already lucked out on that one! -Mike Lyon Ridge Wireless > On Feb 16, 2022, at 16:48, Matthew Petach <mpetach(a)netflight.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 1:16 PM Josh Luthman <josh(a)imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> I'll once again please ask for specific examples as I continue to see the generic "it isn't in some parts of San Jose". > > > You want a specific example? > > Friend of mine asked me to help them get better Internet connectivity a few weeks ago. > > They live here: > https://www.google.com/maps/place/Meridian+Woods+Condos/@37.3200394,-121.97… > > Just off of I-280 in the heart of San Jose. > > I dug and dug, and called different companies. > The only service they can get there is the 768K DSL service they already have with AT&T. > > Go ahead. Try it for yourself. > > See what service you can order to those condos. > > Heart of Silicon Valley. > > Worse connectivity than many rural areas. :( > > Matt

8 10

LEC copper removal from commercial properties
by Martin Hannigan 20 Feb '22

20 Feb '22

NANOG'ers; At least in Boston, commercial property owners are receiving notices that 'copper lines are being removed per FCC rules' and replaced with fiber. The property owner, not the network operators (or users of unbundled elements if that's even still a thing) are being presented with an agreement that acknowledges the removal, authorizes the fiber installation and provides for a minor oversight of the design. It suggests that no costs are involved in terms of hosting equipment. No power reimbursement. No rent for spaces used. There is an ominous paragraph in the letter that says if the property owner doesn't comply that tenants will lose all services including elevator phones, alarms, voice, internet and any copper/ds0 originated services. They didn't say 911, but that would go without saying. Has anyone heard of this? What FCC rule requires this? Thanks for any insights. Warm regards, Martin

14 24

IETF works on source address validation in intra-domain and inter-domain networks
by tolidan＠tsinghua.edu.cn 20 Feb '22

20 Feb '22

Dear colleagues, We are now working on source address validation technologies for intra-domain and inter-domain networks, aiming at overcoming the improper block or improper permit problems of existing uRPF technology. We will have a BoF meeting on this topic in IETF 113 (refer to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-li-sav-for-intra-and-inter-domain-ne tworks/). We also created a mailing list in IETF (savnet(a)ietf.org <mailto:savnet@ietf.org> ) for discussion. The subscription portal of the mailing list is https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savnet. If you have interest in this topic, you are welcome to join the mailing list and attend the BoF. Best, Dan Li

1 0

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections
by Mike Hammett 19 Feb '22

19 Feb '22

*nods* I agree. Usually, it's too many spineless people that won't stand up to someone that couldn't make friends in high school. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dorn Hetzel" <dorn(a)hetzel.org> To: sronan(a)ronan-online.com Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog(a)ics-il.net>, "NANOG" <nanog(a)nanog.org> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2022 10:16:06 AM Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Yeah, the evils of HOAs go *way* beyond shitty internet.... On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 11:15 AM < sronan(a)ronan-online.com > wrote: Sounds like you’ve never lived in an HOA. <blockquote> On Feb 19, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Mike Hammett < nanog(a)ics-il.net > wrote: <blockquote> "A single customer who has no sway over an entire HOA" If you can't sway the whole HOA, then the problem must not be that bad. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Cory Sell via NANOG" < nanog(a)nanog.org > To: "Mike Lyon" < mike.lyon(a)gmail.com > Cc: "NANOG" < nanog(a)nanog.org > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 7:16:37 PM Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections See this is my point. People always dismiss these issues and say they could easily get service. Then, when someone comes in with an actual request for said service, the answer we get is about structured deals with HOA/property management. What about for a single customer? A single customer who has no sway over an entire HOA, a single customer who is told to go “pound sand” by the property manager. If you can’t give a single figure or even rough numbers for a single customer, I’d say avoid dismissing the problem. If you can provide that now, I’d be very curious to still see them. :) On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 7:10 PM, Mike Lyon < mike.lyon(a)gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> Depends on many factors… If the whole HOA wanted service, then a licensed link could possibly be put in delivering a high capacity circuit delivering about 100 Mbps to the subscriber. Price to the customer would vary depending on how the deal is structured with the HOA/property management company. Could also look into getting some fiber delivered and feed it from that. -Mike <blockquote> On Feb 16, 2022, at 17:02, Cory Sell < corysell(a)protonmail.com > wrote: </blockquote> <blockquote> Out of pure curiosity, let’s assume they COULD put an antenna on the roof… What is the service? Bandwidth, latency expectation, cost? Note that in almost every condominium or apartment complex I have heard of, they do NOT allow roof builds. This is why satellite TV in those areas require people to put an antenna on their patio, even if it’s half-blocked. On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 6:51 PM, Mike Lyon < mike.lyon(a)gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> If they allow antennas on the roof, we can service them :) Your house, on the other hand, we already lucked out on that one! -Mike Lyon Ridge Wireless <blockquote> On Feb 16, 2022, at 16:48, Matthew Petach < mpetach(a)netflight.com > wrote: </blockquote> <blockquote> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 1:16 PM Josh Luthman < josh(a)imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: <blockquote> I'll once again please ask for specific examples as I continue to see the generic "it isn't in some parts of San Jose". </blockquote> You want a specific example? Friend of mine asked me to help them get better Internet connectivity a few weeks ago. They live here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Meridian+Woods+Condos/@37.3200394,-121.97… Just off of I-280 in the heart of San Jose. I dug and dug, and called different companies. The only service they can get there is the 768K DSL service they already have with AT&T. Go ahead. Try it for yourself. See what service you can order to those condos. Heart of Silicon Valley. Worse connectivity than many rural areas. :( Matt </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>

