Check this out T-Mobile Launches GoSmart Prepaid Service Nationally on Phone Scoop
Check this out: http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946 This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.
haha i love the header: Received: (from nobody@localhost) On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
Check this out:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946
This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.
An email from nobody? WHAT IS THIS SORCERY?!? --JR On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>wrote:
haha i love the header:
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
Check this out:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946
This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.
Merlin is back; especially for Jay...:-) ./Randy --- On Tue, 2/19/13, Jonathan Rogers <quantumfoam@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Jonathan Rogers <quantumfoam@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Check this out T-Mobile Launches GoSmart Prepaid Service Nationally on Phone Scoop To: "Grant Ridder" <shortdudey123@gmail.com> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 5:58 PM An email from nobody? WHAT IS THIS SORCERY?!?
--JR
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>wrote:
haha i love the header:
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
Check this out:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946
This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.
All in favor of phonescoop being blacklisted from nanog? Anyone? Anyone? Buehler? On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com> wrote:
haha i love the header:
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
Check this out:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946
This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of baylink.com (which could then be leveraged by sc1.nanog.org to turn the recommended soft fail into a hard fail and stop this kind of silliness cold)... Billet:~ rs$ dig +short baylink.com. txt Billet:~ rs$ dig +short baylink.com. spf Billet:~ rs$ -r George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com> writes:
All in favor of phonescoop being blacklisted from nanog? Anyone? Anyone? Buehler?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com> wrote:
haha i love the header:
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
Check this out:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946
This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought you might be interested in the page linked above.
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:59:53AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of [snip]
SPF is snake-oil. Here's something that works (salt to taste for the MTA of your choice): Connect:phonescoop.com ERROR:5.7.1:"550 Mail refused, known forgery source" From:phonescoop.com ERROR:5.7.1:"550 Mail refused, known forgery source" ---rsk
On 20 Feb 2013, at 5:22 PM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:59:53AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of [snip]
SPF is snake-oil. Here's something that works (salt to taste for the MTA of your choice):
Connect:phonescoop.com ERROR:5.7.1:"550 Mail refused, known forgery source" From:phonescoop.com ERROR:5.7.1:"550 Mail refused, known forgery source"
Because putting things into a file on your server, instead of some distributed mechanism we could refer to, makes that much more sense. Did you guys see this /etc/hosts thing? It's awesome! I DON'T EVEN HAVE TO RUN A DNS SERVER!! *flamesuit* -J
----- Original Message -----
From: "JP Viljoen" <froztbyte@froztbyte.net>
[ Rich K wrote: ]
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:59:53AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of [snip]
SPF is snake-oil. Here's something that works (salt to taste for the MTA of your choice):
Connect:phonescoop.com ERROR:5.7.1:"550 Mail refused, known forgery source" From:phonescoop.com ERROR:5.7.1:"550 Mail refused, known forgery source"
Because putting things into a file on your server, instead of some distributed mechanism we could refer to, makes that much more sense. Did you guys see this /etc/hosts thing? It's awesome! I DON'T EVEN HAVE TO RUN A DNS SERVER!!
*flamesuit*
And you'll need the Nomex undies, cause what Rich was *recommending* had nothing to do with that. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
participants (8)
-
George Herbert -
Grant Ridder -
Jay Ashworth -
Jonathan Rogers -
JP Viljoen -
Randy -
Rich Kulawiec -
Robert E. Seastrom