On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 09:59:35AM -0500, Jorge Amodio wrote:
Regarding Bubba, he won't likely move until there is a real problem, this makes it on CNN, and even then, he may not understand what is going on. That win2k server in the corner never got updated. But when he realizes his business is at risk due to the buggy software, our pal Bubba will eventually upgrade.
[sarcasm] It won't take too long until the three lettered news outfits declare the demise of the internet, Angelina already had the twins, Obama convinced the Germans to vote for him, McCain didn't win bingo night, and Dolly didn't sunk the state of Texas under water, so there are no really exciting news to report, sooner or later they will fish what is being discussed and make up something to fill the void.
I'd leave the "Bubba in chief" and his associates out of the loop, if they see the word "poisoned" they will decimate the entire DNS infrastructure and later send Paul Vixie to explain to Congress why is a good idea to go back to the HOSTS.TXT, charge 5 bucks for each download (price dependant on the actual barrel of oil) and return to punch cards (made by Halliburton) ... [/sarcasm]
So, you say that(sarcasm). I just got off a 45 minute call where the US Federal government is interested in how to effectively communicate to the infrastructure operators the importance and risks of not upgrading the resolvers. They wanted someone to apporach those NANOG guys to see if they'll get off their butts and upgrade. Personally, I share some of their frustration in getting the reasonable people to upgrade their software, knowing that the unreasonable folks won't. The question is how can we as an interdependent industry close the gaps of the "Bubba" SPs and their software upgrade policies? That being said, is there anyone keeping metrics of what upgrades have been done so far? - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.