2 1

2022 NANOG Program Committee Nominations
by Valerie Wittkop 18 Feb '22

18 Feb '22

NANOG Community, I am excited to announce that 15 NANOG members accepted appointments to the Program Committee. 20 highly-qualified volunteers from the NANOG membership were nominated for this year’s committee selection, and we personally thank each NANOG member who offered their time. As an organization, NANOG was founded by volunteers who developed a quality forum for North America’s operator community. Despite the growth in NANOG’s programs, volunteers greatly outnumber professional staff, and the volunteer-only Program Committee (PC) is wholly responsible for soliciting, developing, and selecting all program content presented at NANOG meetings and other events. Please join me in congratulating the appointed PC members: Melchior Aelmans, Kam Agahian, Aaron Atac, Jason Bothe, Mark Buell, Elizabeth Culley, Cat Gurinsky, Mikael Holmberg, Bryan Jong, John Kristoff, Fearghas McKay, James Shank, Mike Starr, Steve Ulrich, and Chris Woodfield. Please also join me in thanking and recognizing the many contributions of PC alumni Omkar Bhalekar, Michael Costello, Hau Fu, Tom Kacprzynski, Ognian Mitev, Matt Ringel, Kat Ronay, and Eddy Winstead. We are truly excited to see what the community will submit to the PC for NANOG 85 this June; so please submit talk ideas at <https://nanog.org/meetings/submit-presentation/>nanog.org/presentations <https://www.nanog.org/presentations>. And please join us in June if you can! Sincerely, Valerie Wittkop (On behalf of the NANOG Board of Directors) Valerie Wittkop Program Director vwittkop(a)nanog.org | +1 734-730-0225 (mobile) | www.nanog.org NANOG | 305 E. Eisenhower Pkwy, Suite 100 | Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA ASN 19230

1 0

Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report
by Routing Table Analysis Role Account 18 Feb '22

