The ISOC dashboard that Chris mentions is indeed accurate and up to date from our perspective. Comcast is definitely an active participant with our website http://xfinity.comcast.net, which is live with a published AAAA and is IPv6 reachable. Thanks -- Chris Griffiths Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. On 6/8/11 12:16 PM, "Chris Grundemann" <cgrundemann@gmail.com> wrote:

ISOC has a red/green dashboard of individual (non)participants: http://www.worldipv6day.org/participant-websites/index.html

Cheers, ~Chris

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 09:59, James Harr <james.harr@gmail.com> wrote:

...

I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when they very publicly put on their home page that they would. So I queried the IPv6 day participation list to see who didn't have AAAA's for their listed website. It turned out to be around 9.5%

Before you read the list, here's me shedding responsibility with a list of caveats: - The crappy perl script I am using might be broken. IE - it doesn't think about "foo.com" vs "www.foo.com", HTTP redirection, or any of that. - The organizations in this list may have withdrawn because they found out something was terribly broken. - DNS caching may be skewing the results if the TTLs are long.

==== SNIP ==== www.xiphiastec.com Xiphiastec www.pir.org Public Interest Registry www.exactabacus.com Exact Abacus www.comcast.net Comcast www.shazzlemail.com Shazzle, LLC www.bangzoom.com Bangzoom Software Inc www.mihostcgi.com mihostcgi www.unclesamnames.com American Domain Names opendns.com OpenDNS www.mutali.rw Mutali townnews.com TownNews www.infoblox.com Infoblox www.ripplecom.net Ripple Communications www.agame.com Spil Games www.alexville.com Alexville Games www.hkirc.hk Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation www.hkdnr.hk Hong Kong Domain Name Registration www.buffalo.feb.gov United States Office of Personnel Management www.cyberport.hk Hong Kong Cyberport Management Ltd www.catnix.com CATNIX sucomo.com Sucomo OHG www.mybrighthouse.com BrightHouse Networks www.it-in.ru it-in ivancorp.net Ivanhoe-IT www.forestdaleinc.org Forestdale Inc www.towerstream.com Towerstream www.intuix.com Intuix LLC suse.org Novell Inc. www.IronNails.com IronNails Consultancy www.orbitdiensten.com Orbit-Diensten madonnaradio.com Voila www.gov.bc.ca Government of British Columbia www.zte.com.cn ZTE Corporation www.tamagawa.jp Tamagawa Academy & University

-- ^[:wq^M

-- @ChrisGrundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.theIPv6experts.net www.coisoc.org

On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, George B. wrote:

Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest code). No fix is available for it yet, so we had to shut it down. Ran for about 9 hours before the "magic" client that blew it up connected.

So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get this fixed.

And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day. Thank you for participating. -- TTFN, patrick

...

So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get this fixed.

And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day.

Agreed, right on the money !! Traffic stats may not say a lot yet due to tunnels and lack of native IPv6 connectivity but finding this type of bugs is a major reason to do live tests, even if the test fails. Next one ? a month seems to be too soon, I guess there is a lot of useful data to crunch and analyze and fixes to do, but sure we need more live IPv6 activity. I think it would be cool if for the next one, some major broadband access providers take IPv6 down to the end customer, and not just commercial customers. I know that CPE could be an issue but we need to reach that layer. It does not help that the test says that my machine and browser are ready when in the middle I've a brick that won't work.. Cheers Jorge

I dont think ISOC dashboard is updating any more. Google is no longer advertising AAAA but dashboard still shows green and TTLs were short on those records. \\ ; <<>> DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 <<>> www.google.com in AAAA ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15535 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.google.com. IN AAAA ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.google.com. 588628 IN CNAME www.l.google.com. ;; Query time: 191 msec ;; SERVER: 2620:0:ccc::2#53(2620:0:ccc::2) ;; WHEN: Wed Jun 8 18:08:38 2011 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 52 On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, George B. <georgeb@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com> wrote:

...

