----- Original Message -----
From: "Gaurab Raj Upadhaya" <gaurab@lahai.com>
So you're *REALLY* motivated on this "reduce the coverage" thing, then.
you could say yes :), reduce the coverage per-AP. Most APs I have seen will start failing with about ~100 associations and not to forget about the max GE uplink they have. that's about 40-50 people at most (being optimist).
Really? 100 associations? On enterprise/carrier grade gear? Seriously?
g) we have a /32 and /20 (v6 and v4 respectively) address space assigned by APNIC for this and other events in Asia (including the APNIC meeting itself) so we use that. We used to have a v4 /16 though before runout.
I'm talking to someone from the Interop team; they have a dedicated /8.
They gave that 45/8 back and kept 2 x /16 for themselves.
I did not know that. Good on 'em. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274