18 Feb '22

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net. For historical data, please see https://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfsinoz(a)gmail.com>. IPv4 Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 19 Feb, 2022 BGP Table (Global) as seen in Japan. Report Website: https://thyme.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: https://thyme.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 888099 Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS): 335036 Deaggregation factor: 2.65 Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets): 427841 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 72856 Prefixes per ASN: 12.19 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 62489 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 25791 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 10367 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 378 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.3 Max AS path length visible: 53 Max AS path prepend of ASN (265020) 50 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 945 Number of instances of unregistered ASNs: 949 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 38594 Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 32152 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 150010 Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 24 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 1 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 523 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 3068725632 Equivalent to 182 /8s, 233 /16s and 9 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 82.9 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 82.9 Percentage of available address space allocated: 100.0 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 99.5 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 300697 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 232657 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 65852 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 3.53 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 227464 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 94149 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 12389 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 18.36 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3556 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1715 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 29 Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 7585 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 773730816 Equivalent to 46 /8s, 30 /16s and 50 /24s APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319, 58368-59391, 63488-64098, 64297-64395, 131072-151865 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 36/8, 39/8, 42/8, 43/8, 49/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 101/8, 103/8, 106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8, 163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 258735 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 119151 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.17 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 258933 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 123539 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18984 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 13.64 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 6895 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1960 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.8 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 32 Number of ARIN region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 4356 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 1295998464 Equivalent to 77 /8s, 63 /16s and 94 /24s ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959, 46080-47103 53248-55295, 62464-63487, 64198-64296, 393216-401308 ARIN Address Blocks 3/8, 4/8, 6/8, 7/8, 8/8, 9/8, 11/8, 12/8, 13/8, 15/8, 16/8, 17/8, 18/8, 19/8, 20/8, 21/8, 22/8, 23/8, 24/8, 26/8, 28/8, 29/8, 30/8, 32/8, 33/8, 34/8, 35/8, 38/8, 40/8, 44/8, 47/8, 48/8, 50/8, 52/8, 53/8, 54/8, 55/8, 56/8, 57/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, 66/8, 67/8, 68/8, 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, 72/8, 73/8, 74/8, 75/8, 76/8, 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, 99/8, 100/8, 104/8, 107/8, 108/8, 128/8, 129/8, 130/8, 131/8, 132/8, 134/8, 135/8, 136/8, 137/8, 138/8, 139/8, 140/8, 142/8, 143/8, 144/8, 146/8, 147/8, 148/8, 149/8, 152/8, 155/8, 156/8, 157/8, 158/8, 159/8, 160/8, 161/8, 162/8, 164/8, 165/8, 166/8, 167/8, 168/8, 169/8, 170/8, 172/8, 173/8, 174/8, 184/8, 192/8, 198/8, 199/8, 204/8, 205/8, 206/8, 207/8, 208/8, 209/8, 214/8, 215/8, 216/8, RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 254187 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 116585 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 2.18 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 250651 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 149300 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 28187 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 8.89 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 12128 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3981 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.3 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 32 Number of RIPE region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 10661 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 713880704 Equivalent to 