24 Sep
2016
24 Sep
'16
2:53 p.m.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net> wrote:
* morrowc.lists@gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) [Sat 24 Sep 2016, 18:55 CEST]:
boy, it'd sure be nice if there were some 'science' and 'measurement' behind such statements. Didn't k-root do some anycast studies ~8-10 years back?
Not k-root but CacheFly 2006: https://www.nanog.org/meetings /nanog37/presentations/matt.levine.pdf
that's not the one I was thinking of, this is: <https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog39/presentations/larson.pdf> which references your presentation, nice! and is about J-root, not K-root, but mentions Lorenzo's work on K-root studies... In anycase, both seem to say that 'tcp anycast works fine' (inside some set of parameters). thanks! -chris