- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

UN Secretariat building in nyc
by Chris McDonald 26 Apr '13

26 Apr '13

Hi all: Does anyone have a creative (read - fast) way of getting from the mmr there to 60 Hudson ? TIA, Chris @ PCCW

3 3

It's Friday
by Michael Painter 26 Apr '13

26 Apr '13

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/514066/what-happened-when-one-man-ping…

1 0

Alleged BTOP/NTIA Fraud - $25M lawsuit filed over BTOP/NTIA funds in Florida
by Himilean Media 26 Apr '13

26 Apr '13

Wondering if this lawsuit has or will potentially affect any other NANOG operators? My understanding is that anyone that was counting (planning) on this infrastructure in rural Florida for middle-mile or long-haul transport should now seek alternative options? -HM/DAK On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:52 PM, FierceTelecom wrote: > > Rapid Systems Seeks $25 Million From FRBA With Lawsuit Filing > > Tampa, Florida based Rapid Systems, Inc. announced April 19 it filed a $25 > Million suit against the Florida Rural Broadband Alliance (FRBA) along with > several co-defendants. > > Rapid Systems is a wireless broadband Internet service provider that > entered an agreement with FRBA and others to provide broadband network > support for a project developed with Broadband Opportunities Grants awarded > in Florida as part of a government economic stimulus program. The grant > totaled $23 Million. Rapid Systems allege in the complaint that after > providing the agreed services, equipment and in-kind contributions totaling > $2 Million, the FRBA and several co-defendants failed to pay Rapid Systems > for any of the services or expenses rendered under the agreement. Rapid > Systems is seeking to recover not only its own investment but also fees, > costs and lost revenue as a result of FRBA's actions. > > The grant money FRBA received is intended to develop the infrastructure > needed for wireless Internet service in rural Florida counties. The program > is intended to bridge the gap between large public service providers and > small and often poor rural communities without the economic impact to > attract private investment for wireless broadband connectivity networks. > > A similar program was already funded as the North Florida Broadband > Authority and has seen similar litigation and various towns and counties > pulling out of the program. After three years and over $28 Million federal > dollars invested in the NFBA, there are a confirmed 60 customers using the > services. Both the NFBA and RFBA are currently under federal investigation. > Questions of mismanagement, fraud, misinformation and misappropriating > funds have dogged the grant recipients almost since their inception early > in the Obama administration’s economic recovery efforts. > > Rapid Systems has also included some public official in its complaint > alleging a coordinated effort with the FRBA to defame the plaintiff in an > effort to justify not paying the outstanding balances. The lawsuit filed in > Hardee County Circuit Court details a complicated “fraud scheme” > perpetrated by FRBA’s management to keep from paying out various invoices > and accounts. Rapid Systems has told the court all contracted work was > performed to agreed standards and payment is now due. > > There was no immediate word from the court or federal authorities if the > Rapid Systems suit will, in any way, affect the ongoing investigation into > the FRBA or NFBA. Also, federal authorities have offered no confirmed time > frame for completing their investigation. Whether the federal investigation > could impact Rapid Systems and their alleged claims remains unclear. > > Source Lawsuit: > http://cdn.l2net.com/dl/BTOP_NTIA_FRBA_Lawsuit_KraigBeahnCopy_FSReduced.pdf > > FierceTelecom: > http://www.fiercetelecom.com/story/florida-provider-rapid-systems-inc-sues-… > > >

