Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers
Good news (that i have not personally verified) ! Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T all launched the Samsung Galaxy S6 with IPv6 on by default. Given the growth and importance of mobile to Internet, it is great to see this progress from the mobile carriers. Just for those keeping score, of the top 10 Alexa website for the USA, these major websites prefer IPv6 or prefer NAT44 / NAT64 from the mobile networks 1. Google -- prefers IPv6 2. Facebook -- prefers IPv6 3. Youtube -- prefers IPv6 4. Amazon -- prefers NAT -- :( 5. Yahoo! -- prefers IPv6 6. Wikipedia -- prefers IPv6 7. Twitter -- prefers NAT -- :( 8. Ebay -- prefers NAT -- :( 9. Linkedin -- prefers IPv6 10. Reddit -- prefers NAT -- :( Dear Amazon, Twitter, Ebay, and Reddit -- please consider this your personal invitation to introduce IPv6 to your service.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Amazon, Twitter, Ebay, and Reddit -- please consider this your personal invitation to introduce IPv6 to your service.
good news! it's only really 3 places that need update, since reddit is (still?) an amazon aws customer.
Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6. http://www.reddit.com/r/blog/comments/2ftv08/hell_its_about_time_reddit_now_... (http://www.redditblog.com/2014/09/hell-its-about-time-reddit-now-supports.ht...)
Christopher Morrow <mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com> April 13, 2015 at 5:22 PM
good news! it's only really 3 places that need update, since reddit is (still?) an amazon aws customer. Ca By <mailto:cb.list6@gmail.com> April 13, 2015 at 5:20 PM Good news (that i have not personally verified) !
Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T all launched the Samsung Galaxy S6 with IPv6 on by default.
Given the growth and importance of mobile to Internet, it is great to see this progress from the mobile carriers.
Just for those keeping score, of the top 10 Alexa website for the USA, these major websites prefer IPv6 or prefer NAT44 / NAT64 from the mobile networks
1. Google -- prefers IPv6 2. Facebook -- prefers IPv6 3. Youtube -- prefers IPv6 4. Amazon -- prefers NAT -- :( 5. Yahoo! -- prefers IPv6 6. Wikipedia -- prefers IPv6 7. Twitter -- prefers NAT -- :( 8. Ebay -- prefers NAT -- :( 9. Linkedin -- prefers IPv6 10. Reddit -- prefers NAT -- :(
Dear Amazon, Twitter, Ebay, and Reddit -- please consider this your personal invitation to introduce IPv6 to your service.
On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net> wrote:
Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6.
nice!
Sorry to rain on your parade: dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com. www.reddit.com has no AAAA record
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVLHFDAAoJECOUeeg5xwDmWDEP/RLRI1W8nLDBExnY7jgXd3GS WSfDjyMqjh7vLNLMWaC8oQqdJbFiB+tuafovXIA5xiJJ2+fR5U97DrCuKTt01q7c YP++AmkIMpqbk56Lu4OZDbw3oRid92gnLP5gIudH8RuY1IRPAhveUi1a9DSoPJzx xqudlzKk2mRBWjBldwTO5P5GtmlTWLJZRBPacQtlSCen4OV3xSnkodWId0jAA0dc DBq/i8ha59G5IzBu9WZJg3ktne+MRTlH7YjoeOCXymmpFdAjZ09BZHb2+efVHuji ZP7DJAd29qxeItXTqL/XAiUdg67kb4WNAKEAlviheHFNlef1UlmWw/Of21/V41Nr iebQXJCU6A4gMVnnCg7P1FlMUB3My5p7CwS3rbzDGEJmYDF4FMu0oujO8Sdaa9LP GL1QT7ZkMErm2DrSj3+/HGjanuijS7rtT4lBjIg85g5dyvyTh0YFCELksetLIjn5 J2SDppuiDUc2Ie2+Q5upk1VhOp+j1ERgqfHUiiQTSkuvKjFD+so1mju75aEc6VDT PuQXGEr+lhXfYN1NuuaCGsQStD8f9Amz7qxXDhT8oszncFsu0vrc2KYlGZFAny7w aXFdoCgI9hxlAVGpWTcMV9nY7MMrsQKx/HcnfE4Aeu+4KVK1lN06jszvILc4XCOS PSxb9iAO/AD2j0yfOQiz =EYRU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net> wrote:
Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6.
nice!
Sorry to rain on your parade:
dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com. www.reddit.com has no AAAA record
I think will meant that because: ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.reddit.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.reddit.com. 300 IN A 198.41.208.142 www.reddit.com. 300 IN A 198.41.208.143 ...lots more records... and: NetRange: 198.41.128.0 - 198.41.255.255 CIDR: 198.41.128.0/17 NetName: CLOUDFLARENET that 'clearly' reddit could have cloudflare serve the endpoint from an ipv6 address, and thus populate a AAAA in reddit.com's domain. maybe it's not that simple.