...

...

So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get this fixed.

And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day.

Agreed, right on the money !!

Traffic stats may not say a lot yet due to tunnels and lack of native IPv6 connectivity but finding this type of bugs is a major reason to do live tests, even if the test fails.

Well, we are still attempting to recreate the problem. It isn't something as simple as someone coming in over a tunnel with a small MTU with a larger advertised MSS. There is some "magic" that must happen to actually put the unit in this state. We ran for 9 hours before and 9 hours after the hiccup without any problems.

So it is going to take a while before we are ready to test this again live. The sooner I can recreate the problem, the better, though.

Thanks to all the v6day participants on all sides of the net. This has been a great effort that will eventually be a precedent for all a major sites to go dual stack with confidence as bugs are shaken out, access networks are enabled, and meaningful data is collected and processed. Cb PS. Special thanks to isoc and the core group that stuck their neck out to make this happen.

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:45:25 EDT, Ravi Pina said:

We hit some vendor issues which prevented us from having a larger showing, sadly.

Sorry you weren't able to deploy more. But the *important* question is: Did you get enough packet traces/logs/etc of the issue so the vendor is able to take some sort of action?

+1 Jared. Big thanks to all the participants and the ISOC. John ========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable e) mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com o) 609-377-6594 m) 484-962-0060 w) http://www.comcast6.net ========================================= On 6/8/11 9:20 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:

I think it's important to thank Microsoft for leaving sites like xbox IPv6 enabled. Hope many other participants leave it on as well.

I think it's a certain sign of the maturity of the protocol and networks at this stage of the game.

I have observed some traffic step-down in the network, but it's not entirely clear if it's lowered to levels pre-v6-day.

Looking forward to those sharing data at NANOG next week. (I'm not convinced the data I have is worth sharing, but will send it over to the nanogpc soon enough..)

- Jared

On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Shahid Shafi wrote:

...

I dont think ISOC dashboard is updating any more. Google is no longer advertising AAAA but dashboard still shows green and TTLs were short on those records.

I've been saved by the sound of Microsoft. ~Jay "We move the information that moves your world." “Engineering is about finding the sweet spot between what's solvable and what isn't." “Good engineering demands that we understand what we’re doing and why, keep an open mind, and learn from experience.” Radia Perlman  Please consider the environment before printing e-mail -----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:20 PM To: Shahid Shafi Cc: NANOG list Subject: Thank you Microsoft (and others) I think it's important to thank Microsoft for leaving sites like xbox IPv6 enabled. Hope many other participants leave it on as well. I think it's a certain sign of the maturity of the protocol and networks at this stage of the game. I have observed some traffic step-down in the network, but it's not entirely clear if it's lowered to levels pre-v6-day. Looking forward to those sharing data at NANOG next week. (I'm not convinced the data I have is worth sharing, but will send it over to the nanogpc soon enough..) - Jared On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Shahid Shafi wrote:

I dont think ISOC dashboard is updating any more. Google is no longer advertising AAAA but dashboard still shows green and TTLs were short on those records.

Hi Chris Does Azure support IPv6 at this time? Cheers Ryan -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Palmer [mailto:Christopher.Palmer@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 2:20 PM To: Murphy, Jay, DOH; Jared Mauch; Shahid Shafi Cc: NANOG list Subject: RE: Thank you Microsoft (and others) Thank you for the thanks :) We'll be leaving the www.xbox.com web properties online indefinitely. We're holding on other properties but are moving forward at a brisk pace. Best, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:Jay.Murphy@state.nm.us] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 9:49 AM To: Jared Mauch; Shahid Shafi Cc: NANOG list Subject: RE: Thank you Microsoft (and others) I've been saved by the sound of Microsoft. ~Jay "We move the information that moves your world." “Engineering is about finding the sweet spot between what's solvable and what isn't." “Good engineering demands that we understand what we’re doing and why, keep an open mind, and learn from experience.” Radia Perlman P Please consider the environment before printing e-mail -----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:20 PM To: Shahid Shafi Cc: NANOG list Subject: Thank you Microsoft (and others) I think it's important to thank Microsoft for leaving sites like xbox IPv6 enabled. Hope many other participants leave it on as well. I think it's a certain sign of the maturity of the protocol and networks at this stage of the game. I have observed some traffic step-down in the network, but it's not entirely clear if it's lowered to levels pre-v6-day. Looking forward to those sharing data at NANOG next week. (I'm not convinced the data I have is worth sharing, but will send it over to the nanogpc soon enough..) - Jared On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Shahid Shafi wrote:

