- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses)
by Tim Franklin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

> About the only hack I can see that *might* make sense would be that > home CPE does NOT honour the upstream lifetimes if upstream > connectivity is lost, but instead keeps the prefix alive on very > short lifetimes until upstream connectivity returns. Yep, that's the hack I was getting at. As a non-technical end-user, once my CPE has got a prefix from my ISP and advertised it to the devices on my LAN, the same prefix should keep working until: -my ISP assigns a different one -the end of time whichever comes first :) Having my PC not be able to talk to my printer any more because my DSL / cable / wimax / whatever has been down for "too long" is not acceptable. Regards, Tim.

2 1

Equinix of Candia?
by Ryan Finnesey 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Who if anyone is the Equinix of Candia? Cheers Ryan

5 7

RE: Equinix of Candia?
by Ryan Finnesey 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Yes sorry it has been a long day. Canada. Is the only Switch & Data center in Toronto? -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Karch [mailto:kevinkarch@vackinc.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 9:16 PM To: 'David DiGiacomo' Cc: Ryan Finnesey Subject: RE: Equinix of Candia? We do have several carriers at that location. Please send your space, upstream and connectivity requirements and we will prepare a quote for you. Thank you, Kevin L. Karch Network Specialist Direct: 847-833-8810 Fax: 847-985-5550 Email: kevinkarch(a)vackinc.com Web: www.vackinc.com The Optical Network Specialists -----Original Message----- From: David DiGiacomo [mailto:davidd@corp.nac.net] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:02 PM To: David DiGiacomo Cc: Ryan Finnesey; NANOG list Subject: Re: Equinix of Candia? ...somehow my email got cutoff Equinix is in 151 Front Street in Torono Sent from my iPhone On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:59 PM, "David DiGiacomo" <davidd(a)corp.nac.net> wrote: > If you mean Canada, Equinix bought out Switch & Data so Equinix is directly > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:04 PM, "Ryan Finnesey" <ryan.finnesey(a)HarrierInvestments.com> wrote: > >> Who if anyone is the Equinix of Candia? >> >> Cheers >> Ryan >> >> >

1 0

[NANOG-announce] Registration is open for NANOG 51 in Miami
by Steve Feldman 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

Registration is now open for the 51st Meeting of the North American Network Operators' Group. NANOG 51 will be held January 30 through February 2, 2011, at the InterContinental Miami on Biscayne Bay. The meeting will be hosted by Terremark. See http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog51 for complete meeting details, and follow the important links on the left to submit presentations, register, and reserve your hotel room. Please note there are tiered rates for registration, so plan to register early to take advantage of the best rate. If you need lodging, plan to make your reservation early to guarantee a room in the conference hotel. NANOG has an excellent room rate that also includes complimentary in-room Internet access. The group rate will expire on January 16 or when filled. See you in sunny Miami this winter! Steve Feldman NANOG Steering Committee Chair _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses)
by Tim Franklin 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

> This isn't to do with anything low level like RAs. This is about > people proposing every IPv6 end-site gets PI i.e. a default free zone > with multiple billions of routes instead of using ULAs for internal, > stable addressing. It's as though they're not aware that the majority > of end-sites on the Internet are residential ones, and that PI can > scale to that number of end-sites. I can't see any other way to > interpret "we ought to make getting PI easy, easy enough that the > other options just don't make sense". OK, sorry, I think we're addressing different points of the same comment. I was looking very much at the second half of "all residential users get PI so that if their ISP disappears their network doesn't break", ie the reason *why* they'd want PI. I assumed that was "disappears" as in "has an outage", rather than goes bust, user changes ISP etc - and if you've only got one ISP, you don't need PI or ULA to have *local* connectivity work through an ISP outage. I agree, on the current routing platforms we have, PI for every end site is insanity. Whether we should be looking for routing platforms (or a different architecture - LISP?) that allows PI for every end user is a different question... Regards, Tim.