42 /8s, 140 /16s and 244 /24s RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055, 47104-52223, 56320-58367 59392-61439, 61952-62463, 64396-64495 196608-213403 RIPE Address Blocks 2/8, 5/8, 25/8, 31/8, 37/8, 46/8, 51/8, 62/8, 77/8, 78/8, 79/8, 80/8, 81/8, 82/8, 83/8, 84/8, 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8, 89/8, 90/8, 91/8, 92/8, 93/8, 94/8, 95/8, 109/8, 141/8, 145/8, 151/8, 176/8, 178/8, 185/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/8, 195/8, 212/8, 213/8, 217/8, LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 114057 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 27367 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.17 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 114744 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 48538 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 10938 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 10.49 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 2661 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2221 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.9 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 53 Number of LACNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 8621 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 176610816 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 134 /16s and 222 /24s LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, 52224-53247, 61440-61951, 64099-64197, 262144-273820 + ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 177/8, 179/8, 181/8, 186/8, 187/8, 189/8, 190/8, 191/8, 200/8, 201/8, AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 27518 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 5371 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 5.12 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 35784 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 11855 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1595 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 22.44 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 551 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 314 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.2 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 34 Number of AfriNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 929 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 108180224 Equivalent to 6 /8s, 114 /16s and 179 /24s AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887, 327680-329727 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 45/8, 102/8, 105/8, 154/8, 196/8, 197/8, APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 9808 9066 8886 46 CHINAMOBILE-CN China Mobile Communicati 7545 5874 788 691 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 4538 4681 4192 74 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 7552 3603 1330 19 VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel Group, VN 7713 3488 1038 51 TELKOMNET-AS-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indon 45899 3434 1880 57 VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN 4766 2557 11123 631 KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom, KR 9498 2379 475 238 BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd., IN 45090 2170 1438 79 TENCENT-NET-AP Shenzhen Tencent Compute 4755 2113 429 198 TATACOMM-AS TATA Communications formerl Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-APNIC ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 16509 6277 10186 2660 AMAZON-02, US 11492 4437 294 747 CABLEONE, US 22773 3957 3028 367 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC, US 7155 3899 264 31 VIASAT-SP-BACKBONE, US 16625 3650 1883 2566 AKAMAI-AS, US 6327 3382 1318 62 SHAW, CA 749 2887 50780 2143 DNIC-AS-00749, US 30036 2617 375 123 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS, US 209 2520 4962 428 CENTURYLINK-US-LEGACY-QWEST, US 20115 2255 3037 502 CHARTER-20115, US Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-ARIN RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 12479 6805 1731 150 UNI2-AS, ES 9121 6754 1692 17 TTNET, TR 8551 4014 378 39 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Interne 20940 3891 3347 207 AKAMAI-ASN1, NL 39891 3274 188 25 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 12389 2962 2290 910 ROSTELECOM-AS, RU 9009 2464 249 1282 M247, GB 34984 2240 359 605 TELLCOM-AS, TR 47331 1957 313 1494 TTNET, TR 58224 1791 929 579 TCI, IR Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-RIPE LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 10310 3415 566 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 10620 3467 519 705 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 11830 2457 369 62 Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad 13999 1668 285 474 Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V., MX 6503 1442 354 524 Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V., MX 28573 1397 2330 246 CLARO S.A., BR 3816 1251 660 146 COLOMBIA TELECOMUNICACIONES S.A. ESP, C 26615 1152 2351 140 TIM SA, BR 6147 1091 369 21 Telefonica del Peru S.A.A., PE 11664 999 191 448 Techtel LMDS Comunicaciones Interactiva Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-LACNIC AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 24863 1589 393 21 LINKdotNET-AS, EG 24835 1546 523 32 RAYA-AS, EG 36992 1299 1518 262 ETISALAT-MISR, EG 36903 1199 545 114 MT-MPLS, MA 29571 896 63 58 ORANGE-COTE-IVOIRE, CI 36935 734 521 39 Vodafone-, EG 6713 612 1863 34 IAM-AS, MA 15399 519 50 33 WANANCHI-, KE 37342 468 32 1 MOVITEL, MZ 23889 422 232 16 