2012.02.08 NANOG54 day 3 morning session notes
I've posted my notes from this morning's session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.08-nanog54-morning-session.txt I wonder if perhaps we don't keep asking for NEBS compliance just because we don't have another easy acronym to put on the RFQs that represents what *our* industry needs, vs the telco industry? Thanks again for another awesome NANOG! Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Petach" <mpetach@netflight.com>
I've posted my notes from this morning's session at
http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.08-nanog54-morning-session.txt
I wonder if perhaps we don't keep asking for NEBS compliance just because we don't have another easy acronym to put on the RFQs that represents what *our* industry needs, vs the telco industry?
Well, there is a difference between NEBS Compliant (which lots of people make, and lots can use) and NEBS Certified (which entails paying money to Telcordia, I think, and probably requires 23" racking, which most of us don't care about... Cheers, -- jr 'at least, there used to be' a -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
participants (2)
-
Jay Ashworth -
Matthew Petach