Sorry, no. The question was about guiding principles for an updated ICP between the RIRs. That's what I responded to: improvements to that document not "concerns" about individual RIRs.
You also requested a tangent about detail-level changes I might make to the RIRs themselves, so I offered some ideas born from my direct experience. Sorry that confused you.
Repeating my original question: What is, in your opinion, the perfect scenario by which the functions of
the RIRs today could be structured? The 'if I could greenfield this today' idea?
I was not asking about updates to ICP-2. I was specifically asking for your greenfield idea, in an attempt to work backwards and understand your concerns and perspective. It's clear you aren't interested in actual debate and discussion , but would prefer to just stomp and yell. I'll stop polluting everyone else's inboxes trying to sort through that. Take care. On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:01 AM William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:26 PM Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
It sounds to me then that you don't really have much of an issue with the RIR system generally then, but your concerns are more centered on one specific RIR.
Sorry, no. The question was about guiding principles for an updated ICP between the RIRs. That's what I responded to: improvements to that document not "concerns" about individual RIRs.
You also requested a tangent about detail-level changes I might make to the RIRs themselves, so I offered some ideas born from my direct experience. Sorry that confused you.
Regards, Bill Herrin
-- William Herrin bill@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/