MauritiusTelecom, MU Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-AFRINIC Global Per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 10310 3415 566 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 9808 9066 8886 46 CHINAMOBILE-CN China Mobile Communicati 12479 6805 1731 150 UNI2-AS, ES 9121 6754 1692 17 TTNET, TR 16509 6277 10186 2660 AMAZON-02, US 7545 5874 788 691 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 4538 4681 4192 74 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 11492 4437 294 747 CABLEONE, US 8551 4014 378 39 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Interne 22773 3957 3028 367 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC, US Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet Global Per AS Maximum Aggregation summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 9808 9066 9020 CHINAMOBILE-CN China Mobile Communications Grou 9121 6754 6737 TTNET, TR 12479 6805 6655 UNI2-AS, ES 7545 5874 5183 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 4538 4681 4607 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Research Net 8551 4014 3975 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Internet Backbo 7155 3899 3868 VIASAT-SP-BACKBONE, US 11492 4437 3690 CABLEONE, US 20940 3891 3684 AKAMAI-ASN1, NL 16509 6277 3617 AMAZON-02, US Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-CIDRnet List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Net Originated Transit AS Transit AS Name 46990 UNALLOCATED 8.5.242.0/23 3356 LEVEL3, US 62828 UNALLOCATED 8.21.130.0/24 3356 LEVEL3, US 393266 UNALLOCATED 8.23.52.0/24 46887 LIGHTOWER, US 18604 UNALLOCATED 8.25.204.0/24 3356 LEVEL3, US 394936 UNALLOCATED 8.33.224.0/24 22442 HOU-PHONOSCOPE, US 54338 UNALLOCATED 8.33.241.0/24 6461 ZAYO-6461, US 395438 UNALLOCATED 8.42.206.0/24 3356 LEVEL3, US 395056 UNALLOCATED 8.45.133.0/24 3356 LEVEL3, US 32306 UNALLOCATED 8.46.80.0/24 33652 CMCS, US 17033 UNALLOCATED 8.48.225.0/24 3356 LEVEL3, US Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badAS Prefixes from the Special Purpose Address Registry (Global) ----------------------------------------------------------- Prefix Origin AS Description 192.88.99.0/24 6939 HURRICANE, US Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-spar Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Unassigned Network ASN Information AS Name 23.141.0.0/24 Origin: 395350 UNASSIGNED 23.141.0.0/24 Transit: 11426 TWC-11426-CAROLINAS, US 23.252.160.0/24 Origin: 398968 GROUP-IID-01, US 23.252.160.0/24 Transit: 174 COGENT-174, US 23.252.161.0/24 Origin: 398968 GROUP-IID-01, US 23.252.161.0/24 Transit: 174 COGENT-174, US 23.252.163.0/24 Origin: 398968 GROUP-IID-01, US 23.252.163.0/24 Transit: 174 COGENT-174, US 23.252.164.0/24 Origin: 398968 GROUP-IID-01, US 23.252.164.0/24 Transit: 174 COGENT-174, US Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-add-IANA Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:16 /9:13 /10:40 /11:102 /12:305 /13:591 /14:1205 /15:2030 /16:13580 /17:8357 /18:13898 /19:25191 /20:43092 /21:52309 /22:108398 /23:95274 /24:522901 /25:797 /26:0 /27:0 /28:0 /29:0 /30:0 /31:0 /32:0 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 9121 5913 6754 TTNET, TR 12479 5774 6805 UNI2-AS, ES 8151 3976 10310 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 8551 3479 4014 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Internet Backbo 11492 3357 4437 CABLEONE, US 6327 3194 3382 SHAW, CA 7155 2989 3899 VIASAT-SP-BACKBONE, US 22773 2950 3957 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC, US 39891 2810 3274 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 30036 2272 2617 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS, US Complete listing at https://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-sXXas-nos Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 1:1667 2:992 3:153 4:7 5:3793 6:103 7:5 8:1559 9:1 11:172 12:1718 13:415 14:2378 15:166 16:43 17:373 18:140 20:167 21:4 22:188 23:5492 24:2302 25:6 27:2608 29:19 31:2432 32:96 34:1 35:60 36:1728 37:3945 38:2567 39:687 40:149 41:3914 42:765 43:2094 44:292 45:16001 46:3896 47:336 49:1643 50:1916 51:107 52:1367 53:1 54:294 55:768 56:8 57:55 58:1765 59:1181 60:958 61:2274 62:2450 63:1941 64:5506 65:2307 66:4862 67:2939 68:1181 69:4170 70:1343 71:668 72:3064 74:2619 75:1516 76:717 77:2125 78:3854 79:3106 80:1969 81:1667 82:1459 83:1202 84:1340 85:3627 86:717 87:1945 88:2649 89:3233 90:510 91:7545 92:1890 93:2612 94:3264 95:4485 96:1308 97:346 98:994 99:859 100:75 101:1030 102:1965 103:28305 104:4162 105:464 106:862 107:2460 108:772 109:4197 110:2056 111:3241 112:1978 113:1499 114:1502 115:1950 116:1910 117:2511 118:2232 119:1830 120:1666 121:1038 122:2552 123:2112 124:1611 125:2111 128:1289 129:1181 130:923 131:2084 132:755 133:370 134:1925 135:283 136:857 137:863 138:2449 139:1222 140:888 141:1366 142:1256 143:1451 144:1229 145:342 146:1775 147:1471 148:2192 149:1699 150:860 151:1076 152:1827 153:448 154:3520 155:1356 156:1878 157:1229 158:1015 159:2047 160:2396 161:1302 162:3451 163:1226 164:1660 165:1569 166:638 167:1694 168:3718 169:682 170:4365 171:826 172:3018 173:3068 174:1021 175:1115 176:3541 177:4545 178:3039 179:1970 180:2278 181:2912 182:3235 183:1897 184:2387 185:19339 186:4302 187:3556 188:3849 189:3015 190:8828 191:1309 192:11052 193:8526 194:6923 195:4991 196:2922 197:2340 198:6008 199:5993 200:7512 201:5656 202:10429 203:9977 204:4558 205:3373 206:3793 207:3401 208:4011 209:4621 210:4241 211:2454 212:3950 213:3384 214:1156 215:64 216:6385 217:2641 218:1247 219:599 220:1950 221:987 222:859 223:2170 End of report