On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
that 'clearly' reddit could have cloudflare serve the endpoint from an ipv6 address, and thus populate a AAAA in reddit.com's domain.
maybe it's not that simple.
Well, it usually really is but just like automation, ipv6 isn’t something that many people have broad experiences with, and don’t cut+paste quite as well as one would hope. There are also *Way* too many people who memorize IP addresses out there that have a harder time trying to store 128-bits in their memory vs 32-bits. They also don’t want to lose track of where that IPv4 packet came from, so don’t want a reverse proxy doing protocol tcp6 -> tcp4 mucking for them. eg: ATT wireless/mobility could have their proxy connect() to an ipv6 address vs ipv4 which my phone transits when on their network and the qname returns AAAA. This was my favorite thing when running a transparent proxy on my home network, it could turn all the traffic from hosts that might not naturally think of doing modprobe ipv6 and turned them into IPv6 requests. For those wondering, nearly 62% of VZ Wireless traffic is IPv6. http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ - Jared
* Jared Mauch (jared@puck.nether.net) wrote:
For those wondering, nearly 62% of VZ Wireless traffic is IPv6.
I'm still wondering when they're going to teach the Verizon FIOS people about the IPv6 goodness... Thanks, Stephen
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
I'm still wondering when they're going to teach the Verizon FIOS people about the IPv6 goodness...
<dead horse tools> probably never as they are different operating companies with different networks and network admins and monetary goals. </dead horse tools>
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Stephen Frost wrote:
I'm still wondering when they're going to teach the Verizon FIOS people about the IPv6 goodness...
I've been barking up that three for nearly the past three years. No definite answers thus far, other than the ONTs deployed in many customer locations might make IPv6 deployment a bit of a PITA, regardless of which model router you have on site. Trying to get good answers on this from VZ sales/marketing contacts through $dayjob has not gotten much in the way of good answers either. I have a v6 tunnel through Hurricane Electric that works very well, but it would be nice to go native. jms
It's my educated guess that much of Verizon's initially FTTH deployment used BPON, and that access gear didn't (and probably will never) support IPv6. So to get IPv6 they need to move the customer to a GPON-enabled access shelf, which apparently requires a new ONT because their initial ONTs were BPON only. Frank -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Justin M. Streiner Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:40 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Stephen Frost wrote:
I'm still wondering when they're going to teach the Verizon FIOS people about the IPv6 goodness...
I've been barking up that three for nearly the past three years. No definite answers thus far, other than the ONTs deployed in many customer locations might make IPv6 deployment a bit of a PITA, regardless of which model router you have on site. Trying to get good answers on this from VZ sales/marketing contacts through $dayjob has not gotten much in the way of good answers either. I have a v6 tunnel through Hurricane Electric that works very well, but it would be nice to go native. jms
On 14 Apr 2015, at 01:59 , Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
For those wondering, nearly 62% of VZ Wireless traffic is IPv6.
to a few select websites (not in term of overall traffic).
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:42:07PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net> wrote:
Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6.
nice!
Sorry to rain on your parade:
dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com. www.reddit.com has no AAAA record
"should be able to serve" != "are serving". - Matt -- If you are a trauma surgeon and someone dies on your table, [...] everyone would know you "did your best". When someone does something truly stupid with their system and it dies and you can't resuscitate it, you must be incompetent or an idiot. -- Julian Macassey, in the Monastery
Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years. Still waiting. Can anyone confirm or deny that Verizon FIOS requires an upgrade to the ONT and router for its "FiOS Quantum" service in order to get IPv6? Joe Klein "Inveniam viam aut faciam" On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:42:07PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net> wrote:
Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6.
nice!
Sorry to rain on your parade:
dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com. www.reddit.com has no AAAA record
"should be able to serve" != "are serving".
- Matt
-- If you are a trauma surgeon and someone dies on your table, [...] everyone would know you "did your best". When someone does something truly stupid with their system and it dies and you can't resuscitate it, you must be incompetent or an idiot. -- Julian Macassey, in the Monastery
On 4/13/15 8:17 PM, Joe Klein wrote:
Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years. Still waiting.
C For those of us of a certain age, I'm wondering: what was the year when you first heard that the entire Internet was going to be switching over to IPv6 Real Soon Now?