1 0

RE: IPv6 and HTTPS
by Harry Hoffman 26 Apr '13

26 Apr '13

1 0

Comcast NOC - issues to/from AS13331 (Seattle)
by Michael Loftis 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Comcast doesn't appear to have any usable NOC contacts via whois, and this issue is apparently very widespread. Comcast obviously has multiple saturated paths out in this area, so if you're seeing issues getting to your customers on Comcast...well, it's probably Comcast. Sort of an ongoing/me too on last months thread about same... Outbound traffic to Comcast via basically any of our (AS13331) upstreams except Spectrum (AS11404) is experiencing very high packet loss once inside Comcast's network, we suspect a router or link very near to us in Seattle is failing. I've marked out the destination customer IPs but they're available to Comcast engineers if they get in touch with me directly or as noc(a)metapeer.com -- TIA -- and again, sorry to the list. Below are three failing/high loss traces, and then same three traces from our other DC which is routing out via spectrum. The loss is present on Cogent and L3 outgoing paths at the least, maybe others. As of now I've routed around the problem point for via the good path. fission:~# mtr -s 900 --report --report-cycles 30 1.2.3.4 fission.myfreecams.com Snt: 30 Loss% Last Avg Best Wrst StDev ve75-gw1-xmr.metapeer.com 0.0% 0.4 1.4 0.3 11.8 2.9 te0-7-0-15.ccr21.sea02.atlas.cogentco.com 0.0% 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.1 te-0-5-0-3-pe03.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 6.7% 43.7 42.3 38.8 43.7 1.4 be-13-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 3.3% 47.7 44.6 41.3 47.7 1.8 pos-0-7-0-0-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net 3.3% 69.4 68.7 65.0 71.3 1.5 he-5-15-0-0-cr01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast 6.7% 92.6 97.3 91.4 102.0 3.8 he-3-15-0-0-ar01.woburn.ma.boston.comcast.ne 10.0% 120.3 119.8 116.3 122.0 1.8 pos-0-1-0-0-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.n 0.0% 122.0 120.5 117.1 123.9 1.8 po-80-ur01.deering.nh.boston.comcast.net 0.0% 121.4 121.3 118.3 133.8 2.8 po-21-ur01.concord.nh.boston.comcast.net 6.7% 119.6 130.1 119.3 272.8 31.8 te-1-0-0-ten01.concord.nh.boston.comcast.net 6.7% 118.7 120.0 117.6 121.4 1.3 ??? 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root fission:~# mtr -s 900 --report --report-cycles 30 5.6.7.8 fission.myfreecams.com Snt: 30 Loss% Last Avg Best Wrst StDev ve75-gw1-xmr.metapeer.com 0.0% 0.3 0.6 0.3 5.2 0.9 te0-7-0-15.ccr21.sea02.atlas.cogentco.com 0.0% 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.1 te-0-5-0-3-pe03.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 41.4 42.6 38.5 43.8 1.3 be-13-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 45.6 44.1 40.4 46.7 1.8 pos-0-8-0-0-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net 6.7% 71.2 69.0 65.0 72.1 1.9 he-5-12-0-0-cr01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast 3.3% 98.1 96.3 86.4 101.2 3.9 he-0-15-0-0-ar01.pontiac.mi.michigan.comcast 10.0% 93.5 97.3 93.5 100.6 2.3 xe-11-0-0-0-sur01.rochestrhlls.mi.michigan.c 0.0% 97.2 99.1 92.9 141.8 10.4 te-17-10-cdn05.rochestrhlls.mi.michigan.comc 3.3% 118.9 113.2 104.6 118.9 3.5 ??? 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 fission:~# mtr -s 900 --report --report-cycles 30 a.b.c.d fission.myfreecams.com Snt: 30 Loss% Last Avg Best Wrst StDev ve75-gw1-xmr.metapeer.com 0.0% 0.3 2.1 0.3 47.1 8.6 te0-7-0-15.ccr21.sea02.atlas.cogentco.com 0.0% 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.1 te-0-5-0-3-pe03.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 6.7% 40.6 42.4 39.7 45.2 1.3 be-15-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 47.3 48.2 41.3 54.8 4.3 68.86.92.34 3.3% 43.7 45.5 39.5 101.7 11.6 be-18-ur06.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net 0.0% 43.8 43.0 40.2 44.3 1.4 te-3-0-0-ten15.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.n 6.7% 42.7 44.1 42.1 45.7 1.1 ??? 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 mloftis@phobos:~$ mtr -s 900 --report --report-wide --report-cycles 30 1.2.3.4 HOST: phobos Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 207.229.74.1 0.0% 30 0.4 5.1 0.3 132.4 24.1 2. agg1-sea-t7-8.bb.spectrumnet.us 0.0% 30 1.5 14.0 1.5 206.4 39.8 3. 23.30.206.33 0.0% 30 1.8 2.0 1.7 3.5 0.3 4. be-17-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 30 12.6 5.3 2.1 12.6 2.7 5. pos-0-4-0-0-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 30 28.5 29.2 27.2 31.4 1.3 6. he-5-12-0-0-cr01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 30 49.9 52.2 49.9 56.7 2.8 7. he-3-5-0-0-ar01.woburn.ma.boston.comcast.net 0.0% 30 78.5 79.5 78.3 81.0 1.0 8. pos-1-12-0-0-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net 0.0% 30 80.2 80.1 78.2 81.7 1.1 9. po-80-ur01.deering.nh.boston.comcast.net 0.0% 30 80.0 80.1 79.9 80.4 0.1 10. po-21-ur01.concord.nh.boston.comcast.net 0.0% 30 80.7 85.1 80.7 199.3 21.6 11. te-1-0-0-ten01.concord.nh.boston.comcast.net 0.0% 30 80.5 80.5 80.5 80.7 0.0 12. ??? 100.0 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 mloftis@phobos:~$ mtr -s 900 --report --report-wide --report-cycles 30 5.6.7.8 HOST: phobos Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 207.229.74.1 0.0% 30 0.3 3.6 0.3 96.3 17.5 2. agg1-sea-t7-8.bb.spectrumnet.us 0.0% 30 10.2 10.4 1.5 58.5 15.1 3. 23.30.206.33 0.0% 30 2.4 2.0 1.8 2.4 0.1 4. be-14-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 30 3.6 4.4 1.7 10.6 2.4 5. pos-0-3-0-0-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 30 31.1 29.5 27.2 31.6 1.3 6. he-5-12-0-0-cr01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 30 52.3 55.4 50.3 61.5 3.6 7. he-0-14-0-0-ar01.pontiac.mi.michigan.comcast.net 0.0% 30 58.9 58.0 56.1 60.1 1.2 8. xe-11-0-0-0-sur01.rochestrhlls.mi.michigan.comcast.net 0.0% 30 71.2 58.9 56.6 83.6 6.4 9. te-17-10-cdn05.rochestrhlls.mi.michigan.comcast.net 0.0% 30 71.2 72.6 67.6 78.0 3.2 10. ??? 100.0 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 mloftis@phobos:~$ mtr -s 900 --report --report-wide --report-cycles 30 a.b.c.d HOST: phobos Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 207.229.74.1 0.0% 30 0.7 5.1 0.3 143.4 26.1 2. agg1-sea-t7-8.bb.spectrumnet.us 0.0% 30 1.5 3.1 1.5 30.1 5.6 3. 23.30.206.33 0.0% 30 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.2 0.1 4. be-12-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net 0.0% 30 6.9 5.1 1.7 12.3 3.1 5. 68.86.94.70 0.0% 30 1.8 2.4 1.8 17.3 2.8 6. be-18-ur06.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net 0.0% 30 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.5 0.1 7. te-3-0-0-ten15.bellevue.wa.seattle.comcast.net 0.0% 30 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 0.0 8. ??? 100.0 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 mloftis@phobos:~$ -- "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds." -- Samuel Butler

