Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else?
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Reese <reese@inkworkswell.com> wrote:
A friend brought this to my attention:
as an aside: <https://www.nic.co/> note the cert in used for the NIC's website... surely the .CO ccTLD could use a real cert? -chris
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Reese <reese@inkworkswell.com> wrote:
A friend brought this to my attention:
as an aside:
note the cert in used for the NIC's website... surely the .CO ccTLD could use a real cert?
also it's not clear that the ipq.co service is really all that robust (if that'd matter to anyone) since ipq.co's nameservers: ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;ipq.co. IN NS ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: ipq.co. 900 IN NS A.NS.ipq.co. ipq.co. 900 IN NS B.NS.ipq.co. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: A.NS.ipq.co. 900 IN A 212.110.169.105 B.NS.ipq.co. 900 IN A 212.110.169.105 are the same host/ip.
participants (1)
-
Christopher Morrow