
Looks like maybe Sprint and Cogent are experiencing communications difficulties in the DC (and probably other) areas. Theories include a potential depeering. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/sprint-nextel-severs-its-internet-co... Brandon Galbraith wrote:
-- Paul R Fleming Lead Network Administrator Dimenoc Inc Cell - (407)-267-0227 Office - (407)-756-1126 ext 3001

On 10/30/08, Paul Fleming <paul.f@hostdime.com> wrote:
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/sprint-nextel-severs-its-internet-co...
The most interesting part of the press release to me is: In the over 1300 on-net locations worldwide where Cogent provides service, Cogent is offering every Sprint-Nextel wireline customer that is unable to connect to Cogent's customers a free 100 megabit per second connection to the Internet for as long as Sprint continues to keep this partitioning of the Internet in place. Unfortunately, there is no way that Cogent can do the same for the wireless customers of Sprint-Nextel. -brandon

On Oct 30, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
I am seeing issues Cogent -> Sprint at Tyco Road, Tysons Corner VA. arin_whois 206.159.101.241 Sprint SPRINT-W (NET-206-159-0-0-1) 206.159.0.0 - 206.159.255.255 Sprint com FON-34665525765801 (NET-206-159-101-0-1) 206.159.101.0 - 206.159.101.255 ping 206.159.101.241 PING 206.159.101.241 (206.159.101.241) from 63.105.122.7 : 56(84) bytes of data. From 63.105.122.1: Destination Host Unreachable From 63.105.122.1: Destination Host Unreachable show ip bgp 206.159.101.241 % Network not in table It was there as recently as Noon EDT : grep 206.159.101.0 bgp.full* bgp.full.Oct_30_00:07:00_EST_2008:*> 206.159.101.0 38.101.161.116 62050 0 174 1239 6157 i bgp.full.Oct_30_06:07:00_EST_2008:*> 206.159.101.0 38.101.161.116 62050 0 174 1239 6157 i bgp.full.Oct_30_12:07:00_EST_2008:*> 206.159.101.0 38.101.161.116 62050 0 174 1239 6157 i Regards Marshall

On 10/30/08, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
Not that I know of. We tried to get IPv6 transit from Cogent several months ago (we already have IPv4 transit), and were told it's not available yet. -brandon -- Brandon Galbraith Voice: 630.400.6992 Email: brandon.galbraith@gmail.com

Brandon Galbraith wrote:
Not that I know of. We tried to get IPv6 transit from Cogent several months ago (we already have IPv4 transit), and were told it's not available yet.
What a shame. It's extremely miserable, but Sprint has a 6to4 at least. No clue what they have beyond that. It's been a big motivator for us peering native IPv6 so we can push our customers away from that death trap. Yeah, we can tunnel, but most tunnel peers seem low band. Jack
participants (11)
-
Brandon Galbraith
-
Carlos Friacas
-
Deepak Jain
-
Jack Bates
-
Jared Mauch
-
Joe Greco
-
Marshall Eubanks
-
Michal Krsek
-
Patrick W. Gilmore
-
Paul Fleming
-
Randy Epstein