----- Original Message -----
From: "John Peach" <john-nanog@johnpeach.com>
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:57:38 -0400 (EDT) Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
SMTP Auth to *arbitrary remote domains' MX servers*? Am I missing something, or are you?
I run an MTA on my server and auth to that from laptops and other clients. Relaying allowed for authorised users.
So, in other words, it's ok to rant and stomp our feet about the end-to-end architecture and how critical it is to support in order to diss NAT, but we're required to ignore it when discussing SMTP? I'm not sure I'm following, there. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274