On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:58:03AM -0400, alex@yuriev.com wrote:
alex@yuriev.com wrote:
According to definition, is should take the same path, but are there any other cases that I should be aware of?
According to the definition, it is going to show you the path the packets took from you to the destination, not from the destination back.
Unless you did "- g",
Not correct. -g specifies loose source routing on the way *there*, not back.
Alex, I think the intention was to indicate that you can traceroute -g <remote-router-before-host> <your-local-ip> to get the path to and back. -g requires an argument obviously.. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.