- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: Outage scale
by Sean Donelan 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

> Reacting to "2000 ds3s" as a large number. > We are approaching the day when we will see a million ds3 backhoe cut. At 45 > terabits, this is within the range of lab WDM systems (>1Tb per strand.) We > are still years away from seeing these widely deployed in the ground, but the > scale of outages is going to go way up. > Oddly, it is also possible that the impact of such an outage may go down. If > the bandwidth prices get cheaper, then it becomes more reasonable to have high > levels of diversity. We all understand the difficulties in keeping that > diversity real in the current world. Doubtful. Diversity requires the one thing which they aren't making more, land. The general pattern has been to put more bandwidth into fewer paths, roll everything onto the new technology, remove the old "obsolete" path from service and use it for something completely different. Putting in a single OC-192 doesn't cost much more than putting in a OC-3 fiber. But if you are only using 14% of your OC-192 path, why would any bean counter let you put in a second OC-192? Just put your protect circuit in the unused part of your existing OC-192 path (duh!) Bell Atlantic has a great FCC outage report where they say there are no recommendations for SONET diversity. Hanging both halves of the ring from the same pole doesn't violate any SONET constraints. Southwestern Bell has almost a half dozen different outages this year isolating dozens of towns in most cases due to single transmission facility failures in their new fiber optic lines. Heck, the last New Jersey outage even took out some of the state's NAWAS (Nuclear Attack Warning) circuits in northern New Jersey. Fortunately the Russians are our friends now. I think diversity will go down as one of those great unsolved problems, along with the Halting Problem.

1 0

RE: ARIN whois
by Jeff Harper 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

A humble suggestion at this point would be to take the argument between you two into private e-mails. Thanks, Jeff Harper -----Original Message----- From: Dean Anderson [mailto:dean@av8.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 10:57 AM To: Daniel Golding Cc: Kai Schlichting; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: ARIN whois No. I don't think it is ethically questionable. Each relay has started with NOQUEUE log entries. The relayer is telneting to port 25, and getting the following message: telnet odie 25 Trying 198.3.136.141... Connected to odie.av8.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220-odie.av8.com ESMTP Sendmail; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:53:11 -0500 (EST) 220-Authorized Users Only 220-Notice: Unauthorized use billed at $1 per message, $10 per bounce, 220-$90/hr for cleanup. 220 Unauthorized use over $5000 defined as criminal by 18 USC 1030(6). Around 11:38 PM 11/22/1999 -0500, rumor has it that Daniel Golding said: > >Dean, > >Have you considered that, while your stand may be legally correct, it is >ethically questionable? By leaving your relays open, you invite abuse and >facilitate the theft of other networks' resources. I can not imagine what >legitimate purpose you might have for such a practice. Perhaps the most >disturbing aspect of this is your steady beat on the drum of law and >order, combined with your strange zeal to block out IP addresses from a >large block of law abiding folks. > >I can only wish you luck in your endevour to have Federal law enforcement >officials deliver warrant on international spammers. Clearly, those folks >don't have enough to do, and need the extra work. > >- Daniel Golding > >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dean Anderson wrote: > >> >> These are coming from Mass, Cleveland, Ohio, and Virginia. >> >> We use our relays for legitimate business purposes. They are not "accidentally left open". We are not going to close them. We are going to pursue abusers civilly and criminally. The FBI assures me that it does not matter criminally that access comes from international sources. >> >> Much of the activity appears to be comming from alleged ANTI-SPAMMERs such as Chris Neill, and Alan Brown and Ron Guillemette who have been inciting attacks against us, posting to alt.2600 and advertising our service. Inciting criminal acts is a criminal act too, I'm pretty sure. We make sure to mention them prominently. >> >> --Dean >> >> Around 11:18 PM 11/21/1999 -0500, rumor has it that Kai Schlichting said: >> > >> >At 09:16 PM 11/21/99 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote: >> > >> >>Can someone send me a list of *all* AOL netblocks? ARIN's whois only gives back a handful. >> >> >> >>I want to block _all_ AOL netblocks, but its tough to find out what they are. >> >> >> >>Thanks to a few malicious, radical antispammers (Chris Neill, Alan Brown, etc) we are getting hit with a large number of criminal mail relays. Mostly coming from AOL addresses. We have about a half dozen individual criminal complaints underway. >> > >> >Don't kid us, Dan. Close your fucking relays (not that any of them talk to >> >my hosts anyhow). If this has to be drummed into your bonehead again: THEY >> >WILL FIND YOUR RELAYS ON THEIR OWN, AND THEY WILL ABUSE THEM, NO MATTER >> >HOW LOUD YOU SCREAM. THEY SIT IN CHINA, PAKISTAN AND KOREA, AND THERE IS >> >NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT THEM SHORT OF CALLING THE WHITEHOUSE AND GETTING >> >THESE PLACES INVADED. Alternatively, you could come to your senses and >> >shut the literal front door of your house now that you've finally noticed >> >the first unsavory characters passing by. A couple years after the rest >> >of us, no doubt. >> > >> >And they won't need ORBS or any other service to locate you, either. >> >Stop complaining. No more secrets (now that's from Scott Yelich's tagline). >> > >> >bye,Kai >> > >> >-- >> >kai(a)conti.nu "Just say No" to Spam Kai Schlichting >> >Palo Alto, New York, You name it Sophisticated Technical Peon >> >Kai's SpamShield <tm> is FREE! http://SpamShield.Conti.nu >> >| | >> >LeasedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes >> >WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-UnixAdmin-Security-ReallyHardMath >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com >> LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Re: ARIN whois
by Dean Anderson 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