3 2

UN Secretariat building in nyc
by Chris McDonald 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hi all: Does anyone have a creative (read - fast) way of getting from the mmr there to 60 Hudson ? TIA, Chris @ PCCW

1 0

ScopServ questions
by Steve Bertrand 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hi all, This isn't a NANOG problem, but I'm out of my league on this and am wondering if anyone can contact me off-list or point me in a direction if they can help me resolve an expensive exploit against a branch office asterisk box. Thanks, Steve -- Steve Bertrand AMAYA | Senior Network & Systems Admin Direct Line: +1 403 537-9627 Mobile: +1 403 831-4611 Skype: stevie.bertrand Twitter - Facebook - LinkedIn - YouTube www.amayagaming.com

4 3

UN Secretariat building in nyc
by Chris McDonald 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hi all: Does anyone have a creative (read - fast) way of getting from the mmr there to 60 Hudson ? TIA, Chris @ PCCW

1 0

Fibre patches in the Downtown Chicago area
by Christoph Blecker 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hello NANOG, Wondering if anyone knows of a supplier/warehouse that might have LC/LC single mode fibre patches (2meter or 6feet) in the Chicago area (60661)? Here doing work in a remote office, and the patches shipped were too short. Off-list replies appreciated! Cheers, Christoph

2 1

Re: KVM
by SilverTip257 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:40:32 -0400 > From: Jared Mauch <jared(a)puck.nether.net> > To: shawn wilson <ag4ve.us(a)gmail.com> > Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog(a)nanog.org> > Subject: Re: KVM > Message-ID: <C6B156A1-FBA8-47E6-99D4-22FF3B06DEF5(a)puck.nether.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > On Apr 23, 2013, at 5:36 PM, shawn wilson <ag4ve.us(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm looking at an IP-KVM. I don't need anything high res as I only > > need to see Linux consoles, BIOS, and RAID. What I am looking for: > > Non-Java client that runs on Linux (or a WebUI that will deploy a > > decent RDP or VNC session over SSL). > > Decent/configurable key mappings (ie, I've had a KVM a while ago where > > you had to pull down a menu for F-keys - not cool). > > Decently priced dongles (say ~$100?) > > > > I started looking at the Raritan devices (which can be found really > > cheap on ebay) but I only see a Java client and no mention of > > installing a client on Linux. > > I've used the star tech devices in the past. Most modern systems have > some sort of RDP or Java thing on the IPMI that mostly work. > If your hardware has a Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) or Integrated Lights Out Management (iLOM) that supports IPMI v2 or later use it. IPMI v2 allows for Serial over LAN access [0]. I use SoL with Linux on Dell hardware (BMC) using OpenIPMI tools. You set the BMC to attach to a serial port and have a getty listen on the port as well. On my hardware there's one virtual and one physical serial port so I configure the SoL set up on ttyS1 (second serial) so I don't tie up the physical serial port. You could create similar set ups with serial consoles/terminal servers and servers that have serial ports on them ... have a getty listen on the serial interface. If a terminal/console is enough and you don't need VGA/X-Windows access then SoL or a physical serial connection would suffice. An IP-KVM is not worthless, but why buy more hardware if you have other options? (SoL capability especially) > > - Jared > > > [0] http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/ipmi/ipmi-specifications.html -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //

1 0