Re: European ISP enables IPv6 for all?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> wrote: [re: v6 mythos]
In a slightly more realistic vein, a huge address space makes life harder for scanning worms. As Angelos Keromytis, Bill Cheswick, and I have pointed out, "harder" is by no means equivalent to "impossible", but the myth, new as it is, still propagates.
And in fact, "threat propagation" in a v6 world may actually be worse than expected, and naivet� may actually contribute to a larger-scale attack, given the statistical possibility of potentially more victims. Address space size, and proximity, may well be red herrings in this discussion. $.02, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHZ2Gnq1pz9mNUZTMRAmLzAKCqRr4IkAbiXBsUUmH9kdeX1yaSkQCeOduE Dcyed9X7c3XpEC9L2SXvChI= =gHY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
On Dec 17, 2007 9:59 PM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawg@netzero.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
- -- "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
[re: v6 mythos]
In a slightly more realistic vein, a huge address space makes life harder for scanning worms. As Angelos Keromytis, Bill Cheswick, and I have pointed out, "harder" is by no means equivalent to "impossible", but the myth, new as it is, still propagates.
And in fact, "threat propagation" in a v6 world may actually be worse than expected, and naiveté may actually contribute to a larger-scale attack, given the statistical possibility of potentially more victims.
naivete because folks believe the 'v6 is more secure' propoganda? or some other reason?
Address space size, and proximity, may well be red herrings in this discussion.
can you expand on this some?
participants (2)
-
Christopher Morrow
-
Paul Ferguson