1 0

datacenter traffic distribution
by paljak＠mit.bme.hu 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

Hi, I'm wondering if there's a reliable and public survey, statistics about the distribution of datacenter (or cloud, if you wish) traffic, according to protocols or traffic types? E.g. the share of iscsi/fcoe/etc in storage, or the share of TCP/UDP, and so on. For general, Internet traffic, i've found several, for example: - Cisco Visual Networking Index, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705 /ns827/white_paper_c11-481360_ns827_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.ht ml - Arbor Networks survey, http://www.arbornetworks.com/en/arbor-networks-the-university-of-michig an-and-merit-network-to-present-two-year-study-of-global-int-2.html I'd be interested in seeing something similar for datacenter traffic, for research purposes. Thanks for you help in advance, Gergely -- Gergely Paljak

1 0

Clarification from Pica8 (was Fwd: Mystery open source switching company claims top-of-rack price edge)
by Christopher LILJENSTOLPE 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

I just talked to Lin Du (who I worked with when I was at Woven), who is the current CEO of Pica8. Don't know anything about the product, but this didn't seem like Lin's style. Turns out Fontaine GUILLAUME has registered pic8.org(a)gmail.com, has no relation to the company - and is trying to prove to them that he should be a reseller. Lin has told GUILLAUME to stop (not that that will do any good). Some e-mail fragments below. Chris Begin forwarded message: > From: "Lin Du" <ldu(a)pica8.com> > Date: 01 November 2010 17.11.58 +1100 > To: "Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" <cdl(a)asgaard.org> > Subject: Re: Mystery open source switching company claims top-of-rack price edge > > Hi, Chris, > > Thanks for your reminding. > This guy wants to resell the Pronto products but without any partnership with us yet. > He even registered an email with my name as Pica8.org(a)gmail.com for posting. > > I sent another email to let him stop doing this anymore. I need to clarify NANOG for this. > Thanks, > > Lin > > > > From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:31 PM > To: Lin Du > Subject: Re: Mystery open source switching company claims top-of-rack price edge > > > NP. > > > Chris > > > On 01Nov2010, at 15.30, Lin Du wrote: > > > Chris, > > Many thanks. > > Guillaume, > Please stop using pica8 name in your posts, emails and any other public messages. We didn't grant you to do in this way. > You could be pica8 partner until you are legally qualified. > Thanks, > > Lin > Pica8 Technology Inc. > <snip>

3 2

Bandwidth into Haiti
by Marshall Eubanks 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

Can anyone update me on the status of fiber bandwidth into Haiti ? Has the landing station been repaired yet after last years earthquake ? Regards Marshall Eubanks

3 2

Optical Wireless
by james edwards 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

I am looking for some vendors that make PtP optical wireless (laser) gear. I have a project where I have to link 2 buildings separated by a 5 lane road. Buildings are at least 10 stories high. Multiple reasons why RF (WiFi) or fiber under the street will not work, plus some layer 8 issues. I need 100 mbs, Ethernet is the protocol transported. PoE would be nice but not a show stopper. Anyone have experience with this kind of gear and can suggest a vendor ? Thanks, -- James H. Edwards Network Systems Administrator Judicial Information Division jedwards(a)nmcourts.gov

6 6

Management , Provisioning , Fault detection and management for ISPs?
by Gustavo Santos 31 Oct '10

31 Oct '10

Hi, I´m looking for some books, best common pratices and stuff like that for ISPs. We have an ISP that´s having a fast growth and we´re having some problems because lack of procedures. For an example two days ago we have a broadcast storm that coused a lot of problem and was harsh to find who is causing that issue , couse one of our clients made a self install ( not authorized in one of our multipoint access point) and somehow caused a loop. we have some types of circuit delivery to our customers like point to point licensed microwave , t1/e1 , fiber optic, and point to multipoint wireless. How you large ISPs deal with that kind of problem or that´s never happen becouse all your circuits are delivered in a private vlan, qinq, serial interfaces, point to point ? Thanks! -- Gustavo Santos Analista de Redes CCNA , MTCNA , JUNCIA-ER

1 0