Its not there to scare them. It just notifies them what the fees and facts are. They can't argue they didn't know what the costs were. Nor can they argue the service was offered for free. Nor can they claim the fees are punitive or otherwise specific to their particular use. Anyone, regardless of race, creed, or commercial orientation who uses our services without authorization agrees to these fees. $90/hr is our regular rate for sysadmin work. We bill quite a bit each year at this rate. The $1 and $10 fees are quite reasonable in comparision to prices of making a stock trade off the street without signing up for some deep discount service. Making a stock trade and processing messages and bounces I think are very similar in computer resources. UCC2 makes agreements between electronic agents binding. And when the unauthorized relayers are tried criminally, they can't claim they didn't intend to commit a crime. Intent, I'm told, makes a big difference in how things get treated. Well, they can try to claim it was free, and they didn't know what cost was, or that more than a certain amount was a crime, but their arguments are made weaker. I didn't get the reference to guns. I must be tired... Do you mean that telling people the consequences of gun crimes is pointless? Whether it actually prevents the crime or not, at least in some cases intentionally disregarding the law is supposed to be punished more severely than merely breaking the law. So you should try to make sure if they do the crime, they get the most severe punishment. If they think twice, and don't do the crime, you won't ever know, will you? --Dean Around 03:18 PM 11/23/1999 -0500, rumor has it that Daniel Golding said: >Dean, > >My apologies. Your scary message will surely stop spammers dead in their >tracks. Please let me know if you intend to every own a gun store. I will >have to make plans to leave the country... > >- Dan Golding > >-------------------------------------------------------------- > >On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Dean Anderson wrote: > >> No. I don't think it is ethically questionable. Each relay has started with NOQUEUE log entries. The relayer is telneting to port 25, and getting the following message: >> >> telnet odie 25 >> Trying 198.3.136.141... >> Connected to odie.av8.com. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> 220-odie.av8.com ESMTP Sendmail; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:53:11 -0500 (EST) >> 220-Authorized Users Only >> 220-Notice: Unauthorized use billed at $1 per message, $10 per bounce, >> 220-$90/hr for cleanup. >> 220 Unauthorized use over $5000 defined as criminal by 18 USC 1030(6). >> >> Around 11:38 PM 11/22/1999 -0500, rumor has it that Daniel Golding said: >> > >> >Dean, >> > >> >Have you considered that, while your stand may be legally correct, it is >> >ethically questionable? By leaving your relays open, you invite abuse and >> >facilitate the theft of other networks' resources. I can not imagine what >> >legitimate purpose you might have for such a practice. Perhaps the most >> >disturbing aspect of this is your steady beat on the drum of law and >> >order, combined with your strange zeal to block out IP addresses from a >> >large block of law abiding folks. >> > >> >I can only wish you luck in your endevour to have Federal law enforcement >> >officials deliver warrant on international spammers. Clearly, those folks >> >don't have enough to do, and need the extra work. >> > >> >- Daniel Golding >> > >> >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dean Anderson wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> These are coming from Mass, Cleveland, Ohio, and Virginia. >> >> >> >> We use our relays for legitimate business purposes. They are not "accidentally left open". We are not going to close them. We are going to pursue abusers civilly and criminally. The FBI assures me that it does not matter criminally that access comes from international sources. >> >> >> >> Much of the activity appears to be comming from alleged ANTI-SPAMMERs such as Chris Neill, and Alan Brown and Ron Guillemette who have been inciting attacks against us, posting to alt.2600 and advertising our service. Inciting criminal acts is a criminal act too, I'm pretty sure. We make sure to mention them prominently. >> >> >> >> --Dean >> >> >> >> Around 11:18 PM 11/21/1999 -0500, rumor has it that Kai Schlichting said: >> >> > >> >> >At 09:16 PM 11/21/99 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote: >> >> > >> >> >>Can someone send me a list of *all* AOL netblocks? ARIN's whois only gives back a handful. >> >> >> >> >> >>I want to block _all_ AOL netblocks, but its tough to find out what they are. >> >> >> >> >> >>Thanks to a few malicious, radical antispammers (Chris Neill, Alan Brown, etc) we are getting hit with a large number of criminal mail relays. Mostly coming from AOL addresses. We have about a half dozen individual criminal complaints underway. >> >> > >> >> >Don't kid us, Dan. Close your fucking relays (not that any of them talk to >> >> >my hosts anyhow). If this has to be drummed into your bonehead again: THEY >> >> >WILL FIND YOUR RELAYS ON THEIR OWN, AND THEY WILL ABUSE THEM, NO MATTER >> >> >HOW LOUD YOU SCREAM. THEY SIT IN CHINA, PAKISTAN AND KOREA, AND THERE IS >> >> >NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT THEM SHORT OF CALLING THE WHITEHOUSE AND GETTING >> >> >THESE PLACES INVADED. Alternatively, you could come to your senses and >> >> >shut the literal front door of your house now that you've finally noticed >> >> >the first unsavory characters passing by. A couple years after the rest >> >> >of us, no doubt. >> >> > >> >> >And they won't need ORBS or any other service to locate you, either. >> >> >Stop complaining. No more secrets (now that's from Scott Yelich's tagline). >> >> > >> >> >bye,Kai >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> >kai(a)conti.nu "Just say No" to Spam Kai Schlichting >> >> >Palo Alto, New York, You name it Sophisticated Technical Peon >> >> >Kai's SpamShield <tm> is FREE! http://SpamShield.Conti.nu >> >> >| | >> >> >LeasedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes >> >> >WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-UnixAdmin-Security-ReallyHardMath >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com >> >> LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com >> LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Re: How does Murphy know, need mail access east and west coast
by Dean Anderson 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

