Re: IP addresses are now assets
Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6? David
From: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>
Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?
BEFORE that is introduced, one needs a mailing-list designated for discussion of the potential problems an dangers associated therewith, similar to the ACM's discussion list on computer technoogy. May I propose that it be called the "Humor-esque Digest". An approprite 'publisher' would be the I.S.P.F.[1], with the editor required to use Alfred E. Neuman as his professional psuedonym. "if you're going to do a thing, do it RIGHT!!" "Anything worth doing, is worth over-doing." Footnotes: [1] International 'Save the Pun' Foundation -- yes, they -really- exist.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Bonomi" <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
"if you're going to do a thing, do it RIGHT!!"
"Anything worth doing, is worth over-doing."
I love a good self-referential posting; don't you? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:18, David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com> wrote:
Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?
I am not that familiar with Humorv6. Has Hv6 had sufficient operational input, or is it based on a philosophically pure redesign of humor making it theoretically funny, but in practice most of the humor falls flat. Does it require a redesign of the existing infrastructure (i.e. comedy clubs) in order to get the joke? And, of course, is the British implementation of HumourV6 compatible the American implementation of HumorV6? Gary
The British have been using the correct six character word length for humour ad memoriam. Christian de Larrinaga On 4 Dec 2011, at 15:15, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:18, David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com> wrote:
Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?
I am not that familiar with Humorv6. Has Hv6 had sufficient operational input, or is it based on a philosophically pure redesign of humor making it theoretically funny, but in practice most of the humor falls flat. Does it require a redesign of the existing infrastructure (i.e. comedy clubs) in order to get the joke? And, of course, is the British implementation of HumourV6 compatible the American implementation of HumorV6?
Gary
Extra and unnecessary characters do not a correct word make. Owen On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:27 AM, cdel.firsthand.net wrote:
The British have been using the correct six character word length for humour ad memoriam.
Christian de Larrinaga
On 4 Dec 2011, at 15:15, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:18, David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com> wrote:
Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?
I am not that familiar with Humorv6. Has Hv6 had sufficient operational input, or is it based on a philosophically pure redesign of humor making it theoretically funny, but in practice most of the humor falls flat. Does it require a redesign of the existing infrastructure (i.e. comedy clubs) in order to get the joke? And, of course, is the British implementation of HumourV6 compatible the American implementation of HumorV6?
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com> On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:27 AM, cdel.firsthand.net wrote:
The British have been using the correct six character word length for humour ad memoriam.
Extra and unnecessary characters do not a correct word make.
The u is silent. Like the 3 in Hen3ry. Cheers, -- jr 'Stein with an "e-i" and Styne with a "y".' a -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
participants (6)
-
cdel.firsthand.net -
David Barak -
Gary Buhrmaster -
Jay Ashworth -
Owen DeLong -
Robert Bonomi