18 May
2011
18 May
'11
8:41 p.m.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Heath Jones <hj1980@gmail.com> wrote:
My point here is it IS possible to transfer just a hash and counter value and effectively generate identical data at the remote end. The limit that will be hit is the difficulty of generating and comparing hash values with current processing power.
I'm proposing iterating through generated data up until the actual data. It's not even a storage issue, as once you have incremented the data you don't need to store old data or hash values - just the counter. No massive hash tables.
It's a CPU issue.
i'd note it took you many more packets than my example of roughly the same thing. if you really want to save bandwidth, my 1 packet answer is the best answer.