Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:54 PM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:

Okay, granted you can probably cover your corner case here with a priority 20 MX that leads to a unicast address on one of the two servers. SMTP can let the rare fellow with the bisected packet flow gracefully fall back.

but 'well behaved smtp clients' should already be falling back right?