- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Dampening on Juniper routers
by John Fraizer 10 Dec '00

10 Dec '00

Can anyone relate any information with regards to how Juniper routers differ from Cisco in respect to BGP dampening? We are seeing issues with one of our peers who is using an M20. If the BGP session is cycled, that peer is damping our routes for aprox 1hr. We don't have this problem with any other peers, all of whom are using Cisco products. There has to be some huge difference in the way that the Juniper is calculating the penalty and decay. Any help is greatly appreciated. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc

2 1

MCI outage in Wy.
by BillT＠Mahagonny.com 09 Dec '00

09 Dec '00

Has anyone heard any details on the MCI outage in Wyoming? I've heard that they lost over 20 OC-48s that were connecting the west coast. I still have a number of sites down, but I'm not going to hassle them for status. That must have been one big backhoe. -- BillT(a)Mahagonny.com | PGP KeyID#: 0xECB1EE6F -By the year 2019, one third of the worlds population will be Elvis impersonators.

1 0

Re: Akamai..
by Avi Freedman 09 Dec '00

09 Dec '00

In article <100119.55819.13043(a)avi.netaxs.com> you wrote: : Anyone know what's up (well..what's down) with Akamai?... Avi? Anyone? : Matt Nothing down that I'm aware of with Akamai or its customers... Avi

2 1

Akamai..
by Matt Levine 09 Dec '00

09 Dec '00

Anyone know what's up (well..what's down) with Akamai?... Avi? Anyone? Matt -- Matt Levine, CTO <mlevine(a)efront.com> eFront Media, Inc. - http://www.efront.com Phone: +1 714 428 8500 ext. 504 Fax : +1 949 203 2156 ICQ : 17080004

1 0

RE: Interliant and Digex
by Adrian OCampo 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

You guys may want to try Webperfect.com. Heard good things about them. -----Original Message----- From: Kai Schlichting [mailto:kai@pac-rim.net] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 1:57 PM To: LBolton(a)geiger.com; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Interliant and Digex Importance: High At Friday 01:39 PM 12/8/00, LBolton(a)geiger.com wrote: >My company is considering using either Interliant or Digex for Web Hosting. >Any opinions of either company would be appreciated. > >Please feel free to respond privately. > >Many thanks in advance. > >Lars Bolton >lbolton(a)geiger.com If you like to do business with spammers - go ahead. I am getting REALLY sick and tired of Interliant stealing contact information from the NSI whois database and printing them on postcards for postal spam (and I sure as hell didn't give NSI any permission whatsoever in selling my contact info ; I know, they've been selling it lately; whether I want their spam or not is ultimately InterLIARs concern though). As far as as ethics standards for Digex/Intermedia is concerned, my mind is clouded right now, but Interliant will never find consideration at places where I am at the helm. That same behavior has cost Savvis some substantial contract(s) this year, from DSL lines over T1's to a DS-3, new ones and extensions alike. Names not omitted to blame the guilty. -- "Just say No" to Spam Kai Schlichting New York, Palo Alto, You name it Sophisticated Technical Peon Kai's SpamShield <tm> is FREE! http://www.SpamShield.org | | LeasedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-UnixAdmin-Security-ReallyHardMath