I distinctly remember my first time (who ever forgets?). I'm a little hazy on the exact year, but I know it started with a "1". Jim
I don't believe Quantum has any changes relative to the external of the house. Fios has been capable of pushing those speeds with the "old" modem for years. The difference between the old modem and the new one is that the wireless is 802.11n whereas the old one was only capable of g. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On Apr 13, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Joe Klein <jsklein@gmail.com<mailto:jsklein@gmail.com>> wrote: Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years. Still waiting. Can anyone confirm or deny that Verizon FIOS requires an upgrade to the ONT and router for its "FiOS Quantum" service in order to get IPv6? Joe Klein "Inveniam viam aut faciam" On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org<mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:42:07PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists@gmail.com<mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net<mailto:will@willscorner.net>> wrote: Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6. nice! Sorry to rain on your parade: dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com>. www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com> has no AAAA record "should be able to serve" != "are serving". - Matt -- If you are a trauma surgeon and someone dies on your table, [...] everyone would know you "did your best". When someone does something truly stupid with their system and it dies and you can't resuscitate it, you must be incompetent or an idiot. -- Julian Macassey, in the Monastery
The earlier generation of ONT has 100MB Ethernet and MOCA. If you upgrade to Quantum and order speeds > 100MB you'll need an ONT with gig-E and switch from MOCA to wired Ethernet. The MOCA standard specifies up to 175MB, but I don't think MOCA vendors have made any adapters > 100MB. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joel Esler (jesler) Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:17 AM To: Joe Klein Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers I don't believe Quantum has any changes relative to the external of the house. Fios has been capable of pushing those speeds with the "old" modem for years. The difference between the old modem and the new one is that the wireless is 802.11n whereas the old one was only capable of g. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On Apr 13, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Joe Klein <jsklein@gmail.com<mailto:jsklein@gmail.com>> wrote: Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years. Still waiting. Can anyone confirm or deny that Verizon FIOS requires an upgrade to the ONT and router for its "FiOS Quantum" service in order to get IPv6? Joe Klein "Inveniam viam aut faciam" On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org<mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:42:07PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists@gmail.com<mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net<mailto:will@willscorner.net>> wrote: Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6. nice! Sorry to rain on your parade: dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com>. www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com> has no AAAA record "should be able to serve" != "are serving". - Matt -- If you are a trauma surgeon and someone dies on your table, [...] everyone would know you "did your best". When someone does something truly stupid with their system and it dies and you can't resuscitate it, you must be incompetent or an idiot. -- Julian Macassey, in the Monastery
So am I correct in assuming that unless you go >100Mb, and other than the N router to replace the G router, there isn’t anything beneficial? -- Joel Esler Open Source Manager Threat Intelligence Team Lead Talos Group <I reserve the right to be wrong> On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com<mailto:mhuff@ox.com>> wrote: The earlier generation of ONT has 100MB Ethernet and MOCA. If you upgrade to Quantum and order speeds > 100MB you'll need an ONT with gig-E and switch from MOCA to wired Ethernet. The MOCA standard specifies up to 175MB, but I don't think MOCA vendors have made any adapters > 100MB. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joel Esler (jesler) Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:17 AM To: Joe Klein Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers I don't believe Quantum has any changes relative to the external of the house. Fios has been capable of pushing those speeds with the "old" modem for years. The difference between the old modem and the new one is that the wireless is 802.11n whereas the old one was only capable of g. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On Apr 13, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Joe Klein <jsklein@gmail.com<mailto:jsklein@gmail.com><mailto:jsklein@gmail.com>> wrote: Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years. Still waiting. Can anyone confirm or deny that Verizon FIOS requires an upgrade to the ONT and router for its "FiOS Quantum" service in order to get IPv6? Joe Klein "Inveniam viam aut faciam" On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org<mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org><mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:42:07PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists@gmail.com<mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com><mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net<mailto:will@willscorner.net><mailto:will@willscorner.net>> wrote: Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6. nice! Sorry to rain on your parade: dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com><http://www.reddit.com>. www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com><http://www.reddit.com> has no AAAA record "should be able to serve" != "are serving". - Matt -- If you are a trauma surgeon and someone dies on your table, [...] everyone would know you "did your best". When someone does something truly stupid with their system and it dies and you can't resuscitate it, you must be incompetent or an idiot. -- Julian Macassey, in the Monastery