I am willing to setup on East Coast with someone on West Coast. I can do everything but standby generator. Have 2 APC Matrix 5000 with XR battery packs and a tonload of 1KVA UPS's tho. Could purchase more battery packs to extend uptime on 5KVa which run routers. Have local modems on site, and 20 state dialin (outsourced). And Internet access to POP & IMAP. --Dean Around 08:31 PM 11/22/1999 -0800, rumor has it that Sean Donelan said: > >How does Murphy know when to strike. > >Argh, I went almost 15 years without losing a single mail message. Less than >two months of using a "modern" mailer and they're all gone. I want my VAX/VMS >back. > >Everyone who sent me mail about needing a reporting channel for the Y2K >rollover on New Year's, could you please send me another message. I had >not copied the names down before my mailbox disappeared. > >Thanks. > >Yes, I was thinking about a backup. I sent this message early this morning, >before I lost all my mail. > >Sean Donelan [05:19 AM 11/22/99 -0800] wrote: >>Perhaps a strange request but I'm looking for two mail accounts I can >>access via a dialup (Shell or PPP) and Internet (POP3 or IMAP). >> >>Here are the requirements: >> >>One server on the Eastern US power grid >>One server on the Western US power grid >>Each served via a minimum of two backbone providers (I prefer >> the east and west server be on seperate backbones) >>Each acting as a secondary MX and DNS server for the other >>Mail server will accept mail addressed with a designated domain name >>Mail will be sent using a designated domain name >>Dialup access will be via a dial access server using at most >> a LAN connection to the mail server (no WAN links) >>The facility housing the mail server will have a UPS and >> standby generator >>Inbound mail: a minumum of 50mb mail storage >>Outbound mail: 1,000 5kb messages every four hours (LISTSERV and LSMTP >>or similar) >> >>I estimate I need the mailboxes from approximately December 1 through >>January 15. > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Re: ARIN whois
by Dean Anderson 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