1 0

The Cidr Report
by Tony Bates 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Dec 8 12:00:00 PST 2000 It is not checked before it leaves my workstation. However, hopefully you will find this report interesting and will take the time to look through this to see if you can improve the amount of aggregation you perform. The report is split into sections: 0) General Status List the route table history for the last week, list any possibly bogus routes seen and give some status on ASes. 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level This lists the "Top 30" players who if they decided to aggregate their announced classful prefixes at the origin AS level could make a significant difference in the reduction of the current size of the Internet routing table. This calculation does not take into account the inclusion of holes when forming an aggregate so it is possible even larger reduction should be possible. 2) Weekly Delta A summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does give some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. Clearly, it is generally a good thing to see a large amont of withdrawls. 3) Interesting aggregates Interesting here means not an aggregate made as a set of classful routes. Thanks to xara.net for giving me access to their routing tables once a day. Please send any comments about this report directly to me. Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html for a daily update of this report. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CIDR REPORT for 08Dec00 0) General Status Table History ------------- Date Prefixes 011200 93154 021200 93136 031200 93184 041200 95348 051200 95118 061200 95808 071200 95387 081200 95404 Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr.plot.html for a plot of the table history. Possible Bogus Routes --------------------- *** Bogus 91.16.23.0/24 from AS11770 *** Bogus 219.219.219.0 from AS2563 AS Summary ---------- Number of ASes in routing system: 9339 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix: 5413 (3047 cidr, 2366 classful) Largest number of cidr routes: 1001 announced by AS701 Largest number of classful routes: 1708 announced by AS1221 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level --- 08Dec00 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS1221 1708 1240 468 27.4% TELSTRA-AS AS2563 348 114 234 67.2% KoRean Education Network AS271 289 133 156 54.0% BCnet Backbone AS701 1534 1390 144 9.4% Alternet AS9269 167 48 119 71.3% Hong Kong CTI AS7545 166 50 116 69.9% TPG Internet Pty Ltd AS2609 115 11 104 90.4% EUnet-TN AS6595 164 63 101 61.6% DODDSEUR AS8013 453 353 100 22.1% PSINET-CA AS7657 285 194 91 31.9% The Internet Group Limited AS13999 94 6 88 93.6% UNKNOWN AS705 331 247 84 25.4% ALTERNET-AS AS4293 344 262 82 23.8% Internal ASN for C&W AS174 526 445 81 15.4% Performance Systems International AS4755 194 114 80 41.2% Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. India AS7496 102 25 77 75.5% Power Up AS7046 326 250 76 23.3% UUNET-CUSTOMER AS4151 285 209 76 26.7% USDA Internet Access Network AS3908 238 166 72 30.3% Supernet, Inc. AS1942 136 64 72 52.9% FR-CICG-GRENOBLE AS577 243 172 71 29.2% Bell Backbone AS724 224 158 66 29.5% DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS AS7018 594 528 66 11.1% AT&T WorldNet Service Backbone AS226 169 104 65 38.5% USC/Information Sciences Institut AS5106 101 37 64 63.4% AADS-COLUMBUS AS1727 153 91 62 40.5% MRMS-WEST AS3749 116 56 60 51.7% TECNET AS3602 306 248 58 19.0% Sprint Canada Inc. AS2548 369 311 58 15.7% DIGEX-AS AS16758 63 6 57 90.5% UNKNOWN For the rest of the previous weeks gain information please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html 2) Weekly Delta Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report 3) Interesting aggregates Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report

1 0

Interliant and Digex
by LBolton＠geiger.com 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

My company is considering using either Interliant or Digex for Web Hosting. Any opinions of either company would be appreciated. Please feel free to respond privately. Many thanks in advance. Lars Bolton lbolton(a)geiger.com

2 1

assistance with Lucent/Ascend MAX/TNT, 100M ethernet and radius
by Jim Mercer 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

i wonder if anyone else out there has any of these beasts, and have managed to make use of the ethernet-3 card? i'm having hideous problems, and lucent just ain't what ascend used to be. offlist replies appreciated. -- [ Jim Mercer jim(a)reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ] [ Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood ] [ Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code. ]

1 0

RE: California power - its cold, its dark
by Roeland Meyer 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

Thanks for the links guys. Now, here's the summary. 1) California power load is still 10,000 MW below peak delivery of last Summer. 2) Slightly over 1/3 of the generation plants are down for "maintenance". 3) There was an unplanned 500 KW outage, which was compensated for by shuting down the pumps of the California Aquaduct sytem temporarily. 1) Blame is being placed on the early and extra cold winter. However, a quick perusal of the Farmers Almanac shows that this is expected and no surprise, or shouldn't be. 2) The REAL blame probably rests on the head of the yahoo that allowed so many plants to go on scheduled maintenance at the same time. 3) Shutting down the aquaduct is real bad. Some of Bill Mullholland's design depends on siphon effect and if the siphon breaks it takes weeks of massive power usage in order to resore it. Ergo, they can't shut it down too long or it'll cost too much power to bring it back up. Leaving it down isn't an option, too many people depend on that water. It's looking more like a management screw-up and more people are begining to realize it. The deregulators were so busy deregulating that future usage planning was foregone. Forcing the local utilities to sell off their generators may not have been very smart either. Current power capacity scheduling was also bungled. The timing can only be either gross incompetance or Machiavallien cunning. Thank you all for the additional links. I was actually researching this since a few days ago. Some of us are preparing grounds for suit, independently, in the event that they start long rolling black-outs. We have six-hours worth of bats, so we should be okay. But, our clients don't. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Stratton [mailto:nathan@robotics.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:47 PM > To: Sean Donelan > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: California power - its cold, its dark > > > > On 7 Dec 2000, Sean Donelan wrote: > > > Approximately one-third of California's power generating capacitiy > > is off-line. The California system operator has called a "stage 3" > > power alert, requiring *interruptiable* customers be interrupted > > until 10pm tonight. They are not instituting rotating blackouts > > of other customers at this time. > > Any word on the cause of the outage, did several reactors scram at the > same time or is this a transmission issue? > > ><> > Nathan Stratton CTO, Exario > Networks, Inc. > nathan(a)robotics.net nathan(a)exario.net > http://www.robotics.net http://www.exario.net > >

5 5

California power - its cold, its dark
by Sean Donelan 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

Approximately one-third of California's power generating capacitiy is off-line. The California system operator has called a "stage 3" power alert, requiring *interruptiable* customers be interrupted until 10pm tonight. They are not instituting rotating blackouts of other customers at this time.

3 2