- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

NANOG 45 PGP signing party.
by Joel Jaeggli 01 Jan '09

01 Jan '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a quick note, The thrice annual NANOG pgp key signing party will be making an appearance at NANOG 45. The keysigning sessions are going to be during the morning breaks during the general session, and will be location TDB. Monday January 26th 11:00-11:30 Tuesday January 27th 11:00-11:30 If you plan to participate, please add your key to the keyring at: https://biglumber.com/x/web?keyring=9210 Then come to one or both sessions with some form of government issued photo ID. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me via email or corner one of the people with the pgp signing dots since they mostly know the score. While printouts will probably be available at the sessions, feel free to add your key to the keyring right up to the time of the last keysigning event. Thanks Joel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkldCqwACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrKoQACfSgOEzqbSplmCyKPmhc6Y13fu M3AAn1ZcEXMCqLvu0c7TAyDpjSuWLoIZ =Ie47 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Hijacking and Tools BOF Nanog 45 - Call for participants
by Joel Jaeggli 01 Jan '09

01 Jan '09

Greetings and happy new year, As Nanog 45 is quickly approaching, I would encourage anyone who has been thinking about the problem of address hijacking and mitigation within the framework of our existing routing system to consider participating in the Hijack and Tools BOF at, in Santo Domingo. We have sufficient space in the agenda for the Sunday afternoon BOF to accommodate some additional participants. Discussions from both tools developers and operators with deployment experience with opsen-source or commercial tools are encouraged, as well as filtering policy, strategy for communicating with peer network operators to coordinate response and related topics within the sphere of ip hijacking response. Thanks and Looking forward to seeing you all in Santo Domingo. Joel

1 0

Re: Leap second tonight
by Peter Lothberg 31 Dec '08

31 Dec '08

INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION AND REFERENCE SYSTEMS SERVICE (IERS) SERVICE INTERNATIONAL DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE ET DES SYSTEMES DE REFERENCE SERVICE DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE OBSERVATOIRE DE PARIS 61, Av. de l'Observatoire 75014 PARIS (France) Tel. : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 26 FAX : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 91 e-mail : services.iers(a)obspm.fr http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc Paris, 4 July 2008 Bulletin C 36 To authorities responsible for the measurement and distribution of time UTC TIME STEP on the 1st of January 2009 A positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2008. The sequence of dates of the UTC second markers will be: 2008 December 31, 23h 59m 59s 2008 December 31, 23h 59m 60s 2009 January 1, 0h 0m 0s The difference between UTC and the International Atomic Time TAI is: from 2006 January 1, 0h UTC, to 2009 January 1 0h UTC : UTC-TAI = - 33s from 2009 January 1, 0h UTC, until further notice : UTC-TAI = - 34s Leap seconds can be introduced in UTC at the end of the months of December or June, depending on the evolution of UT1-TAI. Bulletin C is mailed every six months, either to announce a time step in UTC or to confirm that there will be no time step at the next possible date. Daniel GAMBIS Head Earth Orientation Center of IERS Observatoire de Paris, France

1 0

Failover solution using BGP
by Naveen Nathan 31 Dec '08

31 Dec '08

Hi, I would appreciate insight and experience for the following situation. I have a client that would like to announce a /18 & /19 over BGP in Sacramento and LA, us being the second location in LA. Our location will be a failover location incase Sacramento goes down. They want failover for extreme cases when they're completly down in Sacramento. They have strict requirements so that traffic to their blocks should exclusively go to Sacramento or LA. This seems difficult to automate and they are aware of this. They will contact their provider to stop announcing the blocks and subsequently contact us to announce their routes. I am wondering is there a better way to approaching the situation without resorting to announcing the routes when the client calls us and tells us to failover. This seems to be the inherent problem aswell because the customer wants this to be a manual process. -- Naveen Nathan To understand the human mind, understand self-deception. - Anon

11 13

Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
by David Freedman 31 Dec '08

31 Dec '08

>For IS-IS, highly recommend MT to avoid any nasties while >turning up v6 in a dual-stack environment. Also when doing MT on cisco, configure "no-adjacency-check" under the v6 address-family during the migrate else you will bounce your sessions. Cisco of course warn you against doing this but without it the change is bumpy. >From the cisco docs: "Disabling the adjacency-check command can adversely affect your network configuration. Enter the no adjacency-check command only when you are running IPv4 IS-IS on all your routers and you want to add IPv6 IS-IS to your network but you need to maintain all your adjacencies during the transition. When the IPv6 IS-IS configuration is complete, remove the no adjacency-check command from the configuration." source: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-is-is.html ------------------------------------------------ David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Limited http://www.clara.net

1 0

Youtube contact
by Simon Allard 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Hi, Can someone from Youtube/Google please contact me off list, I have a strange routing issue at the youtube->cogent border. Usual contact methods have failed me. Thanks Regards Simon

2 1

ARIN receives 2 new /8 blocks
by Member Services 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

ARIN received the IPv4 address blocks 108.0.0.0/8 and 184.0.0.0/8 from the IANA on Dec. 22, 2008. We will begin making allocations of /20 and shorter prefixes from these blocks in the near future in accordance with ARIN's minimum allocation policy. Network operators may wish to adjust any filters in place accordingly. For informational purposes, a list of ARIN's currently administered IP address blocks can be found at: http://www.arin.net/reference/ip_blocks.html Regards, Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)

1 0

E-Bay / Paypal engineer eyeballs required.
by Stephen Fulton 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

Apologies to the list for the post, but: Could an engineer from E-Bay/Paypal contact me off-list, as we're having some difficulty reaching your network. Our ARIN assigned space (66.135.96.0/19) is awfully close to your own, and I suspect a typo. We have no issues reaching the edge of your space via multiple carriers. -- Stephen Fulton

1 0

Level 3 issues
by marco 29 Dec '08

29 Dec '08

is anyone having issues with Level3?

25 39

Tata / AS6453.net peering admin?
by Mike Lyon 29 Dec '08

29 Dec '08

Please hit me up offlist. I've been having issues with your peering with China Netcom and your NOC is unresponsive. Thanks, Mike

1 0