I dont think ISOC dashboard is updating any more. Google is no longer advertising AAAA but dashboard still shows green and TTLs were short on those records.

Someone has told me that Microsoft "switched off IPv6" for the day. Is that true? To what extent? j -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -

On Jun 9, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:

Someone has told me that Microsoft "switched off IPv6" for the day. Is that true? To what extent?

I think this depends on the division. their search (bing) folks turned it off. % host www.bing.com. www.bing.com is an alias for search.ms.com.edgesuite.net. search.ms.com.edgesuite.net is an alias for a134.b.akamai.net. a134.b.akamai.net has address 96.17.150.114 a134.b.akamai.net has address 96.17.150.112 a134.b.akamai.net has address 96.17.150.105 their gaming folks (xbox) left it on. % host www.xbox.com. www.xbox.com is an alias for www.gtm.xbox.com. www.gtm.xbox.com is an alias for msxbwsd.vo.llnwd.net. msxbwsd.vo.llnwd.net has address 208.111.170.165 msxbwsd.vo.llnwd.net has address 68.142.73.109 msxbwsd.vo.llnwd.net has IPv6 address 2607:f4e8:200:12:225:90ff:fe2a:9f9a msxbwsd.vo.llnwd.net has IPv6 address 2607:f4e8:200:11:230:48ff:fed2:5022 (another view on the world) 2011-06-08.out:www.bing.com.|216.156.249.136,216.156.249.152|2600:1406::5043:4aa7,2600:1406::5043:4a8e|OK|OK|OKOK 2011-06-09.out:www.bing.com.|63.236.253.34,63.236.253.75,63.236.253.82,63.236.253.81,63.236.253.32,63.236.253.41,63.236.253.48,63.236.253.25||OK|Name or service not known| 2011-06-08.out:www.xbox.com.|128.242.186.238,128.242.186.198|2001:418:2401:3::c6ad:1531,2001:418:2401:3::c6ad:1548|OK|OK|OKOK 2011-06-09.out:www.xbox.com.|128.242.186.198,128.242.186.238|2a02:26f0:c:1::5c7a:32ba,2a02:26f0:c:1::5c7a:32b2|OK|OK|OKOK

...

...

...

...

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:21:12 -0700, "George B." <georgeb@gmail.com> said:

GB> There is a reason for that. First of all, we (my employer) took this GB> as a brief test to simply see how much IPv6 traffic there really was, GB> and who and what would actually attempt to reach us by IPv6. The idea GB> here being to attempt to identify IPv6 native networks. Yep. I agree, there are many reasons why you wouldn't want to participate in a full set of tests. I never said otherwise! In fact, many (very much "most") sites didn't participate at all in IPv6 day, so certainly the ones that did get some kudos for playing at all. GB> The test did, however, expose a bug in a piece of vendor gear that was GB> catastrophic to the business service. And that's really the point: get up to speed, test things before hand as best you can, and then test everything you can. The whole point of the day was to expose problems (and successes)! You've exposed one and I'm sure are looking for fixes for it! My only real point is that you still probably don't know what problems exist with the DNS services if you didn't turn IPv6 support for DNS too. I do understand your hesitation, however, as it sounds like you were pretty sure there would be an issue. -- Wes Hardaker My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/ My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/