1 0

Contact for Beanfield Technologies Inc (AS21949)
by Michael Zarglis 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

Been dealing with an asymmetric routing issue and have not gotten anywhere with their level 1 support in 2 weeks. Would really appreciate if there is anyone from Beanfield on this list could please reach out to me. Thanks for your time, Michael Zarglis

2 2

VPN recommendations?
by William Herrin 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

Hi folks, Do you have any recommendations for VPN appliances? Specifically: I need to build a site to site VPNs at speeds between 100mpbs and 1 gbit where all but one of the sites are behind an IPv4 NAT gateway with dynamic public IP addresses. Normally I'd throw OpenVPN on a couple of Linux boxes and be happy but my customer insists on a network appliance. Site to site VPNs using IPSec and static IP addresses on the plaintext side are a dime a dozen but traversing NAT and dynamic IP addresses (and automatically re-establishing when the service goes out and comes back up with different addresses) is a hard requirement. Thanks in advance, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill(a)herrin.us <https://bill.herrin.us/> https://bill.herrin.us/

30 40

junos config commit question
by Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

On an EX4300 switch running JunOS 14.1 let's imagine I typed config delete interfaces before coming to my senses. How am I supposed to back out of that mess? For the life of me, after a week of reading the 3000 page reference manual, and endless DuckDuckGoing, I cannot see a simple way of just abandoning the commit. I've got to be missing something stunningly obvious here because it's unthinkable that this functionality doesn't exist. Help?!? The only way out I can see is to drop into the shell, make an uncompressed copy of juniper.conf.gz, then pop back into the config editor and load that over top of the editor's config view. Surely there's a saner way of dealing with this. --lyndon

15 23

Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties
by L F 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

> > Watching the Spot Price.... > > AIP sounds Suspicious > > In the Ol’ days CO’s would be broken into > And the Cu stolen... even the Telco cutoffs disappeared! > > Prices are exponentially Higher now! > > > Hmmmm.... > > > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:17 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Looks like its abandon in place "AIP" from the agreement. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:03 PM L F <liz.fazekas(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Who becomes the Beneficial Owner of the Copper once Removed? >>> >>> >>> Just Curious. >>> >>> >>> LF >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:01 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> NANOG'ers; >>>> >>>> At least in Boston, commercial property owners are receiving notices >>>> that 'copper lines are being removed per FCC rules' and replaced with >>>> fiber. The property owner, not the network operators (or users of unbundled >>>> elements if that's even still a thing) are being presented with an >>>> agreement that acknowledges the removal, authorizes the fiber installation >>>> and provides for a minor oversight of the design. It suggests that no costs >>>> are involved in terms of hosting equipment. No power reimbursement. No rent >>>> for spaces used. >>>> >>>> There is an ominous paragraph in the letter that says if the property >>>> owner doesn't comply that tenants will lose all services including elevator >>>> phones, alarms, voice, internet and any copper/ds0 originated services. >>>> They didn't say 911, but that would go without saying. >>>> >>>> Has anyone heard of this? >>>> What FCC rule requires this? >>>> >>>> Thanks for any insights. >>>> >>>> Warm regards, >>>> >>>> Martin >>>> >>> -- >>> Liz ******* >>> 416.660.5456 >>> >> -- > Liz ******* > 416.660.5456 > -- Liz ******* 416.660.5456

1 0