- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

T-Mobile Debuts Novel Network Management with GoSmart
by Jay Ashworth 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

Check this out. Cheers, -- jra http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11956 This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com) The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.

1 0

FCC Commits to Opening Up More 5GHz Airwaves
by Jay Ashworth 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

Might this solve the "10MB problem" discussed on NANOG? Cheers, -- jra http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11953 This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com) The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.

3 5

Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
by Scott Weeks 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

Be sure to read the source: intelreport.mandiant.com/Mandiant_APT1_Report.pdf I'm only part way through, but I find it hard to believe that only micro$loth computers are used as the attack OS. Maybe I haven't gotten far enough through report to find the part where they use the *nix boxes? scott

3 2

TelePacific a good choice?
by Jeff Harper 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

Hiya, We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our transit needs. If you have an honest experience with them, positive or negative, I'd like to hear from you. Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks! Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) | www.well.com ip access-list extended jeff permit tcp any any eq intelligence deny tcp any any eq stupid-people

4 3

Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
by Scott Weeks 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

>I'm only part way through, but I find it hard to believe that >only micro$loth computers are used as the attack OS. Maybe I --- calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net wrote: From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net> <snipped> :: when all tools are available for windows os, you just have to compile them. <sniped out the rest> ------------------------------------------------- From: Scott Weeks <surfer(a)mauigateway.com> ::: They're not all available for m$. --- wbailey(a)satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: From: Warren Bailey <wbailey(a)satelliteintelligencegroup.com> They are when you have a college full of programmers. -------------------------------------------------- Please elaborate. I didn't follow that. scott

5 4

Check this out T-Mobile Launches GoSmart Prepaid Service Nationally on Phone Scoop
by Jay Ashworth 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

Check this out: http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946 This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com) The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.

8 8

Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
by Scott Weeks 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

--- calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net wrote: From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net> It was just an example :-) to point out the scale of developers vs operators. -------------------------------------------- :: You'd be surprised at how much better brains are than brawn :: on these things... ;-) --- wbailey(a)satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: Have you been to The Great Wall? That statement does not apply in the PRC. ---------------------------------------------------- It would be interesting, I suppose, to see what can massively parallel better. brains or brawn :) That's what I'm saying. If this is done by m$ toolage only, as the report seems to say, on page 4, for example: "817 of the 832 (98%) IP addresses logging into APT1 controlled systems using Remote Desktop resolved back to China." Then they have missed the more interesting part of the puzzle, I believe. scott ps. If you gottem both, well that's a whole other thingie.

1 0

Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
by Scott Weeks 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

--- calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net wrote: From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net> It was just an example :-) to point out the scale of developers vs operators. -------------------------------------------- You'd be surprised at how much better brains are than brawn on these things... ;-) scott

2 1

Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
by Scott Weeks 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

--- calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net wrote: From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net> IMO, if we stick to the document and they are organized in military style, then a person who collect information, should focus only on that particular phase. That person is an operator, he or she should not be keep busy remembering long CLI commands. The scope is to deliver ASAP. ----------------------------------------- What's that randy says? >;-) I can only hope you're right, but my point was to bring suspicion to the report itself for (possibly; I'm only on page 19) saying that m$ is the only attacking OS. -------------------------------------- No matter how much I like CLI and to put my fingers into text mode, I have to admit that point and click in windows is an easier and faster method to achieve the task I did mention. As Warren mention, --------------------------------------- bzzzzzt. Wrong answer. Please study more. Next! scott

1 0

Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
by Scott Weeks 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

--- calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net wrote: From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean(a)secdisk.net> <snipped> :: when all tools are available for windows os, you just have to compile them. <sniped out the rest> ------------------------------------------------- They're not all available for m$. scott ---- On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:02:35 +0100 Scott Weeks wrote ---- >Be sure to read the source: > >intelreport.mandiant.com/Mandiant_APT1_Report.pdf > >I'm only part way through, but I find it hard to believe that >only micro$loth computers are used as the attack OS. Maybe I >haven't gotten far enough through report to find the part >where they use the *nix boxes?

3 4