Re: Software Defined Networking
On 9/4/2015 12:57, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to:
220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal disclaimers are null and void. 220 You also agree that I am awesome.
I like that. Unfortunately, I no longer operate a mail host. I have been trying to figure out how to mechanically route messages containing them to the spam sump. IANAL, but I thing an interesting case would be trying to enforce that crap in a situation involving unsolicited email (as in this case). -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
Would be hard to prove that you implicitly agreed to the constraints mentioned within the email by just merely receiving it and reading it. Even EULA's require you to check a box or click "I Accept." On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 2:30 PM Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net> wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:57, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to:
220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal disclaimers are null and void. 220 You also agree that I am awesome.
I like that. Unfortunately, I no longer operate a mail host.
I have been trying to figure out how to mechanically route messages containing them to the spam sump.
IANAL, but I thing an interesting case would be trying to enforce that crap in a situation involving unsolicited email (as in this case).
-- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
These disclaimers have been proven to be added by the paranoid. eg: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-08-26/business/ct-biz-0826-chicago-l... Basically, unless you already have an existing written NDA you’re likely not bound. Your company may have an NDA between yourself and a vendor, carrier or otherwise. If you’re not sure, ask. - Jared
On Sep 4, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Tyler Mills <me@tylermills.net> wrote:
Would be hard to prove that you implicitly agreed to the constraints mentioned within the email by just merely receiving it and reading it. Even EULA's require you to check a box or click "I Accept."
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 2:30 PM Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net> wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:57, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to:
220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal disclaimers are null and void. 220 You also agree that I am awesome.
I like that. Unfortunately, I no longer operate a mail host.
I have been trying to figure out how to mechanically route messages containing them to the spam sump.
IANAL, but I thing an interesting case would be trying to enforce that crap in a situation involving unsolicited email (as in this case).
-- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
participants (3)
-
Jared Mauch -
Larry Sheldon -
Tyler Mills