No. I don't think it is ethically questionable. Each relay has started with NOQUEUE log entries. The relayer is telneting to port 25, and getting the following message: telnet odie 25 Trying 198.3.136.141... Connected to odie.av8.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220-odie.av8.com ESMTP Sendmail; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:53:11 -0500 (EST) 220-Authorized Users Only 220-Notice: Unauthorized use billed at $1 per message, $10 per bounce, 220-$90/hr for cleanup. 220 Unauthorized use over $5000 defined as criminal by 18 USC 1030(6). Around 11:38 PM 11/22/1999 -0500, rumor has it that Daniel Golding said: > >Dean, > >Have you considered that, while your stand may be legally correct, it is >ethically questionable? By leaving your relays open, you invite abuse and >facilitate the theft of other networks' resources. I can not imagine what >legitimate purpose you might have for such a practice. Perhaps the most >disturbing aspect of this is your steady beat on the drum of law and >order, combined with your strange zeal to block out IP addresses from a >large block of law abiding folks. > >I can only wish you luck in your endevour to have Federal law enforcement >officials deliver warrant on international spammers. Clearly, those folks >don't have enough to do, and need the extra work. > >- Daniel Golding > >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dean Anderson wrote: > >> >> These are coming from Mass, Cleveland, Ohio, and Virginia. >> >> We use our relays for legitimate business purposes. They are not "accidentally left open". We are not going to close them. We are going to pursue abusers civilly and criminally. The FBI assures me that it does not matter criminally that access comes from international sources. >> >> Much of the activity appears to be comming from alleged ANTI-SPAMMERs such as Chris Neill, and Alan Brown and Ron Guillemette who have been inciting attacks against us, posting to alt.2600 and advertising our service. Inciting criminal acts is a criminal act too, I'm pretty sure. We make sure to mention them prominently. >> >> --Dean >> >> Around 11:18 PM 11/21/1999 -0500, rumor has it that Kai Schlichting said: >> > >> >At 09:16 PM 11/21/99 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote: >> > >> >>Can someone send me a list of *all* AOL netblocks? ARIN's whois only gives back a handful. >> >> >> >>I want to block _all_ AOL netblocks, but its tough to find out what they are. >> >> >> >>Thanks to a few malicious, radical antispammers (Chris Neill, Alan Brown, etc) we are getting hit with a large number of criminal mail relays. Mostly coming from AOL addresses. We have about a half dozen individual criminal complaints underway. >> > >> >Don't kid us, Dan. Close your fucking relays (not that any of them talk to >> >my hosts anyhow). If this has to be drummed into your bonehead again: THEY >> >WILL FIND YOUR RELAYS ON THEIR OWN, AND THEY WILL ABUSE THEM, NO MATTER >> >HOW LOUD YOU SCREAM. THEY SIT IN CHINA, PAKISTAN AND KOREA, AND THERE IS >> >NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT THEM SHORT OF CALLING THE WHITEHOUSE AND GETTING >> >THESE PLACES INVADED. Alternatively, you could come to your senses and >> >shut the literal front door of your house now that you've finally noticed >> >the first unsavory characters passing by. A couple years after the rest >> >of us, no doubt. >> > >> >And they won't need ORBS or any other service to locate you, either. >> >Stop complaining. No more secrets (now that's from Scott Yelich's tagline). >> > >> >bye,Kai >> > >> >-- >> >kai(a)conti.nu "Just say No" to Spam Kai Schlichting >> >Palo Alto, New York, You name it Sophisticated Technical Peon >> >Kai's SpamShield <tm> is FREE! http://SpamShield.Conti.nu >> >| | >> >LeasedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes >> >WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-UnixAdmin-Security-ReallyHardMath >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com >> LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

3 2

RE: ARIN whois
by Derek J. Balling 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

At 08:38 PM 11/23/99 +0300, Alex P. Rudnev wrote: >If you protect yourself from open relays too hard, you really protect yourself >from the usefull mail. It's reality. Useful mail doesn't come from open relays. At least not in the manner in which I (and others) define useful. >The best way to stop the SPAM is to turn your computer off. There is many >reasons why someone hold open relay; while this relay don't send you spam, >it's >not your business... many providers simpli filter open relay detectors out >(such >as ODBS), moreover, an attempt to use this _crazy_ (active) lists results >in the >loss e-mail and can't be used by the serious companies. You think too far into the box. The best way to stop spam is to turn off the spammers' computers. D

2 1

outage scales
by Jerry Scharf 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

Reacting to "2000 ds3s" as a large number. We are approaching the day when we will see a million ds3 backhoe cut. At 45 terabits, this is within the range of lab WDM systems (>1Tb per strand.) We are still years away from seeing these widely deployed in the ground, but the scale of outages is going to go way up. Oddly, it is also possible that the impact of such an outage may go down. If the bandwidth prices get cheaper, then it becomes more reasonable to have high levels of diversity. We all understand the difficulties in keeping that diversity real in the current world. jerry

