- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

RE: ISP customer assignments
by TJ 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

-----Original Message----- From: Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu] <Snip - good points all> > Most of those concerns are in fact mitigated by a well implemented Privacy > implementation Which is why I started off by mentioning RFC4191. ;) -----End Original Message----- And Vista/Win7/etc. make it even more interesting by not doing EUI64 at all. ... Hopefully they have more entropic 'random' values as well ... /TJ

1 0

please leak piratebay prefix 194.71.107.0/24
by Sven Olaf Kamphuis 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

we currently announce 194.71.107.0/24, unfortunately some of our carriers have been threattened by the illegal entertainment kartell mafia and dont really feel like relaying this prefix for us. if you do have this prefix over one of our peerings as i know many of you do, feel free to accidentially leak it to the rest of the world until something better is worked out :P (in a later stadium the old DCP AS is planned to be behind AS34109 again on its own, this is a temporary workaround) origin: AS34109 (CB3ROB / CYBERBUNKER) prefix: 194.71.107.0/24 action: leak :P if you want to "pick up" the piratebay prefix for your eyeballs you can do so by setting up peering with us at NL-IX (noc(a)cb3rob.net) or obtain it from several of our larger peers. -- Sven Olaf Kamphuis CB3ROB DataServices Phone: +31/87-8747479 Skype: CB3ROB MSN: sven(a)cb3rob.net C.V.: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cb3rob Confidential: Please be advised that the information contained in this email message, including all attached documents or files, is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or individuals addressed. Any other use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

1 0

Re: ISP customer assignments
by Chris Owen 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

On Oct 5, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Wayne E. Bouchard wrote: > Whenever you declare something to be "inexhasutable" all you do is > increase demand. Eventually you reach a point where you realize that > there is, in fact, a limit to the inexhaustable resource. This is where I think there is a major disconnect on IPv6. The size of the pool is just so large that people just can't wrap their heads around it. 2^128 is enough space for every man, woman and child on the planet to have around 4 billion /64s to themselves. Even if we assume everyone might possibly need say 10 /64s per person that still means we are covered until the population hits around 2,600,000,000,000,000,000. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun): President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 - A stupidity tax Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------

6 6

FairPoint New England Internet Access issues.
by Davis, Bill (Manchester, NH) 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Oct 2, 2009: Verizon identified it largest CORE Juniper router was creating issues for all of it peering points to New York and Boston having said that all of FairPoint's DIA, DSL, Fast customer had intermittent issues accessing the internet partial service was restored after Verizon reroute part of FairPoint traffic. Verizon was able to replace the Juniper router and restore full service around 1:45 PM EDT October 3rd 2009. Bill Davis William P. Davis - Director IT Network FairPoint Communications | 900 Elm St., Manchester, NH 03101 | bdavis(a)fairpoint.com <mailto:acouture@Fairpoint.com> 620-339-4786 office | 309-696-0299 Cell _______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients. They may contain confidential information, legally privileged information or other information subject to legal restrictions. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this message or its attachments, notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all copies of this message and attachments in all media.

1 0

operations contact @ facebook?
by Leland Vandervort 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Hi All, Would anyone happen to have an operations contact at Facebook by anychance? Our systems are being overwhelmed by a facebook application that we were neither aware of nor condoned. Thanks in advance. Leland Vandervort Director, Technical Operations Gandi SAS Paris t: +33 1 70 39 37 59 m: +33 6 31 15 15 07

9 12

Verizon Southeast Network Map
by Jason Bertoch 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

We're considering adding a Verizon connection to our network in Florida, so I've been looking unsuccessfully for a map of Verizon's fiber network in the southeast to verify that I'll have diverse paths with my other providers. Does anyone know if such a map exists in a public location?

2 1

Re: Minimum IPv6 size
by Brandon Butterworth 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

> Is there some central repository for information on this? We usually > seem to find out about such changes out of the ARIN region a bit after > the fact. Have we not learnt from v4? If there are to be filters then they should be defined once and never changed as people will fail to update If a different allocation requirement arises then start a new prefix (v6 is big enough to handle this) and define its filter once. Do not allocate it from an existing range and expect people to adjust their filters. brandon

4 4

ICETel Costa Rica BGP Engineers
by Ken Gilmour 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

Hi there, Is there anyone from ICETel in Costa Rica who speaks English on this list? I need to discuss some BGP stuff and my Spanish is not the best. Failing that, anyone from RACSA or other major ISP in CR will do. Thanks! Ken

1 0

OT: iPhone Problems
by Clue Store 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

Mine's rebooted at leat 3 times a day sine the upgrade :( What ever happened to quality control.... http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2152619&tstart=0

2 1

Re: Minimum IPv6 size
by Brandon Butterworth 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

> > If there are to be filters then they should be defined once and never > > changed as people will fail to update > > Yay! We can return to classful routing again. That sure worked out well > for us the first time around. ^_^; We have already, all we're discussing now is if we do a better job of implementing it. Classful suffered from lack of space in each range and too coarse a set of fixed ranges, all fixable in v6 so perhaps it's not so bad? > So, if I need to break up my /32 into 4 /34s to cover different geographical > regions, I should instead renumber into a new range set aside for /34s > and give back the /32? And what if you need a few /48's, then you're open to others advertising some of yours too. With no organised mechanism of communicating acceptable prefix lengths to all routers [1] then we either do nothing and let anarchy rule, do something that overly constrains or do half the job and have both problems. > Perhaps we should give everyone an allocation out of each filter > range, so that they can simply number from the appropriately-classed > range; when you apply for space, you'd get a /32, a /33, a /34, a /35, > a /36, etc. all from the appropriate, statically defined ranges. > > *removes tongue from cheek* What would be most efficient for all? Semi classful or not I don't mind but it does seem pointless to have been going round the same circle for so many years. brandon [1] sbgp would be secure anarchy

1 0