It's much smaller J Other than that, I don't know of anything else. I don't use their router anyway. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 From: Joel Esler (jesler) [mailto:jesler@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:38 AM To: Matthew Huff Cc: Joe Klein; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers So am I correct in assuming that unless you go >100Mb, and other than the N router to replace the G router, there isn't anything beneficial? -- Joel Esler Open Source Manager Threat Intelligence Team Lead Talos Group <I reserve the right to be wrong> On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com<mailto:mhuff@ox.com>> wrote: The earlier generation of ONT has 100MB Ethernet and MOCA. If you upgrade to Quantum and order speeds > 100MB you'll need an ONT with gig-E and switch from MOCA to wired Ethernet. The MOCA standard specifies up to 175MB, but I don't think MOCA vendors have made any adapters > 100MB. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joel Esler (jesler) Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:17 AM To: Joe Klein Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers I don't believe Quantum has any changes relative to the external of the house. Fios has been capable of pushing those speeds with the "old" modem for years. The difference between the old modem and the new one is that the wireless is 802.11n whereas the old one was only capable of g. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On Apr 13, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Joe Klein <jsklein@gmail.com<mailto:jsklein@gmail.com><mailto:jsklein@gmail.com>> wrote: Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years. Still waiting. Can anyone confirm or deny that Verizon FIOS requires an upgrade to the ONT and router for its "FiOS Quantum" service in order to get IPv6? Joe Klein "Inveniam viam aut faciam" On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org<mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org><mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:42:07PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists@gmail.com<mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com><mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net<mailto:will@willscorner.net><mailto:will@willscorner.net>> wrote: Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6. nice! Sorry to rain on your parade: dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com><http://www.reddit.com>. www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com><http://www.reddit.com> has no AAAA record "should be able to serve" != "are serving". - Matt -- If you are a trauma surgeon and someone dies on your table, [...] everyone would know you "did your best". When someone does something truly stupid with their system and it dies and you can't resuscitate it, you must be incompetent or an idiot. -- Julian Macassey, in the Monastery
My second educated guess is that those initial (BPON) ONTs only supported FastE client interface(s), and that Verizon's new (GPON) ONTs support GigE client interfaces. Frank -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Huff Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:11 AM To: Joel Esler (jesler); Joe Klein Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers The earlier generation of ONT has 100MB Ethernet and MOCA. If you upgrade to Quantum and order speeds > 100MB you'll need an ONT with gig-E and switch from MOCA to wired Ethernet. The MOCA standard specifies up to 175MB, but I don't think MOCA vendors have made any adapters > 100MB. ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joel Esler (jesler) Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:17 AM To: Joe Klein Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers I don't believe Quantum has any changes relative to the external of the house. Fios has been capable of pushing those speeds with the "old" modem for years. The difference between the old modem and the new one is that the wireless is 802.11n whereas the old one was only capable of g. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On Apr 13, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Joe Klein <jsklein@gmail.com<mailto:jsklein@gmail.com>> wrote: Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years. Still waiting. Can anyone confirm or deny that Verizon FIOS requires an upgrade to the ONT and router for its "FiOS Quantum" service in order to get IPv6? Joe Klein "Inveniam viam aut faciam" On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org<mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:42:07PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists@gmail.com<mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Will Dean <will@willscorner.net<mailto:will@willscorner.net>> wrote: Reddit started using CloudFlare late last year, so they should able to serve content up over v6. nice! Sorry to rain on your parade: dhcp-7f000001:~ jared% host -t aaaa www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com>. www.reddit.com<http://www.reddit.com> has no AAAA record "should be able to serve" != "are serving". - Matt -- If you are a trauma surgeon and someone dies on your table, [...] everyone would know you "did your best". When someone does something truly stupid with their system and it dies and you can't resuscitate it, you must be incompetent or an idiot. -- Julian Macassey, in the Monastery
Now if only T-Mobile would launch IPv6 for I-Devices!! No, blaming Apple for not implementing your chosen transition mechanism is not a valid excuse. Owen
On Apr 13, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Good news (that i have not personally verified) !
Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T all launched the Samsung Galaxy S6 with IPv6 on by default.
Given the growth and importance of mobile to Internet, it is great to see this progress from the mobile carriers.
Just for those keeping score, of the top 10 Alexa website for the USA, these major websites prefer IPv6 or prefer NAT44 / NAT64 from the mobile networks
1. Google -- prefers IPv6 2. Facebook -- prefers IPv6 3. Youtube -- prefers IPv6 4. Amazon -- prefers NAT -- :( 5. Yahoo! -- prefers IPv6 6. Wikipedia -- prefers IPv6 7. Twitter -- prefers NAT -- :( 8. Ebay -- prefers NAT -- :( 9. Linkedin -- prefers IPv6 10. Reddit -- prefers NAT -- :(
Dear Amazon, Twitter, Ebay, and Reddit -- please consider this your personal invitation to introduce IPv6 to your service.
participants (17)
-
Bjoern A. Zeeb -
Ca By -
Christopher Morrow -
Finn Herzfeld -
frnkblk＠iname.com -
James Downs -
Jared Mauch -
Jim Popovitch -
Jim Shankland -
Joe Klein -
Joel Esler (jesler) -
Justin M. Streiner -
Matt Palmer -
Matthew Huff -
Owen DeLong -
Stephen Frost -
Will Dean