On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:23 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
randy
I was just looking into this myself. http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/18/reports-libya-follows-egypts-lead-starts-sh... http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110218/tc_afp/libyapoliticsunrestinternetfaceb... But I'm still seeing routes announced by AS21003 (Libya Telecom) and http://www.ltt.ly/ loads for me, so if things are blocked they're taking a different approach than Egypt's "SHUT DOWN EVERYTHING" tactic. In my table right now from LTT, all showing some kind of change about 30 minutes ago: 41.208.64.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100 41.252.0.0/14 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100 41.252.0.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:23:48, MED 100, localpref 100 41.252.64.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:24:46, MED 100, localpref 100 41.252.128.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:23:48, MED 100, localpref 100 41.252.192.0/18 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100 41.254.0.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:25:33, MED 100, localpref 100 41.254.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100 41.254.2.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:24:46, MED 100, localpref 100 41.254.3.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100 62.68.32.0/19 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100 62.240.32.0/19 *[BGP/170] 00:28:54, MED 100, localpref 100 -- Kevin
http://www.monkey.org/~labovit/libya_pulls_plug.png -C Sent from my iPhone On Feb 19, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
randy
thanks, craig luckily, we have no problems like this http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html randy
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
thanks, craig
luckily, we have no problems like this
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
mm what would we do without these well-functioning blacklists ( http://boingboing.net/2010/09/30/only-17-of-sites-blo.html - 1.7% accuracy, few minutes work emailing - few hours resolution time - clearly the blacklists are doing the job well) Regards, Martin
-----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:45 PM To: Craig Labovitz Cc: NANOG Operators' Group Subject: Re: Libya
thanks, craig
luckily, we have no problems like this
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
randy
Double facepalm http://tinypic.com/r/35irr0g/7
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html
And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.... how long before something like this happens with prefix certificates... ooops... we revoked a few thousand certs for a few thousand prefix's because they happened to have the servers serving 84 thousand domains we shut down by accident.... Nice.... real nice... Andrew
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.
there are a thousand means. the problem lies with the intent. randy
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.
there are a thousand means. the problem lies with the intent.
Agreed... doesn't mean its a great idea to create an even easier way to screw up... Andrew
On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:12 36AM, Randy Bush wrote:
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.
there are a thousand means. the problem lies with the intent.
Yes. Remember what happened to Youtube because of (a) a government's intent, and (b) the lack of RPKI.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:12 36AM, Randy Bush wrote:
http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/17/dhs-erroneously-seiz.html And people wonder why I have such deep concerns about RPKI.
there are a thousand means. the problem lies with the intent.
Yes. Remember what happened to Youtube because of (a) a government's intent, and (b) the lack of RPKI.
This is true. But since no one ever seems to be RFC 3514[1] compliant, it's necessary to attempt to intuit intent from behavior. This works equally poorly in nearly all arenas. Cheers, -- jr 'capability creep is a bitch' a [1] pleased to discover that my memory served up the correct number on the first try.
Updated data on Libya and other Internet traffic issues in the region: http://goo.gl/07ONC - Craig
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:41 PM, William Warren <hescominsoon@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2011 1:23 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
randy
renesys shows libya is offline..
And .... they're back, 6h52m later. http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/02/libyan-disconnect-1.shtml --jim
----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> To: "NANOG Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 8:23 PM Subject: Libya
gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
randy
Scuttlebutt has it that because of 'political unrest', Formula 1 was going to move the upcoming race from Bahrain to ...umm hmm.
gossip that libya is off net. any actual data?
randy
Scuttlebutt has it that because of 'political unrest', Formula 1 was going to move the upcoming race from Bahrain to ...umm hmm.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/18/bahrain_internet_disruption/
participants (12)
-
Andrew Alston -
Craig Labovitz -
Fred Baker -
George Bonser -
Jay Ashworth -
Jim Cowie -
Kevin Day -
Martin Millnert -
Michael Painter -
Randy Bush -
Steven Bellovin -
William Warren