1 0

RE: ARIN whois
by Dean Anderson 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

Odd. Many gas stations here do just that. Pump is open. You drive up, put gas in. Then pay the amount indicated. If you drive away without paying, you can't say the pump was open to anyone. Sure, the credit card before you pump is more secure because its harder to drive away without paying. I would love such a capability (usefully deployed) in sendmail...or qmail. Its just not there, or hasn't been there. But I agree that argument by analogy is generally not too useful. Seems no one is ever convinced they are wrong upon discovering that their analogy doesn't actually support their argument. --Dean Around 07:17 PM 11/23/1999 +1000, rumor has it that Bruce Campbell said: > >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote: > >> > What "legitimate business purposes" necessitate leaving SMTP >> > relays open >> > to the world? >> >> How about running a commercial email gateway? > >Lets try another analogy set, ie You run a gas station. > >open-relay: > You give out free fuel to whoever turns up in a vehicle capable of > accepting fuel from your bowser. > >pop-before-smtp authentication: > You require a valid corporate fleet card before handing out fuel. > >full-anti-relay: > You require payment before letting them near the bowser. > >trusted-hosts or IP-based access lists: > If their numberplate is in a certain range, give them free fuel. > >> How about commercial anonymous re-mailers? > >Ah, this would be: > > You give out free fuel on sighting, but not verifying, a corporate > fleet card, and give them a new car. > >--==-- >Bruce. > >Peregrinus expectavi pedes meos in cymbalis est. > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Re: ARIN whois
by Dean Anderson 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

We haven't had any criminal acts until a couple weeks ago. --Dean Around 03:57 PM 11/22/1999 -0800, rumor has it that Derek J. Balling said: > >Dean, > >Until you actually WIN a criminal case, please go away. > >It can interest lawyers all you want, but for the threatening and posturing >we've seen from you, I've yet to actually hear from anyone that you've sued >them, let alone that you won some money. > >D > > >At 05:26 PM 11/22/99 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote: > >>We're up to 80K and rising. 2 big ones. Some smaller ones over 5K. Most >>the rest are under $500. Unless we can pin them to one or a small group of >>people. Then all their attacks are summed. A number of small attacks over >>a short period can then be criminal. This amount interests both lawyers >>and collections companies. >> >> --Dean >> >>Around 04:07 PM 11/22/1999 -0600, rumor has it that Joe Shaw said: >> > >> >What "legitimate business purposes" necessitate leaving SMTP relays open >> >to the world? While I think spammers shouldn't be spamming, I think >> >you'd find it better to do what you can to stop them from spamming via >> >means you control, i.e. your servers, as opposed to going through the >> >FBI. >> > >> >The FBI has recently stated that their computer crimes people are entirely >> >overworked and way behind. So, while they will look into the matter, my >> >previous experience with the FBI and computer crime shows a decided lack >> >of interest in crimes that don't involve a high dollar figure for damages >> >or stolen goods/services except for the purposes of profiling attacks and >> >doing trend analysis. Unless you're looking at a six figure loss, you >> >probably won't get far. >> > >> >Your best bet is to find a solution to restrict access to your relays. >> > >> >-- >> >Joseph W. Shaw - jshaw(a)insync.net >> >Free UNIX advocate - "I hack, therefore I am." >> > >> >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dean Anderson wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> These are coming from Mass, Cleveland, Ohio, and Virginia. >> >> >> >> We use our relays for legitimate business purposes. They are not >> "accidentally left open". >> >> >> >> --Dean >> > >> > >> > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com >> LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Re: ARIN whois
by Dean Anderson 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

Same fees apply. --Dean Around 10:53 PM 11/22/1999 +0000, rumor has it that Patrick Evans said: > >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Derek J. Balling wrote: > >> >> No offense to all, but you are ALL wasting your time trying to >> convince Dean through logic on this topic. We've all been round >> and round the same discussions on the anti-spam mailing lists, and >> Dean continues to insist that he MUST run open relays. >> >Marvellous! We've got a load of customers who seem to refuse to use >their ISP's relays when sending mail, and because we're a hosting >company and not an IAP we obviously can't let them use ours without >jumping through hoops (a la pop3/smtp, or constructing an ACL of >every ISP they might happen to use...erm...yeh, maybe I won't do >that then). > >Dean, can I have a list of your open relays? We'll whack in an RR that >suggests they're ours (not in the headers, of course), and point our >customers at those! You're a lifesaver! > >-- >Patrick Evans - Sysadmin, bran addict and couch potato >pre at pre dot org www.pre.org/pre > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean(a)av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0