Sorry, no. The question was about guiding principles for an updated
ICP between the RIRs. That's what I responded to: improvements to that
document not "concerns" about individual RIRs.
You also requested a tangent about detail-level changes I might make
to the RIRs themselves, so I offered some ideas born from my direct
experience. Sorry that confused you.
Repeating my original question:
What is, in your opinion, the perfect scenario by which the functions of the RIRs today could be structured? The 'if I could greenfield this today' idea?
I was not asking about updates to ICP-2. I was specifically asking for your greenfield idea, in an attempt to work backwards and understand your concerns and perspective.
It's clear you aren't interested in actual debate and discussion , but would prefer to just stomp and yell. I'll stop polluting everyone else's inboxes trying to sort through that.
Take care.